>> ^peggedbea:
THIS IS NOT PORN. THIS IS A PARODY VIDEO OF OLD LADIES FROM A REPRESSIVE GENERATION LIBERATING THEMSELVES IN THE MOST RIDICULOUS FASHION. AND FUCKING GOOD FOR THEM.
BRAINS APPOLOGY POST SAID IT BEST
titty babies are traumatized by vaginas that are not attached to porn stars.
the polling system is built into the site. and don't even get me started on the number of videos that got mass amounts of votes for being sexy. even if the content itself wasnt intended to strictly titillate, the reason these videos made it to the top was the male sift brain sexualizing it. there is even a video clip from an actual soft core porn vid, allowed to stay without the fuss.
and the talk of bannings, RIDICULOUS.


Soft core is just that - soft core. It shows basically nothing but the odd breast and nothing truly graphic.

This, is not soft core. Videosift doesn't have a "You must be 18 to enter this site" page, this video embed doesn't have a "You must be 18 to view this content" link, however, if you follow the embed you have to click a "I agree that I'm 18 years old" button.

Soft core is displayed on basic cable now. This is not. This is fully graphic material, and other then a small tag of "NSFW" along the side, has nothing to even show what the content is. Right now, I believe the sift is liable if some mother gets pissed off that her kid found something of this quality on here. If there was the "I agree to be 18" button, or the video required you to input age, that would be a horse of a different colour, because that means that the child willingly knew what he was going to be seeing, and the sift has no blame.

It only takes one angry mother to lead a vendetta against something because her child is more special then the others and therefore has to be protected.

That being said, if theres an "I agree that I'm over 18" button on the front page before you can enter the site, who knows how much traffic that'll stop. I came here when I was 17, and granted, would've clicked the button anyway, but there's a lot of goody-two-shoes out there.

Maybe even if there's a system in place that makes it so you have to hit one of the "I'm over 18" buttons to view anything flagged as NSFW, or have to be logged in and have an input age when you sign up. But as it stands right now, this is not educational, this is not art. This is a bunch of women sitting around for one common goal. You want to see something of this sort? Go to a free porn site then. The sift is not one. And again, softcore clips are not as bad, they're on basic cable now. But they're still up to dags discretion.

Thank you sir, the sentiment is appreciated. I'm also Rorschach in the Watchmen, the V in for Vendetta, and Jules motherfucking Winnfield from Pulp Fiction!

...and about 6 Tim Roth characters!

In reply to this comment by enoch:
thinking of you sweetie!
http://www.videosift.com/video/THE-LIBERTINE-opening-scene-with-Johnny-Depp

Why the vendetta? frightened maybe hmmmmmmmmmmmm

>> ^Skeeve:
He deserted the army and has helped others go AWOL and calls for more soldiers to resist. As a soldier myself I find this attitude disgusting. America has an all-volunteer army. No one forced him to join. You can't become a pacifist or a conscientious objector after actively seeking a job in which you might have to kill people.

Except he's not complaining that he had to fight; he's complaining that he had to murder. If I was a soldier and I was sent off to fight a war instigated against people who posed no threat to my country, I'd be pretty pissed off. The army is supposed to protect our country; it's not to be used as the President's personal vendetta team.

>> ^Januari:
I really had to stop watching when he started to suggest his loss was greater than those who lost family in 9/11... This was after of course, he claimed to not care about 9/11 but was also the reason he wanted to go to war and find the people responsible... wha?...

He said he didn't care about 9/11 when it happened because it didn't effect him. He was occupied with his own personal struggles. He's pointing out his tunnel-vision.

"I joined in '03 because I was broke." How do you interpret that as him wanting to find the people responsible?

Thanks for the quality

In reply to this comment by radx:
*Quality clip, all around outstanding performance by Mr. Weaving.

Pie, spanking, requires a nut shot for revenge?

Also I have to say that he puts himself in the fireplace and leaves his legs open, a prime target for a nut shot.

Never ever turn your back on a person with a camera, and a vendetta. Then again, I am not a fan of turning my back on any one from the human race. What, with all the videos I've seen of this type of stuff.

<sarcasm>
It'll also be funny when she finds out his balls are all fucked up and he destroys her, and all she loves in reprisal.
</sarcasm>

Edit: I watched the original video. This is a cycle of viciousness that will only lead to more stupidity.

The record for longest human lifespan is currently held by Jeanne Calment, who lived to 122. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_Calment

She did that with 20th century technology, and she wasn't even an intellectual or highly motivated.

We've already entered the age of organ regeneration... growing new organs from our own cell... and it's already saving lives. I think it will pass regulatory hurdles and come in to widespread usage within 10 or 20 years.

Genome sequencing is down from $250k a year ago to $5k now (http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/006527.html). In 10 or 20 years most people will have their genomes sequenced, and medicine will no longer be a crap shoot.

Experts say that most drugs, whatever the disease, work for only about half the people who take them. Not only is much of the nation’s approximately $300 billion annual drug spending wasted, but countless patients are being exposed unnecessarily to side effects.

