Wrong story. For the sixth time, this fake outrage is about the Russian water sports videos report. What did they report about THAT that was false. You still haven't answered the question.

THE WHOLE THING is FAKE.

Fail....(intentional?)
Wrong story. For the sixth time, this fake outrage is about the Russian water sports videos report. What did they report about THAT that was false. You still haven't answered the question.

Absolutely not. I have NEVER bragged about my sexual exploits at all, I was raised right, you don't kiss and tell because that's incredibly rude and disrespectful to your partner and I don't screw with women I don't have respect for....and I've never sexually assaulted one....never.

Um....Wrong. They may be suspect, Faux is simply a propaganda machine that spouts more falsehoods than truths. I've listed a number of outright lies Fox perpetrated, you ignored them all and claim there are none. Go treat the cranial rectosis and try again to address the questions with fact.

Not 12 rapes, 12 sexual assaults. Get the accusations right or you just look ignorant....Fox will do that to you.....Fox has done that to you.

First off, I think almost everybody can agree that its too bad some mothers son has been killed. I wouldnt want to minimize the loss of a human life.
But he was upto some no-good and he just happened to run into someone armed. You cant compare that to the Cold war, FFS.
Its not a cold war when the bad guy breaks into your bedroom with a butcher knife! A cold war?? If the russians would have crossed the border, in the middle of the night, into the USA armed with knives...and our forces would open fire with guns, to end the cold war, this is the manner you would hate???? really???? Bullshit!

Secondly,
"I didn't conclude that it started out as a burglary. It was hypothetical. As is the assumption he was out to kill her."
The burglary was not hypothetical , its the absolute minimum that even the most crooked lawyer could argue! We'll never know what he would've done to the young mother and her child after spending 20+ mins breaching the bedroom with his hunting knife. It would be prudent to assume it would include Robbery, assualt , rape, kidnapping, murder, multiple murder, or any combination of crimes.

I'm glad you realize that this whole ordeal does not support your anti-gun argument even after you try to compare this lunatic, kicking in doors ,armed with a 12" hunting knife, to a sneak thief running off with a TV.

And finally, Dont be sorry, you didnt ruin the mood of this story, you really just pissed on your own foot trying to to turn this into a different story.
You should be happy, there are a lot of other gunplay vids that you can scream like a litle old lady about , this just isnt it. RIP to the guy who just completly wasted his life.
>> ^Jinx:
>> ^csnel3:
>> ^Jinx:
I'm trying to imagine the tone of the news story if this happened in Europe.
I think my problem with guns is they escalate the confrontation. "Fortunately" it seems she didn't give him a chance, because a chance is a risk when there is a gun involved and it doesn't matter who's hands it happens to be in. She hesitates and he overpowers her, or he pulls his own gun and is a better aim and what started out as burglary is now a murder and that kid grows up without any parents.
I can't really condemn her actions though. Just that a guy is dead, even if it was some crook.

I'm trying to imagine WTF you're talking about. The gun didnt "escalate" the situation, it difused it. Are you ignoring the fact the guy was armed with a knife? Why is your scenario based on total fantasy instead of reality? What if she didnt have a gun, and the VERY REAL, ARMED INTRUDER murdered her. How do you come to the conclusion it started out as a burglary? He was breaking down the door armed with a 12" knife! This is a very simple story of a person protecting themselves, no need to add bunch of hypothetical BS to it. I realize that you are trying to justify your "problen with guns", but, this is the WRONG story to use as an anti-gun argument.

It escalated the situation because it was difused with a gun...you know, as in somebody is dead. How is that hard to understand 0.o. I'd hate to have the Cold War difused in the same manner.
I didn't conclude that it started out as a burglary. It was hypothetical. As is the assumption he was out to kill her.
Is this a good story to support my argument? No, not really, but then stories aren't good evidence anyway. Consider that stories where a guy breaks in, steals a TV and leaves without incident don't tend to get much media coverage.
And yes, I was justifying my position. Sorry if I ruined the mood on this success story for guns.

>> ^csnel3:

>> ^Jinx:
I'm trying to imagine the tone of the news story if this happened in Europe.
I think my problem with guns is they escalate the confrontation. "Fortunately" it seems she didn't give him a chance, because a chance is a risk when there is a gun involved and it doesn't matter who's hands it happens to be in. She hesitates and he overpowers her, or he pulls his own gun and is a better aim and what started out as burglary is now a murder and that kid grows up without any parents.
I can't really condemn her actions though. Just that a guy is dead, even if it was some crook.

I'm trying to imagine WTF you're talking about. The gun didnt "escalate" the situation, it difused it. Are you ignoring the fact the guy was armed with a knife? Why is your scenario based on total fantasy instead of reality? What if she didnt have a gun, and the VERY REAL, ARMED INTRUDER murdered her. How do you come to the conclusion it started out as a burglary? He was breaking down the door armed with a 12" knife! This is a very simple story of a person protecting themselves, no need to add bunch of hypothetical BS to it. I realize that you are trying to justify your "problen with guns", but, this is the WRONG story to use as an anti-gun argument.

It escalated the situation because it was difused with a gun...you know, as in somebody is dead. How is that hard to understand 0.o. I'd hate to have the Cold War difused in the same manner.


I didn't conclude that it started out as a burglary. It was hypothetical. As is the assumption he was out to kill her.

Is this a good story to support my argument? No, not really, but then stories aren't good evidence anyway. Consider that stories where a guy breaks in, steals a TV and leaves without incident don't tend to get much media coverage.

And yes, I was justifying my position. Sorry if I ruined the mood on this success story for guns.

>> ^Jinx:
I'm trying to imagine the tone of the news story if this happened in Europe.
I think my problem with guns is they escalate the confrontation. "Fortunately" it seems she didn't give him a chance, because a chance is a risk when there is a gun involved and it doesn't matter who's hands it happens to be in. She hesitates and he overpowers her, or he pulls his own gun and is a better aim and what started out as burglary is now a murder and that kid grows up without any parents.
I can't really condemn her actions though. Just that a guy is dead, even if it was some crook.

I'm trying to imagine WTF you're talking about. The gun didnt "escalate" the situation, it difused it. Are you ignoring the fact the guy was armed with a knife? Why is your scenario based on total fantasy instead of reality? What if she didnt have a gun, and the VERY REAL, ARMED INTRUDER murdered her. How do you come to the conclusion it started out as a burglary? He was breaking down the door armed with a 12" knife! This is a very simple story of a person protecting themselves, no need to add bunch of hypothetical BS to it. I realize that you are trying to justify your "problem with guns", but, this is the WRONG story to use as an anti-gun argument.

Wow, I already deemed Bill'O as a complete waste of space for this Universe and often wondered why in the hell John Stewart went on there (as I doubt the "camps" changed hands very little, if ever). Now I know that Bill literally missed High School and most of Junior High. His misconceptions of how the government is run is amazing.

I also like that he uses the Post Office as his example. Which happens to be one of the best run programs bar-none in the United States government--except for that wound caused/created by the Republicans in Congress the recent past. The Post Office uses no tax dollars, stamps only! They also made a profit each year until the little fiasco I mentioned were the republican Congress decided that FedEx, UPS, DHL, and other shippers had a point, so they shot the Post Office in the back which literally crippled them in ONE year--that is how horrendous the law was (look it up, it's quite the stomach churner).

Fox News is out of touch with reality and of course it doesn't matter to them as they create their own reality as they see fit. Their watchers seem to suck it in fervently and then when they repeat it to others they can't even remember Fox News's version, so they create yet another version of an already, completely wrong story (assuming there was a story to begin with).

Of course, Alan can barely point out to Bill that he's wrong and he still lets him finish the sentence making him look atleast safe in the "no fact zone" to his loyal flagellating viewers. Alan really is "Droopy Dog" as pointed out in comedy pieces, it's pathetic how close he is to that character. When you have someone by the throat like that and you basically let him get away by shaking your head in disapproval and saying, "Well that's just not...quite...right.....".


A small secondary story about our current modern lies pertaining to the "Fox News" way of life is recent attack ads from a "Democratic Super PAC" (if I remember right, I need to find out for sure--if I find it in time I'll change it in here) going after Mitt Romney (if I can find a good news link for this story I'll sift it--CBS had this story I saw). Current attack ads are going after Mitt Romney because he went to France on his Mormon mission a long time ago, but from that Mitt has kept up with French affairs, speaks fluent French and overall I can't see this as being a negative AT ALL (it's a positive in anyones book except for whoever ran the ad). Anyway, they of course are attacking him by saying that by having such close relations with the French he must of course be liberal... BUT, the "Fox News" part of this story is while the ad is running it has scenes were Mitt is talking in French to some people, down below it is being translated and what he is saying is further proof that he is an out right near liberal, certainly not Republican. Of course, CBS decided, just for the hell, of it they would have the ad translated by a French translator. They found that whoever made the ad was not only being disingenuous about his relation with the French people, but the translation done by the ad makers did not match what they were saying...

Pathetic... And it works, because people either don't think they have enough time to bother to care, they are literally just to stupid (I hate to say that, but it's very true and it can be dangerous), or worse of all they are more than smart enough and have the time, but just like Fox News they are the evil in this world. Our political system is dead, what the hell are we supposed to do about that other than Revolution?!

Either it's a guard bear, or you've linked the wrong story there, @Krupo

Tags for this video have been changed from 'moss, roy, jen, drunk, stories, wrong story' to 'moss, roy, jen, drunk, stories, wrong story, faux pas' - edited by rasch187