Still dealing with fallout from Elevatorgate? When will it end? Why can't the community let it go and move to more meaningful conversation? I mean I stood by Rebecca at the start, and still say the dude was highly improper, but for that incident to continue to divide the community is just beyond idiotic. Somebody overreacted to Rebecca's statements and she overreacted back, and from there it snowballed on and on... and on... Seems both sides are carrying it on and on rather than just agreeing to disagree over the issue and moving on to more important issues.

I smell a fake. Those snowballs didn't dramatically increase in size as they rolled down that hill..

*promote on 11/16/2012, the day unions forced Hostess out of business. 18,700 jobs ELIMINATED!

NO
MORE
TWINKIES
------------------------------------------------------------------

NO MORE
DING-DONGS

__________________________________________________________________

No mas Snowballs

Their fruit pies sucked, good riddance to those.....

" "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal." -- Da rules.

We're not prudes here, so 4 of those don't count of lack of proper nudity, and Girl in a Toyota is funny and has a story. Britta crosses the line and should also be * discussed. If it had been discussed and approved already, you'd have a point.>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^messenger:
Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.
They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.
On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-To
yota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goe
s-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents
-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-H
er-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-B
ETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows
I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.
I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

>> ^messenger:

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.

On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-Toyota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goes-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-Her-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-BETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows

I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.

I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?

And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

*controversy>> ^xxovercastxx:

@messenger
http://videosift.com/video/Skittles-Taste-the-Rainbow
http://videosift.com/video/BANNED-GERMAN-SPRITE-AD-BJ
http://videosift.com/video/Mr-Tree-This-gets-a-10-on-the-weird-O-meter
I think there's precedent for this sort of thing.

This dude better watch out--he may be getting a snowball in the future.

Great song..I happen to NOT be gay. Buy Morten Harket would be cool bald or with hair to his knees. Excellent album. I would put up Cold As Stone if I thought it had a snowballs chance in hell of sifting..

no love for snowball 2

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

Great name for a piglet.


Snowball was taken.

>> ^notarobot:

I'm looking forward to eleven more months of Romney videos.


Hell, you'll also be seeing this one over and over again 11 for months too.

It'll just snowball out from here into long montages.

Corporations are people my friend, I like firing people, I bet you $10,000 bucks...

Golden oldies will return! Who let the dogs out!

I think it's clear that Ron Paul has a snowball's chance of winning the nomination let alone the general election.

nope. those are real. all six of them.>> ^Stormsinger:

Styrofoam snowballs, silicone breasts...at least it's consistent.

Styrofoam snowballs, silicone breasts...at least it's consistent.