I've been wondering where Ceiling Cat got too. Seems he's using Closed Circuit web cams to watch you masturbate now.

>> ^deathcow:
how the hell can i do my job without one of these, they have effectively bound my wrists and feet now

I personally have 3 of these on my desk. I don't know how anyone does without.

Now, where did I place my 33 mega-pixel web-cam?

Tags for this video have been changed from 'apple store, web cam, show' to 'apple store, web cam, show, eminem' - edited by Trancecoach

rougy, I think you're getting a little out of control big guy. Cyber-bullying is a serious problem and I find your threats kind of disturbing. And YES, at age 11 my parents sure the fuck DID know where I was every minute of every day. And I don't think many of us over 25 owned web cams at 11 years old. Of course I had other problems and I wasn't a perfect kid, but I'm 99% sure I didn't tell anyone they should put a gun in their mouth and blow their brains out. I'll have to check with my folks but I really don't think so.

>> ^mentality:

>> ^rougy:
^ Hey! Why stop there!
Keep them locked in the closet and feed them through a doggie door.
Maybe you forgot what it was to be like when you were eleven (11) years old.
I'm sure your folks knew where you were and what you were doing every minute of the day.

How does not buying your kids a web cam, and getting a web filter so they don't go on websites like 4chan = controlling your kids all the time? your comment seems ridiculous.


You're a cunt.

>> ^rougy:

^ Hey! Why stop there!
Keep them locked in the closet and feed them through a doggie door.
Maybe you forgot what it was to be like when you were eleven (11) years old.
I'm sure your folks knew where you were and what you were doing every minute of the day.


How does not buying your kids a web cam, and getting a web filter so they don't go on websites like 4chan = controlling your kids all the time? your comment seems ridiculous.

"Let's think about it a minute. If BP/the gov't gives carte blanche for all reporters, what's going to happen? The next day they're going to have thousands of reporters standing in the way of the actual work being done. All of the workers will be talking to reporters instead of working. They will create a disruption."

Yes, because workers are to ignorant to say "Mr. Reporter, I'm here to do a job, and cant talk now."? Reporters, generally are an intelligent lot (except for Fox News reporters...). They'll keep out of the way. They might even ask to help, if only to explain to the general public what the task is like to do. Reporters would not cause any disruptions, unless someone is doing something illegal in the first place. Last I checked, 'Freedom of the Press' trumps corporate shannanigans.

"I'm not defending BP for the oil spill at all, but having a little fucking common sense, people. The media does have access. There's a web cam on the spill itself for Christs' sake. That does NOT mean any random person can just walk right up to it and get in the way. It's no difference than me going to the White House, and after being denied access, claiming that because of that, they have something to hide."

Is that camera in place due to the press? Or by BP? Did BP do that, in the goodness of its corporate heart? Or threaten? And if some random person can just, as you say '...walk right up to it and get in the way." You do realize, that camera is about a mile UNDER THE WATER? Do you have any idea, how much pressure is exerted on the human body, a mile under water? I think it is safe to say, NO ONE, not even Aquaman, will be 'wandering' up to the pump or the camera, looking at the pump. And you can claim your a reporter, and show up at the White House. And if your not on the approved listed of people, from a creditible news agency, they'll laugh in your face, as they should. There are news reporters at the White House on a daily basis.

And yes, you *ARE* defending BP, since, you did start your comment off 'bitching' at hippies.

"Also, take a look at that shot. It's dead. There's not a ton of reporters there. Everyone knows the rules"

There's not alot of reporters there, BECAUSE, as the reporter (that black guy you say), pointed out: BP doesn't want reporters monitoring, studying, and observing how it does things. So, if BP doesn't want that, it will do what it can to keep said reporters away from reporting anything, including the truth.

"Do keep this in mind one day when you finally go over the edge, and after mowing down half a school's worth of kids in your Prius after a hella cocaine bender, the media can't follow you right into your place of work because you too enjoy protections like the workers of BP! Isn't America wonderful."

Ah yes, the confusing ramblings of a conservative Republican. Only in America, do we have a whole section of our population that can ignore reality for their version of 'Fantasy Land'. Reporters can't follow me in to where I work, because its....PRIVATE PROPERTY. A PUBLIC BEACH, is just that. Its OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. Maybe you should go look up the definations of the words 'private' and 'public' as its refers to property. You might be enlightened.

I understand the need to keep people from the work areas and allowing the work to continue unhindered. I even understand preventing the guy from approaching the rest area to some degree. But there are ways to deal with it that don't involve what is being shown in this video. They could simply barricade the area, post signs to keep the unauthorized out, and have their guards escort anyone off who enters the area without authorization.

