> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/spoco2" title="member since August 21st, 2006" class="profilelink">spoco2 Stop in the name of american squeamishness. This skates the edges, certainly, I expected that the explicit blowjob part would be its doom, but I think this is siftable. If there wasn't an executive order not to sift porn and if people weren't so overly diligent in interpreting that, it would have sifted fine too.


Don't even try to make this be about people being 'prudes'. There are places for that sort of thing, and the sift is NOT one of them, it's not us being prudish about the content, it's about us not wanting it on THIS SITE. One of the things about this place is that it's pretty much work safe, even the NSFW stuff is fine for most workplaces. THAT was nowhere NEAR being safe for any work place, and it is, whether you like it or not, hard core porn. As soon as there is a dick in a mouth or other orifice it is porn.

We all know you like your porn gwiz, and that's fine, hell, I have no issue with it myself, but get your porn fix elsewhere and keep it away from here. Why must you keep trying to bring it here? *sigh* Are you on some crusade to make the sift a pornocopia? Just leave it be.

@spoco2 Stop in the name of american squeamishness. This skates the edges, certainly, I expected that the explicit blowjob part would be its doom, but I think this is siftable. If there wasn't an executive order not to sift porn and if people weren't so overly diligent in interpreting that, it would have sifted fine too.

Actually:
GOD = 7 + 15 + 4 = 26
BLOWJOB = 2+12+15+23+10+15+2 = 79

Which means that a blowjob beats three gods!
Quod Erat Demonstrandum, motherfuckers.

He's sayin' what we're all thinkin'!

>> ^shagen454:

It sort of doesn't seem like the first real android. Though, it might be the first robot that can give a semi-decent blowjob if you put enough lube in it's mouth without short-circuiting; I know that is a sort of horrific thing to say but am just pointing out the obvious thing going through my head watching it's mouth open and close.

It sort of doesn't seem like the first real android. Though, it might be the first robot that can give a semi-decent blowjob if you put enough lube in it's mouth without short-circuiting; I know that is a sort of horrific thing to say but am just pointing out the obvious thing going through my head watching it's mouth open and close.

still not seeing it.. or if i am, thats one boring blowjob.

*doublepromote a blowjob 150 seconds in

What happened to the elevator pictures?

"REPORTER: Can you talk about the montage of pictures at the end of this film? The blowjob. Apparently the MPAA didn’t watch the closing credits.

COOPER: Is that against the rules? Really? It’s a dildo though.

GALIFIANAKIS: But that woman was seventy seven years old. I think there’s an age where it becomes non-sexual.

REPORTER: Was that a prosthetic?

GALIFIANAKIS: I don’t remember. I have to look at again to see what the size was. We were just talking about it. It didn’t match my skin color. It looks like a piece of taffy. I would never."

Source: Link

lol, "I don't remember" - yeah right.

>> ^sme4r:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.04/hacker_pr.html check him out


Thanks for the info. Still, I wouldn't take anything at Wired too seriously. Every third article is a blowjob piece about the newest and greatest US killing machine.

Notice how they mention almost like a minor detail the fact that Lamo stalked and used a tazer on his ex-girlfriend. But hey! He loves kittens.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Kevlar.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Statue-of-blowjob-on-a-church

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by jimnms. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

*isdupe=http://videosift.com/video/Statue-of-blowjob-on-a-church

It's not weird. You're just a douchebag.

>> ^bleedmegood:

There are several different variables that factor in to whether or not I will go down on a woman....after all is said and done there are only about 30% of women I deem cunnilingus-worthy.....remarkably tho, I like to receive oral from 100% women.....weird huh? I't's a mystery of science and mathematics I suppose.....
>> ^bananafone:
Same could be said about guys who go down on women. Seriously.
And don't get me started on the guys who refuse just after I go down on them. It's a two way street, boys.

Yeah, took me a while to figure out it was a parody. She slowly worked it in. I think it was when she started talking about the blowjob... oh, wait, that was fifteen seconds in. Obviously, some people in this thread never realized it was a parody.