Every time something like this happens, (suspended YT accounts) people cry about censorship and YT being cowards etc etc. I think its much more likely this is simply a bunch of religious wackos flagging videos and bitching to YT, and of course YT doesnt have time to go through all the videos and shit like that, so they just close the account, its probably even an automated process. ie: "if account X has Y number of flags, close account."

This vid is more an indictment of crappy local news shows than crazy christians. We all know that fundamentalist wackos are going to see "visions and miracles" everywhere. Whats grotesque is that these "journalists" are happy to pad their programs with 5 minutes of ridiculous fluff.

And finally, That squirrel can waterski.

Stay classy San Diego!

Alex Jones is quite the wacko, but this was amazing, I'm still laughing out loud!

Wow. The people who wrote the above comments are wacko's

Great video. Inspiring.

^agreed, but I find it disturbing that CNN and FOX (well maybe not FOX) put these wacko's on the air.

Thanks for the promote!

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
*promote

The culture of police support has been known since the first sheriff's were sworn in.

They are not held to the same standard as all other citizens. They should be. Because they are lawmen, they should suffer the full extent of the law.

Had they sent a cruiser over to the girls house it would have been a different story.

Instead they went all wacko on them. This happened in Texas, they are lucky the father, or mother didn't come out with a Semi Auto and wipe every one in the van out. I do not mean that as a joke, although it does sound like a joke.

>> ^NordlichReiter:
promote
The culture of police support has been known since the first sheriff's were sworn in.
They are not held to the same standard as all other citizens. They should be. Because they are lawmen, they should suffer the full extent of the law.
Had they sent a cruiser over to the girls house it would have been a different story.
Instead they went all wacko on them. This happened in Texas, they are lucky the father, or mother didn't come out with a Semi Auto and wipe every one in the van out. I do not mean that as a joke, although it does sound like a joke.



It's funny because, from her perspective, they would have had every right to do it as well. Well not so much funny, as horrible.

*promote

The culture of police support has been known since the first sheriff's were sworn in.

They are not held to the same standard as all other citizens. They should be. Because they are lawmen, they should suffer the full extent of the law.

Had they sent a cruiser over to the girls house it would have been a different story.

Instead they went all wacko on them. This happened in Texas, they are lucky the father, or mother didn't come out with a Semi Auto and wipe every one in the van out. I do not mean that as a joke, although it does sound like a joke.

>> ^MarineGunrock:
It's not a joke when you yell at a woman who's just trying to earn her pay.


I hear that "he/she is just trying to do his/her job to earn his/her pay, HAVE SOME RESPECT" crap way too often to "protect" people from the most innocent and playful things, and it's custom-designed to make people look like monsters.

Come on man, what a shitty comment. Have a go at him for swearing in a family restaurant, fine, that's the only bad thing he did. She's not made of glass ffs.

I mean he didn't really shout at her and she was laughing and/or playing along at first, she could see a joke coming. Let's face it, if you've ever worked at a restaurant, you'd be dining on that story for years to come in the boring hours when you're stood near the bar waiting for customers to come in trying to chat up the new young bartender, or he trying to chat you up.

"Hey remember that weirdo who came in here and thought it was australia? I served him! Omg i nearly died, it was crazy, i knew something was happening from the start but i didn't realise he'd be such a wacko!"

Come on, really, do we have to make a suffragette out of her?

>> ^qualm:
You really expect for Rong Paul to just come out and admit that he lied? I know you're not serious.
Sure it would make sense at the time. Ron Paul was on the wacko fringes back then too. The Ron Paul Report (and other incarnations) pandered to a certain loathsome fringe demographic that exists in your country. These types have always been drawn to, not repulsed by, racist rhetoric.


I'm glad you speak with such blanketed conviction about these fringe groups, which shows more of a agenda riddled bias than a fresh critical perspective. Still, I'm not sure we're on the same page here. You still haven't answered my questions above, except to say you think the reason why Ron Paul would be blatantly racist in the 90s and not so today is because he was on the wacko fringes back then, too? I'm completely lost. You say "too", so I suppose you mean he's still on the wacko fringe today, so that would prove my point above that he would also be racist today (part of that wacko fringe agenda, you know?) and therefore be willfully writing racist articles. But he's not.

To the contrary, he's writing against racism citing it as a problem of the heart. In his book (Revolution: The Manifesto) he writes a great deal against racism and points out the evils of government sponsored racism, such as why we have a ban against drugs like marijuana (which was motivated against Blacks, Mexicans and Jews). But, no, you claim he's putting all of this effort (even adding it into his book) because he's afraid to admit that he lied. I'm not sure your Daily Kos logic will work on me.

You really expect for Rong Paul to just come out and admit that he lied? I know you're not serious.

Sure it would make sense at the time. Ron Paul was on the wacko fringes back then too. The Ron Paul Report (and other incarnations) pandered to a certain loathsome fringe demographic that exists in your country. These types have always been drawn to, not repulsed by, racist rhetoric.

John Birch Society wacko.

Ooops.. i meant to downvote this moronic, totally incorrect and idiotic statement by Throbbin. Militias comprise Americans of all walks of life, race, religion, creed. It's in our constitution that we have the right to form organized militias to help keep the government in check. If the constitution is suspended for reasons of "continuity of government" then a real danger exists where the constitution may never be un-suspended. Throbbin, your comment is unfounded and incorrect.

>> ^Throbbin:
What a bunch of angry right-wing wacko nutjobs.
FREEDOM?!?!?
Since when does stockpiling weapons make you free?
Since when does dressing in combat fatigues make you free?
The "Michigan Militia Core" and groups like it are crazy right-wing wackos - there's no 2 ways about it. Always looking to be angry at something. Always wanting to be a victim.
Thank goodness the inbreeding will get 'em in the end.

What a bunch of angry right-wing wacko nutjobs.

FREEDOM?!?!?

Since when does stockpiling weapons make you free?

Since when does dressing in combat fatigues make you free?

The "Michigan Militia Core" and groups like it are crazy right-wing wackos - there's no 2 ways about it. Always looking to be angry at something. Always wanting to be a victim.

Thank goodness the inbreeding will get 'em in the end.

Joedirt, I think perhaps you need to step back and look at how nutty/angry/wacko you are coming off in these three sift talk posts. But then again, you come off that way pretty much all the time, hence the "get a girlfriend" remark.

I mean, I pretty much agree with you that "upvote everything" is a silly idea, but when you come off so abrasive, even those who would otherwise be in your corner will have a hard time siding with you.