jpg1023

Member Profile


Member Since: April 10, 2009
Last Power Points used: never
Available: now
Power Points at Recharge: 1   Get More Power Points Now!

Comments to jpg1023

siftbot says...

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 14 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!


siftbot says...

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 13 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!


siftbot says...

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 12 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!


siftbot says...

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 11 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!


siftbot says...

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 10 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!


rougy says...

The old money, the big money, the trans-national corporations.

In reply to this comment by jpg1023:
In reply to this comment by rougy:
>> ^Lolthien:
What kind of world do we live in where that WON'T happen?


It's happening anyway.

Given that we have honest, compassionate people watching over things--and in America, that's never going to happen--legalization would give us the control instead of leaving it to the syndicates and, yes, the banks and other "legal" institutions who thrive on the profits of illegal drugs.

The CIA and other dirtbags make a lot of money off heroin, and they use it as a weapon, too.

Nothing is going to change because as with the Democrats and the Republicans, the difference between the DEA and the drug cartels is just an illusion, a front for the people who are really in charge.


Enlighten me, who are the people really in charge?

rougy says...

In reply to this comment by jpg1023:
In reply to this comment by rougy:
The King's English is sometimes over-rated.

you realize he is australian. last time i checked that is not the "king's" english


It's a figure of speech. I was implying that just because he wasn't as eloquent or as precise with his words as Hitchens or Rushdie, that his point was no less valid.

It would be like me discounting your sentence above because it wasn't capitalized or punctuated according to the rules.

  • 1

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists