Nobody said that they were going to arrest anyone for how they vote, they said they would continue to arrest them EVEN IF the law to decriminalize passes.

>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^blankfist:
Where's our fighters for Democratic justice on this topic? @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://netrunner.videosift.com" title="member since August 5th, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">NetRunner, @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/dystopianfuturetoday" title="member since January 9th, 2007" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">dystopianfuturetoday, I'm calling you out.
On what, exactly? The title & intro are outright false -- nobody's threatening to arrest anyone for how they vote.
On legalization of marijuana, I'm in favor, so it can't be that.
I guess it's the usual thing where you think any time a Democratic politician does something other than flout the laws and Constitution in pursuit of some extreme straw-man liberal policy platform you've cooked up, you think you've scored some sort of victory over liberalism generally, and me specifically.
Guess what! I'm pro-Prop 19, but I think the DOJ has no choice but to continue to enforce the Federal laws. The executive shouldn't get to just say "we disagree with the laws, so we're not enforcing them". If the President could do that, what limits are there on his powers, exactly?
I'm thinking if Prop 19 passes, the conflict between Federal and state laws will make legalization into a front-page national debate...and I think that'd be a great thing! I'm hoping at the end of the debate we wind up with the Federal ban on marijuana is lifted.

>> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant, that means blocked but notdead


Whoops. I misread that. Thanks. Hmm, why is it blocked in USA?!?!

>> ^gwiz665:

I saw that and instantly thought of @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://blankfist.videosift.com" title="member since July 4th, 2007" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">blankfist... go figure.
In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
wow
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Did you go swimming again?


I do that "shit" all the time. But with more gravity, girth and gusto.

>> ^Issykitty:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant... Energy @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant!


Darn, you caught me with my first job ever.

>> ^lucky760:

I'm guessing it's @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://dag.videosift.com" title="member since February 16th, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">dag from high school:


This is EXACTLY why posting images would be a great idea in comments. Without that photo your comment would not be as funny IMHO.

>> ^Issykitty:

Just call it the @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant channel.


I like that idea! Can we also change VideoSift to AntSift or VideoAnt too? Also Siftbot to SiftAnt or AntBot? IssyKitty, you can be my co-moderator for it.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant
And I would laugh cause it be hilarious and neat.
..also cause I'd probably make your mother walk in first. oh snap! = P


I don't have a queen.

>> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant & @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/geo321" title="member since December 3rd, 2008" class="profilelink">geo321 rubies and above can embed from anywhere... anywhere as long as its a flash embed. I've embedded redtube before.. but been struck down in sift-court.


Sorry, I meant I didn't know MegaVideo had embedding code to use here.

If you use splicd.com you can specify a start time in your embed, i.e., people won't have to watch the ad at the beginning. Obseruv:

<div style="text-align: right; margin-top: 3px; width: 425px; height: 344px;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://splicd.com" style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 13px; text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,sans-serif;">powered by <span style="color: rgb(200, 91, 0);">Splicd.com</span></div>

True.

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
>> ^bmacs27:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://duckman33.videosift.com" title="member since January 10th, 2008" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(43, 104, 238);">Duckman33 :
The price.


Then I'm all for it!

>> ^bmacs27:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://duckman33.videosift.com" title="member since January 10th, 2008" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(43, 104, 238);">Duckman33 :
The price.


Then I'm all for it!

>> ^gwiz665:

I always enjoyed the counterpoint of the Choral singing and the weapons in the trailer of Homeworld. Love it.
Below is a live version of it
<div id="widget_1727255049"><script src="http://videosift.com/widget.js?video=82474&width=540&comments=0&minimized=1" type="text/javascript"></script><div style="border: 1px solid rgb(31, 146, 199); margin: 0pt; padding: 5px; background: rgb(79, 179, 226) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; display: none; width: 550px; height: 462px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 5px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 5px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 5px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 5px;" id="vsvid_828978685"><embed style="margin: 5px; display: block;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="about:blank" height="432" width="540"><div style="border: 1px solid rgb(31, 146, 199); margin: 5px 5px 0pt 0pt; background: rgb(167, 217, 240) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; float: left; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; font-size: 14px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 4px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 4px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 4px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 4px; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: -1px; font-family: Verdana,Lucida Sans,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" id="vsvote_828978685"><a rel="nofollow" href="#" title="Sift this video up!" style="padding: 3px 5px; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(31, 146, 199); display: table-cell;">▲ 25</div><div style="padding: 3px 5px 0pt 0pt;"><a rel="nofollow" style="text-decoration: none; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: -1px; font-family: Verdana,Lucida Sans,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(215, 237, 248);" title="View Full Video and Comment Listing at VideoSift" target="_blank" href="http://videosift.com/video/Agnus-Dei-From-Samuel-Barbers-Adagio-for-Strings">Agnus Dei - From Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings<a rel="nofollow" style="float: right;" title="Visit VideoSift.com" target="_blank" href="http://videosift.com"> </div><div style="height: 0pt; font-size: 0pt; clear: both;"></div><div style="text-align: right; margin-top: 5px;"><div style="float: left; font-family: tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 11px;">Logged in as <a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" target="_blank" style="border: 0pt none ; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;">ant!</div><a rel="nofollow" style="text-decoration: none; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: -1px; font-family: Verdana,Lucida Sans,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(167, 217, 240);" href="#">close</div><script src="http://videosift.com/widget.js?action=load&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvideosift.com%2Fvideo%2FHomeworld-Main-Theme-music&video=82474" type="text/javascript"></script></div><a rel="nofollow" href="#" style="border: 1px solid rgb(31, 146, 199); margin: 0pt; padding: 5px; background: rgb(79, 179, 226) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; display: table-cell; text-align: center; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 5px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 5px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 5px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 5px;" id="vsthm_828978685"> </div>
quality


Dude, submit that and we'll vote it!

>> ^Issykitty:

Small enough for @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant!

That last post got all fucked up, let's try again.

Indeed. Common sense goes a long way! I have been a computer user since 1995, a support technician since 1999, and I have had a total of 2 viruses on my systems.

I can also say that back when I first worked here (1999) I wouldn't touch the consumer stuff either. It was bloated and basically took over the computer. But as you said, the 2010 products are much, much improved over the older stuff. Things may still get by us but that's rare and mostly due to new variants of old threats or new threats altogether. Other products may catch more threats but they also have a higher false positive rate. Norton products have the lowest false positive rate of any AV software in the market today. The main problem with AV products is they are reactive instead of proactive. Once we can get to a proactive state things will change drastically.

http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5278&review=Symantec+Norton+Antivirus+2010+Review

>> ^Tymbrwulf:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://duckman33.videosift.com" title="member since January 10th, 2008" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(43, 104, 238);">Duckman33: I've been a Norton user until '05, when I switched to ESET. As far as Norton goes, I wouldn't say it sucks, but it does not have a good track record over the past 5 years.
I would argue that your lack of development of FAST AV software is what gave you guys the shit reputation you have today. I heard Norton 2010 isn't as bad as previous versions, but I won't touch it until I read positive reviews citing benchmarks, detection rates, and other things.
I've recently made the switch over from ESET to Panda Cloud due to owning a netbook, and haven't looked back since.
Of course we all know the BEST AV out there: Common Sense™ 2011. Using this you'll avoid 99% of all viruses.


EDIT: /sigh, I give up...

>> ^maatc:

>> ^Zyrxil:
The Youtube version, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voB6WiP83NU has better image quality.

sport
Can you swap in the YT embed @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant?


Done and thanks. Kept the old video link in case YouTube's gets pulled.