"'cause"... don't forget the apostrofe... it means you left some letters out.>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

Cause knowing is half the battle.
>> ^thegrimsleeper:
Stephen Fry

>> ^SlipperyPete:
Whose

>> ^BoneRemake:

>> ^thegrimsleeper:
Stephen Fry

I could care less how he/you spell it

Well, if you could care less, then perhaps probably care enough to change it, no?

(;

Cause knowing is half the battle.

>> ^thegrimsleeper:

Stephen Fry


>> ^SlipperyPete:

Whose

One of those is his name, the other is not.
>> ^BoneRemake:

>> ^thegrimsleeper:
Stephen Fry

" Stephen or Steven (pronounced /ˈstiːvən/) is a masculine first name, derived from the Greek name Στέφανος (Stephanos) meaning "crown, garland", "
I could care less how he/you spell it, I spell it how I spell it as well, Sixty percent of the time Wikipedia is right 100 percent.

Come on, now. We don't need another Westy spelling everything wrong for the hell of it. >> ^BoneRemake:

>> ^thegrimsleeper:
Stephen Fry

" Stephen or Steven (pronounced /ˈstiːvən/) is a masculine first name, derived from the Greek name Στέφανος (Stephanos) meaning "crown, garland", "
I could care less how he/you spell it, I spell it how I spell it as well, Sixty percent of the time Wikipedia is right 100 percent.

>> ^thegrimsleeper:

Stephen Fry


" Stephen or Steven (pronounced /ˈstiːvən/) is a masculine first name, derived from the Greek name Στέφανος (Stephanos) meaning "crown, garland", "

I could care less how he/you spell it, I spell it how I spell it as well, Sixty percent of the time Wikipedia is right 100 percent.

Haha. I love it. Are there more?

Is the rest of Fast and Loose like this? I miss Whose Line It Is Anyways.

That study is from 2005, and FOX has climbed quite a few steps on the crazy-ladder since then

Research says otherwise. The News channels have not become more radical, but the AUDIENCES have become more polarized.

http://people-press.org/report/215/news-audiences-increasingly-politicized

So your assertion is merely an opinion, not documented fact. I have been around a long time, including since 2005, and there has been no perceptable widening of the gap in bias between MSNBC or FOX News as cable channels.

Secondly this was an American study. From the outside, to the rest of the world, FOX and its fans look like bewildered extremists with little or no idea what goes on outside their own, largely imaginary, world.

There is no research study or scholarly document that supports your assertion. You may believe this is fact, but that does not make you correct. You are citing anecdotal evidence from among your group of friends and associates. You clearly tilt to the left in your political opinions, and so it is not surprising your friends & associates agree with you. However - your universe of interactions is not statistically representative of larger populations, and so your opinion must be dismissed as non-factual. The same applies to your opinions about AGW, and other issues about which you opine, but do not document. In other words - you're acting like FOX News and stating opinion as fact. For shame.

Your insinuations that I'm some sort of brainwashed leftist is very strange.

I didn't say that. I said you're a leftist, and that you slant your opinions that direction. That much is obvious. I'm clearly conservative, and I tilt that direction. There is nothing wrong in admitting your propensities and predilictions.

We don't really have partisan lines like that

No offense - but bull feathers. European parlimentarian politics is some of the most partisan, fractous, splintered, and contentous that exist on the planet. Next you'll be trying to tell me that the UN doesn't have partisan lines either. :eyeroll:

Anyway - the fact remains that FOX News is not as 'radical' as you claim. You are probably talking very specifically with people like Glenn Beck in your mind. I'm not trying to tell you that Beck isn't out there. But Ed Schultz is 'out there' too. I dismiss your false appeals to authority as a fallacy, and rest on the proof of research. Most news outlets are predominantly liberal in bias. FOX News is conservative in bias. But FOX is not some sort of radical outlier except in the fact that it isn't slavishly biased to the left like everyone else.

What you claim is 'craziness' is merely your own mental unhappiness over the existence of a dissenting perspective in a cable news universe that is otherwise homogenously oriented towards slavishly mirroring your own personal bias. Quite literally, FOX is a fly in your ideological ointment and its existence irks you. Rather than seek to dismiss it, you should welcome it as a much needed counterbalance to a milquetoast news industry that all too often does nothing but circle-jerk around a single opinion.

>> ^ulysses1904:

They had some good moments on this show.


They had many, not some!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'chucky, whos line is it anyway, make a date, bald guys, improv, rhyme, date' to 'chucky, whose line is it anyway, make a date, bald guys, improv, rhyme, date' - edited by Kevlar

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Whos line is it anyway, German, millionaire, SHUT UP PIG, accent, free style, improv' to 'Whose line is it anyway, German, millionaire, SHUT UP PIG, accent, free style, improv' - edited by Kevlar

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Santa, improvisation, improv, press conference, santa claus, whos line is it anyway' to 'Santa, improvisation, improv, press conference, santa claus, whose line is it anyway' - edited by Kevlar

Whose Line Is It Anyway?

Whose Line is it Anyway Playlist 

Lots more Whose Line