"2010 can't get here fast enough."

Keep telling yourself that QM. If all you've got is your dreams, I don't want to be the one to spoil it for you.

You won't spoil anything. The idiots have already punished themselves and the rest of America by electing a clueless community activist. It may take 20% unemployment to wake up the rest, but change is coming, my friends.

QM, how come you can't express an opinion without sophomoric name-calling?

Ask the same question over at Daily Kos and Huff Post. More perfect terms speed along the message in today's ADD environment. For example, by using "Taxocrat" instead of "Democrat" I don't have to explain every time that the Democratic solution for all problems is to raise taxes.

You're, if I'm not mistaken, among the oldest members of this site (referring to your age, not your time as a member) and yet you're also among the worst, most childish debaters.

It's not the flavor you're upset with, it's that I'm serving you something that's not on the menu. Unlike your unionized teachers, kollij proffs, goofball gangstaz, hollywood and enter-stainers like Colbertowitz, I have nothing to gain by lying to you about life and consequences, and as I like to point out from time to time, if you can present facts that prove liberal policies do anything but make life harder for a much wider swath of the population than they claim to help, I'm all ears.


And how can you seriously post a CNN clip? Aren't they the Communist News Network? Isn't everything they say a lie? Shouldn't we just ignore this as anti-American propaganda?

Dobbs--not a favorite of liberals, a proponent of lawful borders and therefore a "racist"--isn't making stuff up here like some Olbermann, he's reading off an actual proposed bill. That's what's truly frightening.

I get all of my news from the Internet, even the news I don't like.


Democracy now, TNR, the libaral Daily Kos (I even have the founders book!), and more conservative Libertarian documents.

You should write for the Daily Kos. All emotion and no logic. Really great stuff.

But your idiotic rant aside and back to my original point, which you failed to address. Even if the right is in fact "W R O N G" does this mean their protests are inherently "angry". Are the protests from the right not as constitutional as the protests from the left? Why is it that the left is fully behind protests that further their agenda but consistently argue against the right protesting?

I don't expect you to answer any of these questions. That would involve thinking rather than foaming at the mouth and spouting nonsensical arguments.

A good article at Daily Kos on how to stop 'the angry mobs' from disrupting town-hall meetings:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/8/4/761608/-Tea-Baggers-FAIL-to-disrupt-Health-Care-meeting,-lessons-shared.

I especially like this quote from a statement given before a town-hall meeting:
"So know this: efforts to disrupt and thwart public discourse on civic matters are profoundly anti-democratic."

There is no viable left wing in this country. Whatever existed was wiped out in the 1930s.

I guess it depends on what you mean by 'left wing'. But can you honestly look Obama, Pelosi, Ried, Kennedy, ACORN, Daily Kos, and all the other myriad special interest groups that comprises the modern neo-lib movement and call them anything but 'left wing'? Only people who are thoroughly biased towards the left would see such groups and consider them 'centrist'.

News Updates...
Even the democrat run CBO says Obama's plan would result in no savings...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25415.html#ixzz0MQb9vTLi

5 Key freedoms you will LOSE under Obamacare...
http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/24/news/economy/health_care_reform_obama.fortune/index.htm

Top Democrat demands that Congress pass the bill WITHOUT READING IT...
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=51610&print=on

Ha! That made me LOL. Too bad others can't see the humor, even if they disagree with your opinions. *smugly pats self on back*

In reply to this comment by quantumushroom:
But who can blame QM for being a bit antsy, being forced to live in the buttcrack of an 650 lb gorilla would make anyone a bit tetchy now and again.

You don't have to suck up to liberalsifters to get your stars, n00b. But, the more time you spend here, the less time for daily kos.

But who can blame QM for being a bit antsy, being forced to live in the buttcrack of an 650 lb gorilla would make anyone a bit tetchy now and again.

You don't have to suck up to liberalsifters to get your stars, n00b. But, the more time you spend here, the less time for daily kos.

Thanks to the professional posters for the Daily Kos-tic. You are like that last turd you have to squeeze out in order to complete a shit. Hold on, I'm flushing.

>> ^srd:
shrug The pendulum swings. There were enough left wing nutters screaming right-wing conspiracy during the Bush years. Now the right wing nutters are screaming.


There was nothing nutty about how the Bush's stole Florida and how the conservatives on the Supreme Court ram-rodded junior down our throats.

There was nothing nutty about how every major media outlet beat the drums of war that lead us into Iraq.

There is nothing nutty about Scaife orchestrating the witch-hunts that lead to Clinton having to apologize for having a stupid blowjob, or how more money was spent on that than on investigating 9/11.

Fuck the conservative cock-suckers.

It's time they got a taste of their own medicine.

/em strangles self over sheer idiocy of rotty's post.

/em dies

/em welcomes the peace of the grave

>> ^Rotty:
Oh yeah. Uberass, you have no left wing afilliations. Nor does that harpy you mention. You're all just "reporters". Well, life wouldn't be the same without the Daily Kos-tic. So. keep preaching and your bullsit will spread here by the normal professional posters. Not to worry.

Oh yeah. Uberass, you have no left wing afilliations. Nor does that harpy you mention. You're all just "reporters". Well, life wouldn't be the same without the Daily Kos-tic. So. keep preaching and your bullsit will spread here by the normal professional posters. Not to worry.

^No history book I've ever read has Jefferson as the founder of the Dem party. Either way, it's misinformation to say he's the founder. Period.

I don't think anyone said if the platform is different, then the party is different. Not sure where you got that. It's the party of Jackson.

Quick bit of trivia. Do you know why your party has the donkey? Andrew Jackson was referred to as Andrew Jackass by some of his "enemies", and he liked it so much he made it the official mascot of the party. I bet you won't find that in your Daily Kos history books.

^My facts are opinions? Or are yours revisionist?

I'm sorry if Daily Kos or the Huffington Post claim Jefferson started the Democratic Party, but that's simply not correct. It's okay to take the Andrew Jackson lumps for your party, because the party has changed significantly since then. Also has the Republican Party.

And, to be fair, the Republican Party is also considered to be a descendant of the Democratic Republican Party. To me, all of this wishful pining for the connection to Jefferson and Madison's original party is foolish for both the major parties. Even if their distant ancestry shows they are related to that party, that's like me claiming kinship to Daniel Boone because we all came from the same gene pool.

You wrote: "It's still the good old party Jefferson started, though."

If you're trying to draw some comparison between any of the two major parties and the old Jeffersonian Principles of yesteryear, I don't think that would be a successful venture for anyone.

"MSNBC: The Son of Fox News."

Hardly possible with people like Chris Mathews and Keith Uberass. Perhaps the poster didn't realize that cNBC and msNBC have the same parent network: NBC. MSNBC has a huch more liberal slant than FOX. This would be evident by viewing the abundant posts here from career-posters supported by the Daily Kos-tic.

>> ^volumptuous:

Fail. This is why you're a bottom. Ron Paul is against the War on Drugs, against prohibition of any drug (medicinal or otherwise), against the Patriot Act and against the war in Iraq. I'm not sure where you are getting your facts: Daily Kos? But, they're all wrong.

I guess if you say a lie long enough and loud enough those too ignorant to do research will just believe it, huh?

I'm not sure about Wicca in the military or Clinton's impeachment. I will go on the record as saying I just don't know where RP stands or stood on those.

but, let's be honest, if Obama was in the lead at the top of this silly poll all would be peaceful and quiet in here. Ron Paul isn't president, so chill out. Your guy won, dude. Take a deep breath. Enjoy it. No need to lie. It's just a silly poll.

>> ^NetRunner:

I'm not against government's existence. More delicious words. Om nom nom. I believe it limited government and follow the Jeffersonian principles of government.