A silly girl gets bopped on the head by a picture in a comical slapstick moment, and it leads to a discussion about religion. Not ok, team.

I'm a Stooge fan. I own the chronologically released shorts on DVD and I've seen all thier shorts at least 3 or 4 times.

As far as the trailer goes, the Stooges themselves look and sound great. They really seem to have nailed the Stooges' mannerisms, voices, and style. The guy doing Larry Fine is a little taller and thinner than he should be, but for the most part in every other way they are a faithful re-creation of the classic characters. They nailed it. And what slapstick I saw sure looked like it had the punchy, zippy choreography that made the stooges so great when they were on thier game. Kudos.

I'm a bit nervous when I see nuns in slingshot thongs though, and women walking around with 6 inches of cleavage. The Stooges were certainly no strangers to spicing things up a bit and playing the wolf-hounds. But they kept the innuendo pretty subtle, and the pool nun was about as subtle as a crowbar. I liked how they kept Curly innocent though. "Is your hair different?". I sure hope they keep the boys innocent. I'd hate to see the movie become nothing but a scatological, sex humor cesspool. The Stooges should not go there. That's no thier thing. But it IS a Farrel movie, so (sadly) such pandering seems likely.

I'm not keen on slapstick, but it can be really funny when it's done right. I Hope it works for them.

I wanted not to like it, but I couldn't help myself. I love slapstick!

What? They meant to do that. That was a classic Russian gymnast slapstick routine.

Bottom was so great back in the day, slapstick on crack

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Jeez I love cats. They provide so much unintentional joy. They're funny because they take themselves so seriously, and when something funny happens their seriousness makes it that much funnier. They're the slapstick masters of the animal kingdom.

Dogs are less funny because they goofily know they are funny. No one likes a clown who laughs at himself.

Maybe this guy signed away his rights to the video, and this fine, discrete dating service thought it was too funny not to share with the world. Too bad we can't see Janice's tape to confirm that they were made for each other. I'm going to assume his limited repertoire of slapstick antics really did make her laugh, and she used to brag to her constantly pregnant sister about him.

Also ya gotta love that she took the truck and the house with her.

I thought Indy 4 was almost there....
a) The two best Indy movies (1 & 3) had their roots in Biblical myths, this made them feel sort of 'legit', a nice sort of 'what if' these stories were true. Temple of Doom lacked this with him not searching for anything really, just stumbling across the Thuggees. The crystal skulls could have been a pretty good myth to work with, but there wasn't enough decoding scripture or writings or anything really to _do_ with the myth... I think that's where the two weak films initially fail, they aren't a good 'search for a lost item' story.

b) Far too much CGI, the chase through the jungle, while having some nice action and set pieces, just feels like a cgi scene, doesn't feel based in reality.

c) Too much lame humour. It's where Lucas failed a lot with the Star Wars prequels too... resorting to fart jokes and bad slapstick when the originals had a semblance of subtlety to them.

d) The end... just... a spaceship... really? The first one, we have ghosts... that's good, honest, old school movies. The second has some heart ripping and glowing stones, the third has life giving/sapping cups... but none of them have alien creatures coming to life and a space ship taking off... just doesn't work. That really should have been played down a lot, lot more. Some sort of alien power source that activated and made a whole lot of ancient machinery come to life would have been more in keeping.

I really enjoyed the motorcycle chase, I like Shia, I think he does well with whatever he's given. I think Harrison is still excellent in the role, there were some great action pieces. It's just really annoying to see a film get so close... so close and miss out due to what feels like just not having one more person look over the script and say 'Hey guys... you're kinda missing a few key "Indy" things here... and a few of these scenes are really very hokey'

But yeah, not as bad as some would make it out to be.

That is absolutely a slapstick fall. What a mean f-ing trick too if it had been real. Dude could've cracked his skull.

Or how to turn on your inner slapstick mutie!

enjoying stupid humor (which im sure we can all agree it is) does not make one stupid. I think that is the underlying issue here, at least the one i have a problem with. if slapstick, stupid humor, or whatever the hell else you wanna call this is not your cup of tea, no worries; different strokes for different folks. but when you want to point out all the persons who upvoted for the misogynistic, dumb fuck, witless, woman haters we so obviously are, then i think its time to climb down from that pedestal before you break your neck from turning your nose up so sharply

furthermore, in what ways is this video different from http://videosift.com/video/Kicked-In-The-Nuts-World-Record (particularly as it pertains to VS devolving into YT)? oh this one has a woman instead of a man, how silly of me (thats that super witty sarcasm at work there).
consider the following:
http://videosift.com/video/If-this-isnt-eia-NOTHING-IS
http://videosift.com/video/The-very-definition-of-Evolution-in-Action-20-seconds
http://videosift.com/video/An-EPIC-Nut-Shot
http://videosift.com/video/Slide-Divider-Vs-Nuts
http://videosift.com/video/Nut-Shot-World-Champion-Not-Removed-From-Gene-Pool
so on and so forth.

additionally, http://videosift.com/video/Topless-Chair-Jousting-New-Olympic-Sport-for-2012 is linked below in the related videos. ya its only got four votes (im a sucker for boobies so i upvoted, sue me for being a guy) and theres no controversy voiced in the comments to speak of.........what, really, is the damn difference?

my point being, if this humor suits you, upvote, if it doesnt, dont vote or downvote even, but can we please stop with the inquisition of gwizz and how much of a woman hater he is, and how derp he is for posting this, and how much of a saboteur he is, and how he wants VS to become stupid YT, pretty pretty please?

slapstick and the internet do not bode well.

Yeah this wasn't remotely funny, seemed like they were trying too hard. The title is misleading too, none of them are really positions to have sex in, they are sexual situation parodies. Also surely they know at least 1 girl who could of featured in it....

>> ^nanrod:

Seriously, you're being too kind.>> ^rottenseed:
It's pretty easy to get me to laugh...slapstick, sarcasm, dry British humor, somebody in family diagnosed with cancer, child getting hit by truck—the list goes on. But somehow, this managed to run for almost 2 and a half minutes without inducing so much as a chuckle.

Seriously, you're being too kind.>> ^rottenseed:

It's pretty easy to get me to laugh...slapstick, sarcasm, dry British humor, somebody in family diagnosed with cancer, child getting hit by truck—the list goes on. But somehow, this managed to run for almost 2 and a half minutes without inducing so much as a chuckle.