>> ^chilaxe:

Doctors see death all the time. Why hide death away and put superstitions around it?


Because the majority of people are cat video loving, do not like to understand the meat they eat comes from cows, pussy mother fuckers.

*cough*

*cough*

As in, should this be on the sift at all since some people are apparently getting entertainment value out of watching the death of others. I'm sorry for both you and the rest of us that you don't seem to understand that. >> ^BoneRemake:

Snuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuffSnuff snuff snuff

Please shut your fingers up with your jack ass snuff calling, I have written the word enough your personal need to say it should fade.

I think if it was "different" in that it added more value to the original post, it would be ok. This one seems to be the same vid, just one is a cam from the same source. In my mind, that's a dupe.

Now this is just my understanding of the system so I may be wrong. The whole idea of what is or is not a dupe is always a hot topic on the Sift.

In reply to this comment by Boise_Lib:
In reply to this comment by critical_d:
This appears to be a cam version of http://videosift.com/video/Indiana-State-Fair-stage-collapses
-during-storm-4-dead


I wondered about that. So, a different version Isn't a dupe?

This appears to be a cam version of http://videosift.com/video/Indiana-State-Fair-stage-collapses-during-storm-4-dead

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Indiana-State-Fair-stage-collapses-during-storm-4-dead

I asked here:
http://videosift.com/video/Indiana-State-Fair-stage-collapses-during-storm-4-dead
whether this is a dupe. Crickets.

Any thoughts?

Would this be considered a dupe?
http://videosift.com/video/Main-Stage-collapses-at-Indiana-State-Fair

It's the same thing, but from a different source.

i will never enjoy a state fair in the same way ever again.

>> ^DarkMatter:

>> ^ForgedReality:
Is Al still around?

Yeah, he just played the MN State Fair last week. Wife wouldn't go with me though.


Time for a divorce. >:[

>> ^ForgedReality:

Is Al still around?


Yeah, he just played the MN State Fair last week. Wife wouldn't go with me though.

>> ^Tymbrwulf:
I don't know enough about law to make an informed decision on this one. But I did get this from the alaskan state fair website:
Press Release:
Regarding the incident on the Alaska State Fair Fairgrounds 26 August 2010
Friday, August 27, 2010 at 9:50pm
Our concern is first and foremost the safety of our fairgoers, the families with their children who should be able to enjoy the fair without disturbance or potential danger.
We are in touch with the company with whom we have a contract for fair security to review what transpired. We are also in touch with the Palmer Police on this matter.
Because the fairgrounds is on private property, we reserve the right to remove someone from the premises who is creating a disruption or may pose a threat to the safety of others.
We welcome diverse viewpoints and have a structure in place at the Alaska State Fair that allows for peaceful discord and exchange at our vendor and organization booth area.


I am going to speak about the commentor here, not you Tym. I am really annoyed with lame-o's like this punk.

Why do people state irrelavent information? They say it to stir up silly bullshit. "We reserve the right to remove someone from the premises who is creating a disruption..." Good, they can stop right there. Everything else is propaganda lame-o shit. "or may pose a threat to the safety of others." You think so? Is that just because you own the property? I thought, dickmunch, that "danger" would be for the public too...but by your statement, you imply anyone can be dangerous anywhere that is not private property...

The protestor was little danger, and the guy or girl issuing the statement needs to stop adding bullshit and stfu.

I don't know enough about law to make an informed decision on this one. But I did get this from the alaskan state fair website:

Press Release:
Regarding the incident on the Alaska State Fair Fairgrounds 26 August 2010
Friday, August 27, 2010 at 9:50pm

Our concern is first and foremost the safety of our fairgoers, the families with their children who should be able to enjoy the fair without disturbance or potential danger.

We are in touch with the company with whom we have a contract for fair security to review what transpired. We are also in touch with the Palmer Police on this matter.

Because the fairgrounds is on private property, we reserve the right to remove someone from the premises who is creating a disruption or may pose a threat to the safety of others.

We welcome diverse viewpoints and have a structure in place at the Alaska State Fair that allows for peaceful discord and exchange at our vendor and organization booth area.

>> ^marinara:


people hate larouche because he makes sense. 100 times more sense than the mainstream narrative.


lol. Yeah, he seems like such a level-headed guy.

This protester was hog tackled (quite literally) because he was disturbing the peace. If he hadn't started screaming shit he probably would have been fine. Some rent-a-cops tackling a silent, peaceful demonstrator would have been much more interesting.

Is this state fair funded and operated by the state or private individuals? It matters.

If this was a private event, then he was trespassing when they asked him to leave and he cited his right to free speech. If this was a public event (meaning it's funded and operated by the state or city using tax revenue), then he has a right to be there and protest as long as he's not violent or causing an unreasonable disturbance. Right?

>> ^deathcow:

Personally, I think this guy can promote whatever he wants to. Just keep it out of my state fair!!! I'm there for fun. Thanks to this looney a bunch of kids get to see a protester taken down at a fun event. Think ahead. Choose the correct platform.


Dunno, doesn't the fact that anyone is welcome to a state fair mean that anyone's crazy ideas are as well? Having people wondering around practicing free speech in a way that is annoying shouldn't have an impact on his ability to practice it. Freedom causes a lot of unpleasantness, like people cursing in front of your kids or something, but we have to put up with those small inconveniences in the name of a greater virtue than comfort.

It was hard for me to understand, were those policemen or just security guards. Why was he touched, was he under arrest?