[Conventional] studies tend to be “one size fits all,” with the winning treatment recommended for everybody. Personalized medicine would go beyond that by determining which drug is best for which patient, rather than continuing to treat everyone the same in hopes of benefiting the fortunate few. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/30/business/30gene.html?ex=1388379600&en=a3e1de30bab852a6&ei=5124&partner=facebook&exprod=facebook

If you die in 2050, that sounds like a waste, because I think it's highly unlikely I won't live into the 2100s. Imagine where technology will be in 2100.

------------------------------
Re: 'world of criminals'

I think the idea of humans as possessing 'personhood' is a simplistic model. The deeper you dig in the cognitive sciences and the human sciences in general, the more clear it becomes that human thought outputs and behavioral outputs are just the result of deterministic mechanisms. Looking at humans as 'persons' isn't looking at a deep enough level of detail... and it makes us take things 'personally' -- as if the decision agents (in a game theory sense) we're interacting with are 'persons.' Humans want to be good... they just have simplistic, unmotivated brains.

Change the inputs, and the outputs will change. Embryo selection is borderline-practical today, and it's increasingly being used. My prediction is by 2030 5% of births (in wealthy countries) will be using it (for cosmetic and temperament improvements - e.g. reduced addictive behavior, greater motivation, less 'social learners' and more 'infovores'), and by 2060 60% of births will be using it. When those generations reach 25 years old, they'll be starting to influence society, which will be 2055 and 2085, respectively.

However, by 2055, I think we'll have neurotechnology that achieves most of the large goals of neurogenetic change: next-generation neuropharmaceuticals, neuroimplants, and changes to the organization of our neural tissue using stem cells.

I believe the future is humanistic and humanitarian. And the world is incompetent, waiting for us to influence the arc of history.

IMHO, anyway.

What do you think?


------------------------------

In reply to this comment by gorillaman:
I think we're going to miss SENS by at least a generation. The way I treat my body I'm expecting to die around 40.

Doesn't it gnaw at you that, living in a world mostly populated by criminals, any good you do will primarily benefit them?

In reply to this comment by chilaxe:
Gorillaman, we're young enough that we have a decent chance of living to see the fulfillment of SENS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey).

Doesn't that make you want to do something with your life that's ingenious and constructive, helping out the common good, instead of just pursuing vendettas?

I think we're going to miss SENS by at least a generation. The way I treat my body I'm expecting to die around 40.

Doesn't it gnaw at you that, living in a world mostly populated by criminals, any good you do will primarily benefit them?

In reply to this comment by chilaxe:
Gorillaman, we're young enough that we have a decent chance of living to see the fulfillment of SENS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey).

Doesn't that make you want to do something with your life that's ingenious and constructive, helping out the common good, instead of just pursuing vendettas?

Gorillaman, we're young enough that we have a decent chance of living to see the fulfillment of SENS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey).

Doesn't that make you want to do something with your life that's ingenious and constructive, helping out the common good, instead of just pursuing vendettas?

In reply to this comment by gorillaman:
Fucking apology from the fucking prime minister. Unbelievable.

It was only in '67 homosexuality was somewhat decriminalised in the UK. Not actually that long ago. You know what that means? It's not too late for justice. Many of the advocates and enforcers of the corrupt law, corrupt government, corrupt society of the period are still breathing; yet to evade their deserved punishment by dying of natural causes.

Drag them out of their retirement homes, torture them to death and parade their corpses through the streets. I am not kidding.

>> ^rougy:
Though I don't like what happened, she really should have shut her mouth and stayed in her car.


Rougy, I voted you down for "she really should have shut her mouth", and that led to the following post below. However I do agree that she should have stayed in the car.

When I get pulled over I only roll the window down half way, and keep my doors locked.


<font size = 1>V for Vendetta - People Should Not Be Afraid of Their Government - The funniest movie is here. Find it

Aside from the exploding parliament, "People should not be afraid of their government, the government should be afraid of its people."

There is a difference between a criminal and a moving violation. IF you cant handle an angry citizen peacefully then you shouldn't be a Peace Officer. The officers actions were cowardly, and he should be stripped of his authority.

Every day citizens should not have to worry about getting electrocuted like this, and they shouldn't be afraid to question "the man".

Your video, V for Vendetta - Prothero's Speech, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Bill o reilly, glen beck, BBFOX, vendetta, evil' to 'Bill o reilly, glenn beck, BBFOX, vendetta, evil' - edited by demon_ix

god, this guy is reminding me more and more of Prothero from V for Vendetta each day.

Go Dutch dude!!! Confuse Bill-O with facts!

zombieater: Yes, there's a difference. The channel in Vendetta is getting it's news from the government directly. So what you're thinking of is Fox News two years ago

Is there really any difference now between FOX news today and the news channel in V for Vendetta? That movie was set years in the future but I think that "future" has already come.

What happened to that news host again? hmmm...