check out how they make mcnuggests, but not if you're eating

I worked in a bread factory briefly and we put the same white bread into about 15 different bags and with a swing in price points of about 50 cents. This was about 25 years ago so the swing is probably more like a dollar or more in todays terms.

I have no sympathy for this guy or that crocodile guy.

I think the interviewer didn't know what socialism is and she ran away from it quickly.

can you see it on Google maps?

I think the focus should be on improving health. Focusing on one component of the many things that are part of good health doesn't do justice to the bigger picture.

I sure couldn't make it to 21. She was driving me nuts.

I believe that each person has a unique set of tastebuds and linkages from them back to the brain. So taking anyone's advice on what is good or bad is kind of silly. Unless of course a specific critic consistently agrees with something you like. But who has time for that? Try something on your own and if you don't like it don't get it again. Easy enough.

I don't like the phrase, 'we're pregnant'. As a man, I feel you're part of the process, but you're are obviously not pregnant. I think it kind of takes away from the woman who actually has the growing parasite in her and it's her body that's going through all the changes, and also has to do all of the right things to ensure the baby has the best chance.

why is the sundawn van and punchees car just sitting there?

My house cat can open doors in several ways so this is not surprising. He doesn't use his mouth, but I bet he would try if he was as large as these cats.

That makes sense since space is a vacuum that they would test it in a vacuum. For some reason, I was thinking it was a land based telescope. I guess those are pretty much obsolete at this point.

Thanks!

I'm wondering how long you've believed that there is climate change going on? Also, could you explain your comment on redistribution of wealth? Thanks.

I did some research and it looks like there was a rebuttal by the gas industry which was then rebutted by the film makers. This article... http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/02/24/24greenwire-groundtruthing-academy-award-nominee-gasland-33228.html?pagewanted=all explores the main points of contention which to me doesn't prove the gas companies case. They like to say that it's not the fracking process that creates problems, but the well drilling as if they are separate which they are not. The methane in the water they light on fire is said to come from a 50 year old well where the casing failed. The desire to frack is creating the need for more well drilling and increases the number of points where a problem can occur. All of these wells will eventually become 50 years old so there's not much difference in my mind. I agree, we don't have enough data to know how safe it is, but already it doesn't look safe enough to me.

I think there is already evidence of its negative consequences. Check out the movie Gasland. It shows people near a fracking site being able to light the water coming out of their tap on fire. I do agree with your point on the politicizing of this issue (and a million others) and that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle. We are too polarized and there's not enough fact seeking and sometimes refusing to believe the facts. I see the companies portraying this as safe trying to set a belief level and that then allows them to be more profitable through the externalities they create, but at the expense of the public. This has been going on forever in almost every industry and is just a normal trait of capitalism. Not to say that is right. Since you're between the two sides, does that make you a shilpie?