You outright liar. (Nothing new)

Since you claimed you HEAR a beat BEFORE it can be SEEN, which is 100% backwards and something someone in the field should definitely know, you've been silent on that thread, hiding from your mistakes as usual.

Yes, facts are correct, you just didn't offer any. You gave your opinion based on ....who knows what, not medical science. Not reality.

You did not prove a thing, you rambled, listed your alleged career, claimed knowing doctors doesn't make you one, then said you know what your talking about because you know lots of doctors, etc. You gave no citations or backup for your claims, that there's a heart at 6 weeks, claims which I contradicted with multiple citations from medical sites, including instructions for the Doppler that contradicts you too.

You were proven wrong, and as usual you just hid from the thread. Try again.

And Kevin Bacon was in Footloose…

Ahhhhhahahahaha.....you delusional fool.
That's not an answer, it's the same fact free nonsense stupidity you started with.

Every claim, every word is true.
Do you deny Ivanka got a gift of patents worth millions? She did. They bragged about it.
Do you deny Trump owes China money? He does, prove he doesn't.
Do you deny his trade wars cost America tens to hundreds of Billions in losses and tariffs? They did.
Do you deny his trade talks failed? They did.
Do you deny Kevin Bacon was in Footloose? He was.
https://videosift.com/video/That-s-one-stubborn-mule

I can't find a word in it that's untrue, but I expect nothing less from you. You can't factually declare any statements untrue statements with evidence or facts so, like a two year old, you just claim it's all untrue and think you won an argument, but you have lost both the argument and your adulthood.

You still haven't said what's untrue, and claiming it's all untrue is just so stupidly infantile I feel bad for you, but it's the best you've got without direction on how to answer, isn't it?

So sad, Bob. You've got nothing but insist you're the one with everything. You don't bluff well, Bob. Grow up.

I expect you deny Trump's stated lust for Ivanka as a YOUNG girl, I expect you deny his multiple fraud convictions, I suppose you deny his lifetime ban from charities due to charity frauds, or his children. I suppose you deny his having more felons in his cabinet than any two previous administrations, and more convictions while in office than any three combined. I know you deny that tariffs are paid by the country that enacts them, but they are. I expect you deny his trade deal fell through, it did.

That covers weak and corrupt thoroughly.

You have an established pattern of denying facts and spouting lies, so if you agreed with the truth it would instantly come into question. You saying it's 100% un true is a great indicator it's 100% correct.

Can be misleading, or can be apt. In this case, this is just one of many times Israel intentionally attacked Americans, so it's not misleading.
Also, there was only one combatant here. *facepalm

This is about how someone we call allies have acted undeniably criminally by committing multiple war crimes against us that we conspired to hide for decades, not how we treated actively aggressive enemies that attacked us and our allies first. Also, we're talking about crimes delineated in the 1949 revision and ratification of the Geneva Convention, so WW2 isn't covered. Duh.

Facts, like multiple undeniable war crimes against America, crimes that directly led to American murders, you mean?
If I find you on my street and cover you with a tarp before I beat you to death to footloose at 120 db so you can't protest, "I thought it was a known terrorist....i didn't see or hear anything to indicate it wasn't besides my friends who told me it wasn't." isn't going to work as an excuse. That's basically what we have here.

Your"illustration" is not a bit on topic, and seems like floundering excuses for the indefensible war crimes of Israel.

Kevin Bacon is pimp.

Amazing he can still dance so well. Footloose is almost as old as I am and I'm already past being able to move like that.

Kevin Bacon remains FOOTLOOSE! has been added as a related post - related requested by Trancecoach on that post.

Everybody cut FOOTLOOSE!

The basic legal point was the difference between "public" and "non-public forum". Cases were quoted showing when the government -- or private enterprise -- attempted to call a place a "non-public forum" and therefore could restrict its use.

If the space in dispute was ill-defined, then it wasn't appropriate to call it non-public, and the government -- and private enterprise -- lost those cases.

Judge basically ruled that the Jefferson Memorial was a non-public place, and therefore the Park Service had jurisdiction -- and legal precedent -- to control its use.

There were other issues of law that were in dispute, but this is the part of the opinion related to dancing, and the government's legal ability to restrict access and use.

I hope my summary is correct -- I only read it once.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

I barely had enough interest in this slacktivism to write a comment, let alone watch the videos or read 17 pages. Can you give me the abridged version? >> ^bareboards2:
Did you read the 17 pages? It is a pretty persuasive legal argument, based on precedents set by other court cases.
It also is pretty funny in places.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
To the lawmakers: Laws against dancing are silly, and not unlike the old fogies in Footloose.

I barely had enough interest in this slacktivism to write a comment, let alone watch the videos or read 17 pages. Can you give me the abridged version? >> ^bareboards2:

Did you read the 17 pages? It is a pretty persuasive legal argument, based on precedents set by other court cases.
It also is pretty funny in places.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
To the lawmakers: Laws against dancing are silly, and not unlike the old fogies in Footloose.

>> ^smooman:

should we also be allowed to have sex in front of the lincoln memorial? we wouldnt be hurting anyone.......you mean theres a law against that? REVOLUTION


EXACTLY THE SAME AS DANCING! EVERYONE CUT LOOSE! FOOTLOOSE!

Did you read the 17 pages? It is a pretty persuasive legal argument, based on precedents set by other court cases.

It also is pretty funny in places.


>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

To the lawmakers: Laws against dancing are silly, and not unlike the old fogies in Footloose.

To the lawmakers: Laws against dancing are silly, and not unlike the old fogies in Footloose.

To the protesters: Surely there are more important things to protest. (Iraq, Afghanistan, torture, foreign prisons, corporate domination of our political system, the 'Citizen's United' ruling, lack of accountability for Wall Street crime, subsidies of high fructose corn syrup during an obesity epidemic, the war on drugs, gutting of social services, the patriot act, tax givaways to corporations and the super rich during a recession, No Child Left Behind, lack of a decent health care system, the department of homeland security, indulgent military spending, gutting of consumer protections, gutting of rights for workers, the rape of the underclasses, etc.)

I'd be happy to forfeit my right to dance at national monuments in return for an end to any of the practices listed above.

^You're joking, but they actually are remaking Footloose, sadly enough.

You people are so gullable! This was just a viral for Footloose 2: Footlooser!

My sister walked into the room while I was watching this..

Sister: What's that?

Me: A bunch of people getting arrested for dancing..

Sister: Oh like footloose?

Me: I was thinking more like swing kids..

Or, "Deleted Scene from Footloose".

My new favourite video.