search results matching tag: rove
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (109) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (4) | Comments (305) |
Videos (109) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (4) | Comments (305) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Maddow: Time for the right to leave the bubble
"Karl Rove said we should..."
Tools.
Avalanche on Bullshit Mountain - TDS
Tags for this video have been changed from 'daily show, jon, stewart, karl, rove, election, ohio' to 'daily show, jon stewart, karl rove, election, ohio, fox news' - edited by xxovercastxx
Darkhand (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 2 Badge!
Karl Rove on what went wrong for Romney-VOTE SUPPRESSION!!
>> ^DuoJet:
Karl Rove has to answer a lot of pissed off millionaires and billionaires. All that money on all those Republican candidates and nothing to show for it. Will they take him to court? Is he finished in politics? Will they have him suicided?
Door number three.
Karl Rove on what went wrong for Romney-VOTE SUPPRESSION!!
Karl Rove has to answer a lot of pissed off millionaires and billionaires. All that money on all those Republican candidates and nothing to show for it. Will they take him to court? Is he finished in politics? Will they have him suicided?
speechless (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
Karl Rove Calls Fox News Premature
Now living in his 14th minute, Mr. Karl Rove!
Karl Rove Calls Fox News Premature
Karl Rove woke up with a horses head in his bed this morning.
Karl Rove Calls Fox News Premature
1. karl rove is a giant piece of crap.
2. karl looks upset like he can't believe the Dems rigged the system better than he did.
MrFisk (Member Profile)
Your video, Karl Rove Calls Fox News Premature, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 5 Badge!
Romney Loses the 2012 Election: Complete Concession Speech
>> ^lantern53:
why? WHY? wwhyyyyyy? *boooohooohooo*.
To quote Speechless in the Karl Rove thread:
Your tears are sweet delicious nectar.
:-]
Karl Rove Calls Fox News Premature
Rove tears are sweet delicious nectar
mmmmmmmmm so delicious
Karl Rove Calls Fox News Premature
Gee, who does Fox News work for?
Big Papa Rove!
Tea Party is the American Taliban
Sure, the Taliban is a bit of an extreme comparison, so here's one closer to the truth:
Protesting against government's excessive spending (while supporting extended tax cuts for the wealthy and 2 pointless wars) makes you a hypocrite.
Crying about freedom from big government (while working to limit the freedoms of people you don't agree with on a federal level) makes you a hypocrite.
The Tea Party is a bought-and-paid-for astro-turfing campaign to subvert actual conservatism with something else entirely. It's not grass-roots when your "movement" is paid for by the Koch brothers and Karl Rove. It's a farce, a joke.
How'd I do?
Challenges of Getting to Mars
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
Yep, that's what I'm suggesting. Though I guess by the way you've framed your questions you think I'm insane. The success rate of the balloon method is not bad. And getting two rovers down from a single launch is also something that's been successful. I don't think it's that unreasonable to consider that two rovers like Spirit and Opportunity could carry complementary gear, meet up and connect.
You're right that we don't send landers to Mars very often - that's why it's important to build on successful technologies with a proven track record of success to maximise our chances.
Thanks for the link - I've reviewed a lot of this stuff too though I appreciate more information even if it is delivered with a heavy dose of condescension.
Egos and personalities involved in science? Why would I ever think that - everything we do or say or write comes from a completely rational base right?
>> ^Fletch:
@dag
Are humans supposed to bounce across the surface in a balloon when/if we ever send a manned mission? Do you think that success or failure of this landing precludes learning anything from it? We don't get to send landers to Mars very often, so the opportunity for testing new procedures and techniques has to be taken when it can. Every little thing is done for a reason. If you think it's the result of "personalities and nerd egos", there are hundreds of books, TV specials, and documentaries out there that detail just about everything NASA has ever done, from inception to success or failure, as well as the people and personalities involved, that I think will change your mind. Here's a good place to start. Great book.
Assuming you are serious...
The success rate of Mars missions is not good. On top of that are budget and launch window considerations. Are you really suggesting that TWO separate pieces be launched, have them both fly 150 million miles to Mars, enter orbit, BOTH successfully land (and land close enough they can find each other), find each other, and then connect somehow to make one rover just so they can use ballons? Really? Talk about complicated... It would take an incredibly huge nerd ego to even ATTEMPT to sell that idea. Even a single launch with two pieces on board would rely on the success of two completely separate and complicated landings and a meet-up before the rover mission could even begin. This also means the weight of each half of the rover would have to be reduced so two separate landing systems can be included. Less room for instruments. Less science. Anyhoo, this system is not so different from the previous rovers. They weren't just dropped from a parachute. The atmosphere is too thin for a parachute alone. RAD (rocket assisted descent) motors brought the rovers to a near dead stop about 50 feet above the surface and they were released. This landing also calls for more precision, as the landing zone is much more specific.