You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Dr. Phil: Alcoholic. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

Remember...

<embed src="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/10/dream_jobs/image/dr_phil_mcgraw.jpg">

Dr. Phil is only here to help you!

The way I see it, we're all so used to seeing a guy who told us the economy really didn't make our ass look fat, and the torture was really because he loved us, that now when we have this new guy who shows up at the door with a single rose telling us he loves us for how beautiful we really are on the -inside- and that he'll always try and stay true, that we're having trouble letting go of all that self loathing and guilt... and now if you'll excuse me I have a tub of Dreyer's cookie dough and several episodes of Dr. Phil on Tivo to watch! *CRIES*

>> ^Sagemind:
Ha Ha..., He sounds like Bill Cosby!!


Upvote this freaking comment!

pretty obvious, he slowed Dr. Phil down and it makes him sound drunk. Still funny

Question, WHERE THE FUCK IS THE DAD?! I smell the next John Wayne Gacy Jr.

Here is a link to a longer clip of that Dr.phil show.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vQASUdUoHA

I'm not anti-porn; I'm anti-porn in relationships. I agree with gorgonheap 100%. Porn is destructive to healthy relationships. I realize most of the guys on this site are porn connoisseurs and don't want to hear it. However, if you look at the research, you might be in for a surprise. From a 2004 Time article:

"[Psychologist] Mark Schwartz, director of the Masters and Johnson clinic in St. Louis, Mo., says porn not only causes men to objectify women—seeing them as an assemblage of breasts, legs and buttocks—but also leads to a dependency on visual imagery for arousal."

And I realize you [generalization] don't care for the site that thepinky references, but please just take a look at the quotes on this site. The last three are quotes from a book and from a researcher. I understand they're not what you want to hear, and you might think they're extreme cases - the second quote from a wife of a porn user certainly is. I have heard complaints similar to the ones Ana Bridges identifies. Women don't want to think their significant other is thinking about anyone but them when they're doing the deed. Use of pornography gets a lot of women second-guessing.

Dr. Phil has a message board dedicated to women whose lives and marriages have been torn apart because of porn. One woman: "...laying in bed hurt because he would rather be on the computer. Before porn I never found myself alone at bedtime." This is an excerpt from a great message from a women... I wish I could link to the individual messages.

"These days, if you're anti-porn, you're called "insecure" and "behind the times". I assure you it is because I HAVE self esteem that I'm anti-porn. These men are deluding themselves about what they're actually witnessing. It's all an ACT. It's PRETEND. And maybe that's just what they want...pretend sex. I have been through the whole porn thing with my ex...whom I was married to for over 20 years. I understand the pain of being lied to...and substitued. Porn IS a substitute...and if they don't think so, they're in denial about the whole thing. What better way for a man (or woman) to come home from a long hard day, and that night have a wonderfully emotional loving experience with the woman he professes to love?

...[hypothetical situation to another poster on the board] If he were the jealous sort, and his wife loved innocent, harmless flirting...yet it caused him considerable pain, isn't that along the same lines? HE would be asking her to stop doing something that *she* loved to do. Because it caused him PAIN. I just don't think these men understand the true amount of pain that this causes to the women. It has NOTHING to do with esteem issues."

She goes on, and I think it's a great post, but way too long to quote the entire thing.

For those of you disagreeing with the concept that porn is inherently wrong or bad, I agree to a point. Porn itself doesn't cause problems - porn in a relationship likely will.

And what? Replace him with Falafel O'Reilly?

And you must have seen bigger douchebags somewhere in your life. Maybe at a Sam's Club, when you ran into Dr. Phil?

>> ^Doc_M:
This man is the biggest douchebag I've ever encountered.
There's a reason his ratings are crap. If I were NBC, I'd fire his ass.

>> ^HadouKen24:
Where did we go wrong? By going mainly for visual sexual stimuli in our magazines. By going for primarily verbal stimuli, women's mags have the advantage of being relatively safe around young children--either they can't read, or they don't have the context (frequently) to understand what's going on.
You have to take the time to read for the stimuli aimed at women, whereas one only need a pair of eyes and a brain reasonably functional at interpreting visual images to ingest the stimuli aimed at men.

Mmm, this is some good pop psychology crap. To prepubescent children, a half-naked woman/man doesn't mean more than a harlequin novel. Yes they understand the words, yes they see the nakedness, but they don't assign sexual meaning to these stimuli by themselves, at least not anything they are conscious of or can act on. They have to be told what to think of it, and every Dr. Phil and Reverent Nutjob is eager to have his say. And the worst you can do isn't showing them some naked pictures or an article talking about sex, but to tell them it's wrong or unnatural to see/read it and have feelings about it, feelings that they don't even have yet: you're training them to think as wrong something they will unconsciously seek and have an urge for later, namely "sex" (in all its forms). You can't help it, they won't be able to help it, and trying to shield them from it is idiotic at best and criminally negligent at worst. What is even worst is preaching prudishness and then buying the worst magazines: not Playboy where girls are paid to be naked, but magazines where girls are half-naked to sell you something. The first is simple prostitution (consumption), whereas the second is akin to pimping (exploitation). You're telling them exploiting women/men is O.K. if you're hypocrital about it.

Looks like the Dawkster is feeling a bit under the weather. I wish I could get him to talk to my own parents, especially the bit about comforting thoughts; Oprah™(plus her superfluous book club) and Dr.Phil's words have more sway with them than my own.

It's Mann Coulter, but the mustache doesn't really do much for him/her.
I'm sorry, but I have to downvote this and I'll tell you why. 1st, Dr. Phil is a douche (that's a given), and secondly, WTF is he doing with this clownpenis on his show... and THIRD, It looks like the super douche-guest himself has put this clip up to promote his dumbfuck site. This guy thrives off of the publicity, negative or not. Let's not contribute to that.

>> ^kronosposeidon:
You shamed me into fixing a couple of videos this very evening. Have you no shame?


No, I lost my shame years ago. Around the same time I started watching Dr. Phil.

Please take Dr. Phil back. We don't want him!

see, because someone is skilled at copying someone does not make them funny. good comedy (and most art in general) revolves around ..i dont know .. being creative, original and clever ? seriously mr.zombie .. how long is this bit going to last ? dr.phil impressions? seriously, this is not comedy . just an impersonator with flat one-note jokes . its elementary and just plain silly.. i ts on par with people like carrot top. . its a gimmick and not a thought out comic routine.

Dead

http://www.videosift.com/video/Ever-wonder-what-Dr-Phil-would-say-to-a-Scientologist