But that is implying that they have the right to do that, which a lot of these areas are public locations. If they had the power it would be announced on the news and radio, and posted to keep away from these areas until announced otherwise. And that would be the best way to deal with the problem of camera men and the public at large, and made it a crime at the same time giving more deterrent. Except that I don't think they want to keep all the public from within speaking range of the workers, they just want to keep the people with cameras away. If it were truly dangerous to the public at large, it would be done by now. And we all know the public at large can't keep from driving through construction sites without barricades, avoiding uncovered man hole covers without barricades, and dealing with much of anything out of the normal where they can stick their nose to find out what's going on (don't those rubberneckers just piss you off? Especially when they drift all over the place.)

And this isn't just actual work sites they are preventing people from going to and filming. There are plenty of videos of the COAST GUARD stopping people from filming and exploring the coast line from sea because BP said so with no other reason than that. No booms were in place, there was absolutely nothing but oil coated coastline and dead/dying birds, sea life, etc.

And Im rather curious that there isn't a lot of personal footage being shot from people's own land of the mess and sent to these news networks to be aired, but I suspect that is being discouraged in another unknown manner as of yet.

As a sidenote: BP has been putting out low ball estimated reports for the leak, that webcam is underwater with no real frame of reference for the public. Without scale, that thing could be a pin prick in a garden hose or the size of that sink hole in Chile. They've since repositioned the camera a little to give better footage, but scale is still pretty hard to judge if you don't know how big the items being shown are. It's kinda like the realtors who like to shoot everything with that fish eye lens that warps everything out of shape to make it appear bigger...wasting your time looking at that shit since it could have been taken in a barbie house for all you know.


Coast Guard with BP guys stop reporters trying to check out oil covered location..they say it's not their rules by BP's rules "under threat of arrest".

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/19/bp-coast-guard-officers-b_n_581779.html

Hadn't seen this one myself yet...it's even more apparent that they are blocking media exclusively...even from flying over:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/us/10access.html


Common sense and critical thinking tell me that they don't want the public at large getting pissed off and pressuring Congress to actually punish the company. The longer they can keep the illusion alive that the problem isn't horrifically bad, the more time they have to let the oil sink under the surface of the water and clean up those beaches...so it won't look as bad as it truly is. Oh and the illusion helps keep their stock prices up, if the clean up outlook is grim...their stock prices will tank. Can't have that happening. If they can keep the stock up, and Congress off their back...they'll only be out up to 75 mil in damages when the lawsuits start coming in...pretty nifty deal with the government contracts already having paid them 800+ million this year.

And upon watching it again, the supervisor gave the media permission to approach the rest areas (after the guards denied it, didn't ask the supervisor at any point as well) to see if the workers would speak to them. The security guards told them not to and continued to do so until they spoke for themselves. At which point the reporter thanked them for cleaning up the beaches and left. And as for the "deadness" of the shots, they didn't shoot much beyond the guards blocking access and their attempt to ask workers to speak to them. We don't know how many people the guards have chased off with or without the authority to do so under the law.

>> ^BrknPhoenix:

Please do re-read your hippie comments and reflect for a bit. These things are why you are throwing fire on an Internet website and not making actual decisions.
Let's think about it a minute. If BP/the gov't gives carte blanche for all reporters, what's going to happen? The next day they're going to have thousands of reporters standing in the way of the actual work being done. All of the workers will be talking to reporters instead of working. They will create a disruption.
I'm not defending BP for the oil spill at all, but having a little fucking common sense, people. The media does have access. There's a web cam on the spill itself for Christs' sake. That does NOT mean any random person can just walk right up to it and get in the way. It's no difference than me going to the White House, and after being denied access, claiming that because of that, they have something to hide.
Also, take a look at that shot. It's dead. There's not a ton of reporters there. Everyone knows the rules. These douchebags know the rules too. They're deliberately trying to stir shit up by asking questions to "Rent-a-cops" about what the CEO of the company says, and making unreasonable demands about going onto a work-site.
Do keep this in mind one day when you finally go over the edge, and after mowing down half a school's worth of kids in your Prius after a hella cocaine bender, the media can't follow you right into your place of work because you too enjoy protections like the workers of BP! Isn't America wonderful.
The steps go like this. Step 1) Think critically. Step 2) Lynch. Not the other way around.

Please do re-read your hippie comments and reflect for a bit. These things are why you are throwing fire on an Internet website and not making actual decisions.

Let's think about it a minute. If BP/the gov't gives carte blanche for all reporters, what's going to happen? The next day they're going to have thousands of reporters standing in the way of the actual work being done. All of the workers will be talking to reporters instead of working. They will create a disruption.

I'm not defending BP for the oil spill at all, but having a little fucking common sense, people. The media does have access. There's a web cam on the spill itself for Christs' sake. That does NOT mean any random person can just walk right up to it and get in the way. It's no difference than me going to the White House, and after being denied access, claiming that because of that, they have something to hide.

Also, take a look at that shot. It's dead. There's not a ton of reporters there. Everyone knows the rules. These douchebags know the rules too. They're deliberately trying to stir shit up by asking questions to "Rent-a-cops" about what the CEO of the company says, and making unreasonable demands about going onto a work-site.

Do keep this in mind one day when you finally go over the edge, and after mowing down half a school's worth of kids in your Prius after a hella cocaine bender, the media can't follow you right into your place of work because you too enjoy protections like the workers of BP! Isn't America wonderful.

The steps go like this. Step 1) Think critically. Step 2) Lynch. Not the other way around.

Wow. You really bring out the fact that she is renouncing the subjugation of females in Muslim society by your incessant laser focus on her femininity. It makes you seem so intelligent how you think an intelligent and sexy woman is pornographic. Let me ask you a question. Do you beat your wife or girlfriend with a studded club or with a broad stick?


>> ^NinjaInHeat:

Ech, I knew she was too good to be true.
What's up with all these self righteous videos lately? Think for a second before you make them, who the fuck are you preaching to? your majority of viewers who are atheist and who understand just as well as you do how ridiculous religions are? or the occasional religious man who believes in that ridiculous shit and doesn't need to hear you point out how illogical it is.
Bitch, if you had half the brains you seem to think you do you'd stop prancing around being all sexy and "hey, look at me, I don't believe in shit, how cool am I?" and start giving some actual opinions, some relevant commentary. When you spend five minutes preaching to a web cam on how stupid Islam is you're showing you're not capable of anything more than your version of flag burning, how stupid a religion is has no relevance on life and laws in a pluralist society and making fun of something doesn't show you have intelligence (Wit may, but you seem to lack in that department).
Anyways, don't mind me, your videos are perfectly acceptable as they are, just as long as you realize they are no more than porn for slightly educated masses (maybe not even slightly educated, just atheist...)

>> ^ponceleon:
I'm sorry, I must have missed something, what does the year have anything to do with any of my points? We have rather modern security cameras where I work and due to the volume of video they have to take, the quality is low and there is no sound (or perhaps it is because of the legal implications as someone else pointed out). Yes, there is a lot of fancy video surveillance equipment out there, but given that this was a bike rack at some no-name university, you really believe they are going to use night-vision, high-def, 30fps 24/7 video to secure that?
>> ^BoneRemake:
its 2010



Just saying, but modern HD security cams use video-motion-detection to start and stop recording. The same tech used in that web cam "game" where you can hit an on-screen beach ball. If it doesn't see movement, it records nothing. There was a sift in the last year of a guy driving his Town Car through a government office. Those cameras were like that, the system only recorded when the car or people were on-screen.

Ech, I knew she was too good to be true.
What's up with all these self righteous videos lately? Think for a second before you make them, who the fuck are you preaching to? your majority of viewers who are atheist and who understand just as well as you do how ridiculous religions are? or the occasional religious man who believes in that ridiculous shit and doesn't need to hear you point out how illogical it is.

Bitch, if you had half the brains you seem to think you do you'd stop prancing around being all sexy and "hey, look at me, I don't believe in shit, how cool am I?" and start giving some actual opinions, some relevant commentary. When you spend five minutes preaching to a web cam on how stupid Islam is you're showing you're not capable of anything more than your version of flag burning, how stupid a religion is has no relevance on life and laws in a pluralist society and making fun of something doesn't show you have intelligence (Wit may, but you seem to lack in that department).

Anyways, don't mind me, your videos are perfectly acceptable as they are, just as long as you realize they are no more than porn for slightly educated masses (maybe not even slightly educated, just atheist...)

Too perfectly setup to not be a fake. Plus who records their web cam chats?

It's an interesting situation, but we've had web-cam streams sifted before. So I think this is alright. As long as we agree that this does not pre-dupe anyone trying to sift individual mst3k stuff, I think we should go ahead and * return it.

I don't think we'll have many sifts like this one, so I propose a live and let live approach to it.

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

It's not "Improv on Chatroulette" but, nice job... for a lefty.


The web cam is actually mirrored. I had forgotten to switch it back.