Ok Bob. I explained summary judgement and prima facie cases in small easy to understand words.
You still post this unmitigated stupidity as if you don’t understand.
Are you honestly so dumb, so incapable of learning the simplest of legal doctrines, that when undisputed evidence proves the case during discovery no trial is needed.
The business records from the Trump organization are incontrovertible, for taxes he listed one value, for collateral he listed another value that was 3-10000 times the assessed value.
Maralago is the prime example, because he went to court disputing the $18 million evaluation for taxes AS TOO HIGH! Now he claims he was committing massive tax fraud because it’s really worth $1.8 BILLION. That is known as banking fraud, tax fraud, wire fraud, and business fraud. He cannot dispute those facts, so he was found guilty before a trial started, as usual in the American justice system.
Also, in a civil trial you only need to prove it’s more likely than not, not prove beyond doubt the accusations are true…but they have proven beyond any doubt that the accusations are true in discovery…when the admissibility of evidence is argued BEFORE a trial starts.
Just like Giuliani who didn’t dispute the slander before trial so was found guilty without trial, he couldn’t dispute the evidence without committing perjury so he didn’t take the stand to defend himself at all…just what he said guilty people do. 😂

Either you know this and are just lying like an idiot because you are frustrated at being such a constant loser or you are actually just too stupid to understand that when you’re caught red handed with your hand in the cookie jar and your dick in the little boy, you’re caught and you’re guilty.

You just love to look like a braying moron, don’t you? Congratulations traitor, you do.

You do know atheism is a world view, don't you? Hitchens couldn't provide any reasons for his view..yes he definitely hates the judeo-christian god, that's clear..but this is a philosophical argument..and Hitchens failed on every point to provide any compelling reasons for his views. I've always been of the mind that two reasonable people can come to a reasonable agreement based on the facts. And I think William Craig was reasonable here..he gave hitchens every opportunity to refute his arguments, which he failed to do.


>> ^Mazex:
I hate this whole, WHICH ARE YOU, WE NEED TO GIVE YOU A LABEL so we can further compartmentalize society for our untrained brains to understand.
Also I find nearly all differences in opinions have a certain aspect of each person having a different way of defining and understanding words, and each person having a different set of beliefs about different labels that they place on people.
So ultimately neither side will give in unless they redefine what information they use in their minds. And that requires either brainwashing at a young age before the brain's structure is further cemented, or a very clear piece of logical evidence to prove a point to someone intelligent or someone who is in a state of weakness in their mind who is likely to grasp onto anything that gives them hope.
Religion obviously has no evidence so the people already brainwashed by religion know they have to brainwash kids, or prey on weak minded adults who are in trouble, such as people who face death/pain/other extreme difficulties etc.

I hate this whole, WHICH ARE YOU, WE NEED TO GIVE YOU A LABEL so we can further compartmentalize society for our untrained brains to understand.

Also I find nearly all differences in opinions have a certain aspect of each person having a different way of defining and understanding words, and each person having a different set of beliefs about different labels that they place on people.

So ultimately neither side will give in unless they redefine what information they use in their minds. And that requires either brainwashing at a young age before the brain's structure is further cemented, or a very clear piece of logical evidence to prove a point to someone intelligent or someone who is in a state of weakness in their mind who is likely to grasp onto anything that gives them hope.

Religion obviously has no evidence so the people already brainwashed by religion know they have to brainwash kids, or prey on weak minded adults who are in trouble, such as people who face death/pain/other extreme difficulties etc.

Could not understand word this nigga was saying YO

>> ^ToKeyMonsTeR:

So how do you go about stopping things like this? Whenever I speak up about these types of things people just blow me off as missinformed or unamerican or some crap


You show them videos like this, show them the hard hitting gore. That's the only way to do it. No one understands words anymore, you have to show them the raw, gristly, crimson spray.

He is a very good speaker... though some US citizens have difficulty understanding words with more than two syllables... or someone who speaks in 'that dern funny accent'.

Uhh, yes. It's one of the rules of becoming a citizen.

"Language
Applicants for naturalization must be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language"

From: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=12e596981298d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD