search results matching tag: FoS

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (45)     Sift Talk (2)     Blogs (5)     Comments (306)   

Charles Mingus Sextet - Live in Norway, 1964

Pageant mom defends daughter's hooker costume

UFO - Cylinder Chased By Russian MIG-21

Prejudice & Discrimination: Crash Course Psychology #39

Cultural Appropriation

rancor says...

Well, it certainly involves a lot more video editing work, so it's not exactly for the lazy. And if it cuts down the length of your video by 50%, I'm all for it for numerous reasons. Too much content out there, ain't nobody got time fo dat.

And I like it, so I think I'll culturally appropriate it.

Tiny Camera Explores Ant Colonies

Crane takes it out on a truck

The Big Lebowski - What happens when you FASITA

ET found in New Mexico

HBOs 'Questioning Darwin' - Creationists Talk Creationism

newtboy says...

Mostly answered in private along with the response to the private message, despite the claim that I ignore and discount private messages.
These appear to be ignored because private messages may be apologetic or reasonable, but continuing public messages are anything but. In that situation, I'll always consider the insulting public messages to trump the reasonable private ones.
MY attacks are all about your vitriolic insulting degrading denigrating style. I disagree with many of your points, but I'm never the one to start infantile name calling, even about a position. I may be disrespectful of it, but I don't start the silly, infantile name calling ridiculousness (as a rule, I may not always succeed in this). I don't know you well enough to insult you personally, except when you contradict yourself between private and public posts. I can be insulting of your positions, especially so when they are insultingly given.
I do hate people being smarmy and vulgarly insulting, especially when they then cry foul and throw tantrums if the tables are turned. Distinguish between the hate for a behavior you display and hate OF YOU and you'll be happier and feel less attacked....at least by me.
For that reason, I'm also publicly warning you that any 'private' message to me will be considered fair game from this point on, to use publicly to contradict your public stances when you are being hypocritical and/or disingenuous. That doesn't mean private personal information, unless it directly contradicts what you say in public. Fair warning.
Maned-up enough fo ya?

chingalera said:

@BoneRemake

Clear violation of official sift decorum
"You are a backwater tinfoil hat wearing twat. it is no secret here that you fit that geography. Fuck off , your stupid bullshit man.. sometimes it is just too much bullshit to take. "

....or simply assholism??

Newt, you should know fucking better and act accordingly if you have it in you to dump your ego in the toilet for a refreshing swim.

I have accepted consequences of my tirades in the past-Trying really hard to play 'NICE' children, got a few years on your "polite' asses as well. Your hate doesn't fool anyone, in fact it seethes with every comment made.

Bothof you continue to ignore or otherwise discount sincere private messages, yet you come out in public to try and destroy my opinions and observations with personal attacks. what's up with that, eh??

Man-up why dontchas?

Oakland CA Is So Scary Even Cops Want Nothing To Do With It

Trancecoach says...

> "why can't 'free marketers' buy a whole country and try it out fo realizes?"

Trying dude, trying. Not so easy to buy a country these days.

> "The country and state are owned by us all, we are represented by our government (no matter how poorly)."

The government does not "represent" me in any meaningful way. This is an absurdity, plain and simple.

> "Did school not teach you how that's set up? It should have."

Another thing you learned in private school?

> "Thank you, the implication that I'm unworthy of discussion with, then continued discussion was at best, odd."

Yes it is.

> "I'm saying we can make it better if we elect better reps"

No you can't. But like I said, go ahead and prove it. I'm not stopping you.

> "I agree that there's too much 'governing' with far too little result, but I disagree that the answer is to stop governing."

Again, go for whatever 'solution' you think is best. I'm not stopping you. I'm also not participating in it, obviously, as long as it seems like a ridiculous idea.

> "I say the present government sucks, and sucks worse in some places than others."

See? Even we can agree on one thing.

> "I agree that there's too much 'governing' with far too little result"

Two things.

Look, if you're pro taxes, pro police/military, but not a "statist" and consider yourself a (former) libertarian, then perhaps you're an Objectivist or a Randian. Randians would think that Oakland has a "shitty" government but that a right-wing one would be good and necessary. Rand did not call herself a libertarian and rather hated 'anarchists'.

newtboy said:

...

Oakland CA Is So Scary Even Cops Want Nothing To Do With It

newtboy says...

If you change your citizenship to wherever you move they can't tax you anymore...why can't 'free marketers' buy a whole country and try it out fo realsies?
The country and state are owned by us all, we are represented by our government (no matter how poorly). Did school not teach you how that's set up? It should have.
You are saying it SHOULD be all private, which would make it the same thing with no recourse to move out of it, just to different controllers, the new one's not even elected or replaceable. Bad move.
Thank you, the implication that I'm unworthy of discussion with, then continued discussion was at best, odd.
I say the present government sucks, and sucks worse in some places than others. I'm saying we can make it better if we elect better reps, but never perfect for everyone, just not possible. I agree that there's too much 'governing' with far too little result, but I disagree that the answer is to stop governing.
I am surrounded by both cool people and losers, but we're spread out enough that it's easier to ignore the losers from here. I got lucky.
I do, I vote. That's how it's set up to be done, if people were more thoughtful, it would work better.
I only pointed out my situation because you had apparently decided I'm a worthless taker, and that's a mistaken assumption (but an understandable one, I'm odd).
Are you saying I said that 'who cares what you think'? because I never meant to. If you are saying that yourself, that's a problem for rational discussion.
I have little love for the state, but I do see a need for some actual 'higher power' (religious one's don't cut it) to further society in less harmful directions.
If you feel a discussion is me forcing beliefs on you, that's just sad to me. To me, that means you're closed to any discussion that's not preaching to your choir, or to put it another way, you're only interested in mental masturbation, no distractions.
There are degrees of being 'left alone'...just as there are degrees of 'able to do anything that doesn't HARM another'...it's about where you draw the line of 'left alone' or 'harm another'...we obviously draw it in differing places, I'm OK with that.

Trancecoach said:

> "By your logic, taxes are voluntary, you can choose not to live in the US and you don't get thrown in jail for not paying them."

Not true at all. The US will tax you wherever you live. "If you don't like it move" is totally different from "if you don't like it, don't buy this condo." The condo has an owner selling it under some conditions. The "country" or "state" has no "owner" whatever you might think.

> "Again, you claim you don't care about my thoughts, but you continue to prove you do by responding"

I grant you that.

> "but we do have control, we simply need to assert it in thoughtful ways, not react out of fear of the possible future. That's my viewpoint anyway."

You say government sucks and yet, you say something to the effect of, "It doesn't feel that way from where I sit, at my reserved table at the Bohemian Grove, surrounded by cool people, not you losers."

Go ahead and "control" the government. Like I said, no one's stopping you. Do whatever you want from your beautiful acre of orchard and 100% paid for home. Enjoy it.

And if you don't like my tax ideas, who cares what you think?

However you justify your love for the state, that's ok. You're entitled to it. You aren't entitled to any actions that attempt to force your beliefs on me or anyone. Of course you'll try. But as Satochi Nakamoto (or any plutocrat) has (implicitly) said: :-P Good luck with that.

It seems more and more that libertarians and plutocrats, while not in agreement about means, do share the same goal: to be left alone by "the people."

Shirley Temple Black ~ April 23, 1928 – February 10, 2014

Eloquent Reporter talks Ford with Jon Stewart-2

The 4 Most Insulting TV Ads you see Every Christmas



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon