😝

...and says, "Look at me, I'm rougy! Where's Obamarx?"

>> ^rougy:

George W. Bush walks into a room.
His supporters stand.
His detractors turn their backs.
QM drops to his knees, opens mouth, sticks out tongue, closes eyes....

George W. Bush walks into a room.

His supporters stand.

His detractors turn their backs.

QM drops to his knees, opens mouth, sticks out tongue, closes eyes....

*gets excited about watching the current No 1 ranking sift*

*clicks on the big arrow to play*

"Sorry, this video is unavailable form your location"

...

*puts mouse down calmly, closes eyes and takes a deep breath*

.........

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU......

Do tell. I am open to actually changing my points of view (I have done so since I was born on things like race, sexual orientation and such) but I must know reason.

In the cut throat world, I simply bring up "don't complain in the big boy/girl ring." If you do, then stay out of the ring.

Is the catcall right, mature, a positive? Of course not. It is fucking childish. But neither is half the shit thrown at Obama, or Bill Clinton or John McCain. Obama was basically accused of trying to teach really underage children sex. That, I would assume, is worse than a catcall.

Again, is it wrong of them to do so? Of course--and yet people are face palming this statement just because I attach the fact that politicans are scum, and expect this behavior, and stop complainig... I want to hear why.

>> ^EvilDeathBee:

>> ^Lawdeedaw:
>> ^hpqp:
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Wait? So because Wong can't handle the big girl world of politics we make a fuss about this??? Booho,o he was sexist. And? That's real world when people get off the playground. You fight dirty, you use all the tools to crush the weak---it's probably how Wong got to where she got in politics. Dirty shit...
God forbid she live in Africa (Where women are raped and mutilated every day) or combat (Where their limits are tested) or even women's baseball (Where she could be hit by a ball...)

For shame.

Why? See the comment above to understand why I said what I said. If you still stand up for someone who sensationalizes in politics, then go for it. Also, if you can tell me that the male lawmaker isn't scum to everyone (Men and women) then that makes him sexist. Otherwise, it just makes him a "politician."

raise palm to forehead, close eyes, sigh, lower head. Begin shaking head

>> ^Lawdeedaw:

>> ^hpqp:
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Wait? So because Wong can't handle the big girl world of politics we make a fuss about this??? Booho,o he was sexist. And? That's real world when people get off the playground. You fight dirty, you use all the tools to crush the weak---it's probably how Wong got to where she got in politics. Dirty shit...
God forbid she live in Africa (Where women are raped and mutilated every day) or combat (Where their limits are tested) or even women's baseball (Where she could be hit by a ball...)

For shame.

Why? See the comment above to understand why I said what I said. If you still stand up for someone who sensationalizes in politics, then go for it. Also, if you can tell me that the male lawmaker isn't scum to everyone (Men and women) then that makes him sexist. Otherwise, it just makes him a "politician."


*raise palm to forehead, close eyes, sigh, lower head. Begin shaking head*

Mr Colbert has made comments over the years about "rules" he has with his wife. They were mentioned when Jane Fonda sat on his lap and kissed him on the lips -- that broke the rules, a clearly uncomfortable Mr Colbert mentioned at the time.

I can't even BEGIN to imagine how this fits within the "rules"!!!!!



>> ^arvana:

I would guess that Stephen's wife was keeping a pretty close eye on the proceedings...

>> ^arvana:

I would guess that Stephen's wife was keeping a pretty close eye on the proceedings...


As was the video editor.... I'm sure there are a few gems we missed out on because of his job.

I would guess that Stephen's wife was keeping a pretty close eye on the proceedings...

>> ^srd:

While I appreciate the lecturers disappointment, I do believe he needs to get out more. In my professional experience the business types are all about cheating, cutting corners and taking shortcuts if such an opportunity is offered to them. And if you're teaching future business/managerial types, this kind of behaviour is only to be expected.
What I don't get is what a four hour ethics course is supposed to do. If you're inclined to cheat by laziness, lack of character or wrong upbringing, a few hours of stern talking to by someone who the culprits don't give a rats anus about isn't going to change much, other than waste everyones time. If someone is prone to cheating, the only way to stop them is to keep a close eye on them. Or a real long term effort to readjust their moral compass. Something that isn't easy at that age anymore though.


Especially since what our society teaches us is to screw others and cheat to get ahead. Because it doesn't matter how you get there...it's just that you get there.

While I appreciate the lecturers disappointment, I do believe he needs to get out more. In my professional experience the business types are all about cheating, cutting corners and taking shortcuts if such an opportunity is offered to them. And if you're teaching future business/managerial types, this kind of behaviour is only to be expected.

What I don't get is what a four hour ethics course is supposed to do. If you're inclined to cheat by laziness, lack of character or wrong upbringing, a few hours of stern talking to by someone who the culprits don't give a rats anus about isn't going to change much, other than waste everyones time. If someone is prone to cheating, the only way to stop them is to keep a close eye on them. Or a real long term effort to readjust their moral compass. Something that isn't easy at that age anymore though.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Anime, Bludgeon, Big Mouth, Closed Eyes, I Love Anime' to 'Anime, Bludgeon, Big Mouth, Closed Eyes, I Love Anime, supershort' - edited by Kevlar

When two ships meet at sea they dont play chicken until theyve determined the comparative tonnages.

It doesn't take a very close eye to tell the difference between a seadoo, a medium sized powered boat and a large ocean vessel. It's pretty safe to say in this case both sides were aware of the significant differences.

The give-way vessel (whalers) must take early and substantial action to keep well clear.
The stand-on vessel (trimaran) may take action to avoid collision if it becomes clear that the give-way vessel is not taking appropriate action.

And from this clip we have no idea what early action the whalers took. I made it through one episode of the show following the Sea Shepherd crew, and if that was any indication at all you can be certain that the trimaran did everything in it's power to get directly in the way of the whalers ship. They are the ones who's entire method IS based on playing chicken with the whalers vessels. They call their small boats like this their 'attack' craft for pity sake.

When you've got a small agile craft trying to collide and otherwise mess with a ship this much larger, the blame for what happens is entirely on the smaller agile ship, the larger ship couldn't avoid a collision without going to full stop and waiting for the trimaran to go away. Experience shows that even if they do full stop the trimaran's crew will then try to board them. I don't blame them for not going to full stop every time these guys try to attack and threaten them.

I will be keeping a close eye on you, human.

In reply to this comment by demon_ix:
He's far too busy kicking people from the lounge at random, recently. We're planning a mutiny to replace the old tin-can with a brand new digital sorting machine. Shhhhhh!!!!

The SALVIA Experiential Rating Scale

Level - 1 "S" stands for SUBTLE effects. A feeling that "something" is happening, although it is difficulty to say just what. Relaxation and increased sensual appreciation may be noted. This mild level is useful for meditation and may facilitate sexual pleasure.

Level - 2 "A" stands for ALTERED perception. Colors and textures are more pronounced. Appreciation of music may be enhanced. Space may appear of greater or lesser depth than is usual. But visions do not occur at this level. Thinking becomes less logical, and more playful; short-term memory difficulties may be noted.

Level - 3 "L" stands for LIGHT visionary state. Closed-eye visuals (clear imagery with eyes closed: fractal patterns, vine-like and geometric patterns, visions of objects and designs). The imagery is often two dimensional. If open-eyed visual effects occur, these are usually vague and fleeting. At this level, phenomena similar to the hypnagogic phenomena that some people experience at sleep onset occur. At this level, visions are experienced as "eye candy" but are not confused with reality.

Level - 4 "V" stands for VIVID visionary state. Complex three-dimensional realistic appearing scenes occur. Sometimes voices may be heard. With eyes open, contact with consensual reality will not be entirely lost, but when you close your eyes you may forget about consensus reality and enter completely into a dreamlike scene. Shamanistic journeying to other lands--foreign or imaginary; encounters with beings (entities, spirits) or travels to other ages may occur. You may even live the life of another person. At this level you have entered the shaman's world. Or if you prefer: you are in "dream time." With eyes closed, you experience fantasies (dream like happenings with a story line to them). So long as your eyes are closed you may believe they are really occurring. This differs from the "eye candy" closed-eye imagery, of level 3.

Level - 5 "I" stands for IMMATERIAL existence. At this level one may no longer be aware of having a body. Consciousness remains and some thought processes are still lucid, but one becomes completely involved in inner experience and looses all contact with consensual reality. Individuality may be lost; one experiences merging with God/dess, mind, universal consciousness, or bizarre fusions with other objects--real or imagined (e.g. experiences such as merging with a wall or piece of furniture). At this level it is impossible to function in consensual reality, but unfortunately some people do not remain still but move around in this befuddled state. For this reason a sitter is essential to ensure the safety of someone voyaging to these deep levels. To the person experiencing this the phenomenon may be terrifying or exceedingly pleasant; but to an outside observer the individual may appear confused or disoriented.

Level 6 - "A" stands for AMNESIC effects. At this stage, either consciousness is lost, or at least one is unable to later recall what one had experienced. The individual may fall, or remain immobile or thrash around; somnambulistic behavior may occur. Injuries can be sustained without pain being felt; on awakening, the individual will have no recollection of what he/she did, experienced, or said in level 6. People cannot recall what they experience in this very deep trance state. This is not a desirable level, because nothing can latter be recalled of the experience.

From http://www.sagewisdom.org/usersguide.html very informative and educational source. Level 5 is where I go when I use it.