search results matching tag: redbull

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (19)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (0)     Comments (38)   

Ferrari F40 + Snow Chains + Snowy Mountain = Win!

oritteropo says...

The behind the scenes movie was just posted to Jalopnik with more details about that $2 million Ferrari (that they broke the suspension and gearbox, and almost crashed into a tree).

http://www.redbull.com/jp/ja/motorsports/stories/1331788598091/f40-behind-the-scene

Payback said:

As Chaosengine said, yes, the F40 does have a wing.

Part of my belief comes from the lights, but mostly it's the ride height. There's enough room under this car for a real F40 to drive under it...

Something yells "FIERO!!" and not "FERRARI!!"

Verstappen's Kitzbühel F1 Race On Snow Covered Ski Slope

Ashenkase says...

"The pinnacle of motor sport met the pinnacle of winter sports" and jumped the shark on Red Bull's retarded string of perceived amazing stunts.

Next up... A trans turtle space fairing balloonist vs. the world championship BLT sandwich making Badminton player in a duel of wits as they race to the top of Olympus Mans on the red planet. The first competitor to the top must chug a jar of pickled mushroom bell bottoms to claim the prize of most inane competition.

Join us on Sunday with Marv Albert in his lingerie to take in this one of a kind Redbull bullshit competition.

Seriously, this is starting to feel like the strange crap Wide World of Sports put out in the 70's.

ADAM FREELAND - WE WANT YOUR SOUL

enoch says...

*promote our species rapid decent into useless irrelevancy,consumermism.you already sold your sold for the shiny.

but don't you fret in your childlike ignorance.just go back to staring at your phone to deflect and distract you from your soulless existence.

here...have a redbull.
have an adderall and a xanx.
oh look! somebody texted you!
see? you are relevant and people really do like you!

just go back to sleep.
everything is OK.

oritteropo (Member Profile)

Vikersund 2015: Peter Prevc breaks world record, flies 250m

Doubt - How Deniers Win

enoch says...

@bobknight33
you are confusing a political argument with a scientific one.

as @bcglorf has pointed out,the science is already In and established.the debate is on the relative parameters i.e: how much/little the affects will manifest.
so while it has been established their IS climate change and man HAS affected that change.the debate is the varying degrees and the level of impact.

so we know there will be a global effect,the debate is HOW and WHEN it will manifest,and on a smaller scale,just how much influence humankind is responsible.

some predict an extinction level catastrophe,while other predictions are not quite as apocalyptic,but the debate on whether or not climate change is real..is over.

because that is a scientific debate.

now in the political arena,whose job is to obfuscate any relevant facts to muddy the argument to propel the interests of extremely monied and powerful interests,they create a faux debate to give the appearance that the debate is still ongoing and the science is not settled.

which is exactly what this video is addressing.
remember,they dont have to win the argument.they just have to make a reasonable sounding argument..even if based on bullshit...to make you think.."well,...maybe" and they GOTCHA!

so you can make this a liberal vs conservative argument if you wish,but i would just point out that you playing the game exactly they way they have set it up.to manipulate you.

as for your assertion of "liberal owned media".
dude...
stop parroting that tired old trope that does not hold up to one minute of scrutiny.you are literally doing the plutocrats work FOR them.
every outlet of media in the united states is owned and operated by FIVE companies.

FIVE.

and not a single one could even remotely be considered "liberal",because that does not serve their interests.

this debate is simply NOT a political debate,it is a scientific debate.
plain and simple...learn to recognize the difference buddy.

and stop being a tool for fuck sakes.../slap
you are better than that.

and just a side note,for my own personal pleasure and enjoyment:
@dannym3141 you are my fucking hero brother! between you and @newtboy i struggle to hold onto my cynicism around both of you.

you guys give me hope.

now lets go grab a smoke @bobknight33 cuz these pansies wont let me smoke inside and i have to do it on the patio and they keep trying to get me to drink that godawful "redbull" when crystal meth does a much better job.

sheesh..kids these days.

ok..enough ranting for today and smacking bob around.
ya'all stay awesome.

DIY Red Bull - Making Your Own Energy Drink

Hello Kitty in space

peter12 says...

"Animal" in space story with a happy end, niiiice.
--------
(GoPro is coping RedBull marketing strategy: Support small independent projects with high fun factor. That's not bad.)

I guess Red Bull does NOT give you wings!

The Most Amazing Rube Goldberg Machine O'All: Red Bull Kluge

Felix Baumgartner freefalls at 1000kph

ChaosEngine says...

>> ^Mauru:

Seems like the core of the question is if human achievement requires branding.


No, but it does require money. This was not a cheap endeavour and sponsorship is one of the more reliable ways of paying for it.

>> ^Mauru:

I wonder- has anyone ever checked if any of those (max speed, max height, ...) actually carry the brand-name they were achieved under with it?
Is it like the redbull height record or the virgin speed record? The malboro weather balloon?


The records themselves (outside of being catalogued by Guinness) are not branded. I assume the apparatus used to break the record is mentioned.

Felix Baumgartner freefalls at 1000kph

Mauru says...

Seems like the core of the question is if human achievement requires branding.
I wonder- has anyone ever checked if any of those (max speed, max height, ...) actually carry the brand-name they were achieved under with it?

Is it like the redbull height record or the virgin speed record? The malboro weather balloon?

I guess as long as that does not hold true I can aprecciate the idea and work, doesnt mean I have to like this shitty video representation of it though.

Felix Baumgartner freefalls at 1000kph

ChaosEngine says...

>> ^joedirt:
It isn't science or new or even interesting. It's been done and proven. USAF did exactly this in 1960. This just added a few hundred feet to their altitude.


A few hundred feet? Try an extra 30000.

>> ^kymbos:

To me, it's like those hotwheels loop-de-loop videos, except less visually arresting. Even with those you can get some 'Science!' out of it, but it's still a marketing activity.


Less visually interesting? Are you on crack? Look at that view. I would kill for the opportunity to do something like this.

I don't really believe there's an awful lot of science going on, but that's fine, it's not really about science.

Personally, if this is how Red Bull want to spend their marketing dollars, I say good on them. They sponsor a lot of cool and interesting stuff around the globe. I'm still not buying their product, but it's a lot better than being told that red bull gives you wings.

lurgee (Member Profile)

Barseps (Member Profile)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon