>> ^Mookal:
^
I'm sorry, I wasn't listening.
...


I said, perhaps you should pay attention to the humor of these people. These are professional comedians at their best!

Man, it's really hard playing the straight guy. I have no idea how Colin can do this and keep a straight face!

>> ^sawtooth:
Is this good?


I'm worried that if you don't find this funny, then your ha-ha bones might be broken. Seek a doctor immediately!

>> ^MilkmanDan:
More please! (Two Line Vocabulary in particular, but more Whose Line in general is always good)



Here ya go, MilkmanDan!

http://www.videosift.com/video/Whose-Line-is-it-Anyway-2-Line-Vocab-Dangerous-Mission

>> ^MilkmanDan:
More please! (Two Line Vocabulary in particular, but more Whose Line in general is always good)



This right here is one of the funniest things on the internets...
http://www.videosift.com/video/Whose-Line-Is-It-Anyway-Clip-Featuring-Richard-Simmons

More please! (Two Line Vocabulary in particular, but more Whose Line in general is always good)

Your video, Whose Line is it Anyway: 2 Line Vocabulary (Who Needs This?), has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I miss this show. This and Whose Line is all I watched before I canceled cable. No use spending $75/month just to watch two shows.

>> ^HaricotVert:
I was really hoping for Drew Carey to walk down and say "Hi, I'm Drew Carey."
Drew Carey-deprecating humor always gets laughs.

It woulda been better if Ryan walked down and said "Hi, I'm Drew Carey"

Your video, Whose Line Is It Anyway - Worst Person To Be Married To, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Whose Line is one of the shows that often has me busting out laughing.

Thanks for all the sifts, especially the Whose Line ones!

I just wanted to drop a note thanking you for rational discussion. It was pleasant. We don't agree on everything and that's just fine. Glad to have you here.

I have a tendency to leave snarky and smartass responses. I use my navy time as the scapegoat. I'd like to apologize for my past responses and will keep my responses to you civil from now on.

Have a good day!

In reply to this comment by Winstonfield_Pennypacker:
You obviously feel a connection to the discourse on videosift... in a way that makes me think you are an alt of someone on here, or perhaps even the new BillO.

I am no one's alt. I enjoy watching videos. I like funny ones, old "Whose Line" clips, and other stuff. However, to my dismay, Videosift (and others) have been co-opted by far-left neolibs who use sites as an increasingly private sounding board for negativity towards anything they don't like.

Case in point. A solid 30% of the vids here today are liberally slanted garbage. Between Bill Maher, Olberman, Madcow, atheism/creationism threads, and so forth there are at least 5+ 'neolib' threads on the top 15 at any given time. A strange trait for a 'fair, tolerant, and balanced' population, eh?

These neolib threads are typically far-left screeds. They are vapid in content. They eggregiously violate logic. They are blatantly baised. Intellectually, they aren't fit for the dung heap, let alone the 'top 15' list. And yet there they are. Every day. And the comments are universally filled to the brim of what can only be described as neolib cheerleaders bleating about how great they are, and trampling any different perspective.

I lean conservative on many issue, but liberal on others. Above all I detest the practice of presenting only one very biased side of an argument and then acting as if it one has made a valid point. It is an odious tendency, that results only in stroking the egos of its participants.

Therefore I feel (occasionally) that there is intellectual value to injecting a reasoned, logical, non-profane perspective into a topic that would otherwise be the metaphysical equivalent of a neolib circle-jerk.

I simply find that I am - sadly - the only person on the sift who is able to provide this much-needed counterbalance in a way that is not inflammatory at its face value. QM is too profane and 'angry'. I prefer the cool balm of reason, logic, and common sense.

You obviously feel a connection to the discourse on videosift... in a way that makes me think you are an alt of someone on here, or perhaps even the new BillO.

I am no one's alt. I enjoy watching videos. I like funny ones, old "Whose Line" clips, and other stuff. However, to my dismay, Videosift (and others) have been co-opted by far-left neolibs who use sites as an increasingly private sounding board for negativity towards anything they don't like.

Case in point. A solid 30% of the vids here today are liberally slanted garbage. Between Bill Maher, Olberman, Madcow, atheism/creationism threads, and so forth there are at least 5+ 'neolib' threads on the top 15 at any given time. A strange trait for a 'fair, tolerant, and balanced' population, eh?

These neolib threads are typically far-left screeds. They are vapid in content. They eggregiously violate logic. They are blatantly baised. Intellectually, they aren't fit for the dung heap, let alone the 'top 15' list. And yet there they are. Every day. And the comments are universally filled to the brim of what can only be described as neolib cheerleaders bleating about how great they are, and trampling any different perspective.

I lean conservative on many issue, but liberal on others. Above all I detest the practice of presenting only one very biased side of an argument and then acting as if it one has made a valid point. It is an odious tendency, that results only in stroking the egos of its participants.

Therefore I feel (occasionally) that there is intellectual value to injecting a reasoned, logical, non-profane perspective into a topic that would otherwise be the metaphysical equivalent of a neolib circle-jerk.

I simply find that I am - sadly - the only person on the sift who is able to provide this much-needed counterbalance in a way that is not inflammatory at its face value. QM is too profane and 'angry'. I prefer the cool balm of reason, logic, and common sense.

Thanks a lot, Arvana

In reply to this comment by arvana:
*promote the Whose Line!

*promote the Whose Line!