search results matching tag: gir

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (28)     Sift Talk (3)     Blogs (1)     Comments (126)   

Zim's lies

Man In The Women's Locker Room Is Now The Norm

JiggaJonson says...

And what am I supposed to do with the kid who insisted I call them (fake name) Aaron instead of Ashley, what to tell him when the wrestling team won't let him on because he doesn't have a penis ?

Should I go tell him to just try being more girly? Eh? Kid fixes cars for a living and has a teenage beard and chases girls. Like, where are the Republicans that are "keep big government away from us"

You know? Maybe find some of those 'to each their own' Republicans to get these ones to shut up

Emotional Wedding Haka

BSR says...

After all, when you are the baddest mutherfucker on the planet, restraint is your finest attribute.

I always thought of weddings as feminine reverie. I suppose the masculines need to make it about themselves so as to not look soft.

Just because I'm doing this girly thing doesn't mean I can't kick your ass. Now, play that Beer Barrel Polka!

fuzzywuzzywasabear said:

That was pathetic. Women: not Haka. White people: not Haka. (Not that there are any full-blood Maori's left, but for fuck's sake at least look like one.) Haka now seems to be some kind of novelty dance that anyone can do whenever they please. It is supposed to be terrifying; you are filling your enemies with the fear that that are about to be slaughtered and eaten. Why the fuck would anyone do it at a wedding?

F1 driver overcome w emotion as son follows in his footsteps

Crotch Firework Goes All Kinds of Wrong

Expensive Wine Is For Suckers

Sumo wrestling made sexier

ant says...

*dead -- "'sexy japanese gir...' This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by TV- Asahi Corp.. "

Reducing the Male Population by 90% Will Solve Everything

newtboy says...

How exactly are they intending to have only female children (and to force everyone else to follow along)? Is this an infanticide movement?
And why the sexism girly? Can't we just reduce the number of children by 90%, male and female? Wouldn't that also solve most of the problems you complain about? It would certainly solve many of mine.

White phosphorus mortar shell misfires

G-bar says...

Had a similar experience. We were firing a 160mm mortar and one shell made a weird thump noise when fired... We saw it land at about 10 meters away. I remember someone making a similar girly scream like the one on the vid :-)

Fantastic Toy Commercial For Future Girl Engineers

shatterdrose says...

Holy cow the sift has turned into the most "deconstruct this video to prove the point it's making is self-defeating" site I've seen since YouTube.

On a personal note: I banned all princess movies. If my 2 girls want to watch a movie, I have to first approve of it, and watch it with them the first time. And I make it a constant point to let them know they don't have to be some sissy princess girly girl. I take them out, let them play with sticks and mud, and we do crafts at home, make food together, make ice cream, play with fire, and watch MythBusters and occasionally forget the "do no try at home part".

But, I also let them paint their nails and wear pretty clothes. But "princesses" they will not be.

Honest Trailers - Star Trek Into Darkness (feat. HISHE)

chingalera says...

Couple of things that stood out most:
Michael Shannon (general Zod) apparently took voice-coaching lessons from Jeff Bridges
Superman was considerably less gay this time, and Lois Lane was soft and smooth and girly (plus Amy Adams has the natural reddish-brown hair of the comic book Lois Lane)

Otherwise the damn thing was preposterous....OH, and the CGI of the attack on the city?? Wholly unbelievable (i.e. the segment when Metropolis is under attack and all the central characters at ground zero miraculously survive).

EvilDeathBee said:

I thought it was great, but according to critics I'm wrong and should be locked up

A duck cries for ducklings and cops help them out

chingalera says...

I gave up when I came back to the VS and found that a handful of girly-girls were in the process of hijacking the front page with kitties and sloths taking 2-hour movements on poles-

enoch said:

damn you and your cute videos!
i was trying to maintain a even-handed grumpy level today.

goddammit.....

Female Supremacy

Kofi says...

In feminist theory there are many branches. There are two main branches that have sub-branches.

Liberal feminism - the idea that we are all equal through our capacity for rationality. Equality will come about through the practice and recognition of this equal capacity for rationality and as institutions change so too will women's capacity to demonstrate this. The reason that this currently can't be exhibited is because of a patriarchal system that views women as weak and soft minded. This leads lib fems to try to be "man-like" of mind so as to assert their equal status; girly but strong minded, ie. Thatcher(extreme example), Clinton, Rachel Maddow.

Radical feminism - Men are the oppressive class and women are the oppressed. (Try to deny it seriously. If not within the West then within the rest of the world) As a result women must form a opposition to this oppression by mens of taking sides. Women can still be equal of any attribute such as reason etc but none the less by virtue of their biological sex they are relegated to 2nd place based on that alone. The response is to form an equally if not more powerful class to overthrow the patriarchal system. Now this is where the original video things its anti men. It is anti patriarchy, anti a system millennia old that places political capital on birth right/biology. To argue against this risks committing a naturalistic fallacy whereby what IS is what is RIGHT. Through time we can cite all sorts of examples where that is not the case - slavery, pederasty, segregation. One way of addressing this patriarchy oppression is by banding together and attacking overt examples of gender/sex discrinination and oppression as is put forward in the video as reverse oppression (whatever). The other more radical feminism asks that women forgo their own proclivities and become political lesbians. This requires that they become a lesbian not only in solidarity with their sexed brethren but also actively reject men as a necessary part of a flourishing life.

So much of the discourse, on both sides, confuses the aims of which ever brand of feminism they prescribe (sometimes a mix of both) with instances of activism/oppression. Anecdotal evidence can only do so much in a systematic and ingrained norm such as gender roles.

The original video is laughably inane and self-agrandising in its selective use of anecdotes and conflation of one idea with another. It is as worse than radical-radical feminist arguments insofar as it cherry picks examples to highlight that which is unsystematic whereas rad fems point out things that are systematic but their ends are not understandable, or acceptable if understood, by most. That doesn't mean they are wrong.

TLDR; Lib fem, go with the flow and ask for gradual change. Rad fem, form a opposition of power and overthrow current system then restructure from what is divorced from historically contingient oppressive gender description.

Football (soccer) in a nutshell

It's always better to give than receive.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon