I didn't notice them either until the 3rd time through.>> ^ponceleon:

>> ^KnivesOut:
In all fairness I had a hard time paying attention to the subtittles as well.>> ^mintbbb:
>> ^dvst8download:
The tags have a typo, her last name is spelled Olhovskaya. Also, she's not anywhere close to 55...have you seen a women before? Playboy's 55th anniversary was in 2008, that's what she is referring to.

Lol, thanks I should have had more coffee before I was posting this. I wasn't paying enough attention tom the subtitles.


Subtitles?

>> ^KnivesOut:

In all fairness I had a hard time paying attention to the subtittles as well.>> ^mintbbb:
>> ^dvst8download:
The tags have a typo, her last name is spelled Olhovskaya. Also, she's not anywhere close to 55...have you seen a women before? Playboy's 55th anniversary was in 2008, that's what she is referring to.

Lol, thanks I should have had more coffee before I was posting this. I wasn't paying enough attention tom the subtitles.



Subtitles?

In all fairness I had a hard time paying attention to the subtittles as well.>> ^mintbbb:

>> ^dvst8download:
The tags have a typo, her last name is spelled Olhovskaya. Also, she's not anywhere close to 55...have you seen a women before? Playboy's 55th anniversary was in 2008, that's what she is referring to.

Lol, thanks I should have had more coffee before I was posting this. I wasn't paying enough attention tom the subtitles.

>> ^dvst8download:

The tags have a typo, her last name is spelled Olhovskaya. Also, she's not anywhere close to 55...have you seen a women before? Playboy's 55th anniversary was in 2008, that's what she is referring to.


Lol, thanks I should have had more coffee before I was posting this. I wasn't paying enough attention to the subtitles. They move quite quickly, and I do not read playboy

The tags have a typo, her last name is spelled Olhovskaya. Also, she's not anywhere close to 55...have you seen a women before? Playboy's 55th anniversary was in 2008, that's what she is referring to.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Going-for-that-Playboy-Smile

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by BoneRemake. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

I beat you to the punch by 23 months. Mine doesn't have music though.

http://videosift.com/video/Going-for-that-Playboy-Smile

>> ^rottenseed:

It isn't a horrible movie. Was forced by my girlfriend to watch Ryan Gosling and his wonky eyeball play another playboy role.


I agree, it wasn't horrible...Ryan Gosling does look weird though. It taught me that I'll watch anything with Emma Stone.

It isn't a horrible movie. Was forced by my girlfriend to watch Ryan Gosling and his wonky eyeball play another playboy role.

Thanks for voicing my exact sentiments and sharing some of your experiences.

I know concerned parents such as ourselves are probably more likely to have well-adjusted kids, but I still wish there could be some way to really shield their brains from being deformed by all the poison that surrounds them.

In reply to this comment by spoco2:
>> ^lucky760:
I worry often and a lot about how I can possibly keep my sons from being perverted by this society.


Ditto. I think back to me growing up and the sort of soft introduction to adult material. First you'd see topless women in National Geographics, then maybe some 'lad's mags' in the store, nothing naked, just bikini stuff... then you might get hold of a Playboy and see naked women. And back then they were pretty much natural women too (sure, not 'average', but at least not silicon and botox plumped versions).

Then you might get to see some actual porn mags at your 'rough' friend's place...

These days: "Go on web, look up sex in google image search and get inundated with hard, filthy sex"

Yeah, quite concerned. Doing our best to shield our kids from it as much as possible. Plenty of talk about what sex is (we have 3 boys and a girl all under 9), and that side of things (my wife is a midwife, so it kind of comes up a lot), but shielding as much as possible from not just sex on the internet, but also what passes for mainstream music videos these days (I mean, fucking Katy Perry... FUCK).

I'm with you lucky. I have no problem with sex... no problem with masturbation, no problem with porn in and of itself (just what 90% of it has become)... but how engrained it's become and how central and how much it's pushing into the lives of younger and younger kids.

Yeah, it's not good :

>> ^lucky760:
I worry often and a lot about how I can possibly keep my sons from being perverted by this society.


Ditto. I think back to me growing up and the sort of soft introduction to adult material. First you'd see topless women in National Geographics, then maybe some 'lad's mags' in the store, nothing naked, just bikini stuff... then you might get hold of a Playboy and see naked women. And back then they were pretty much natural women too (sure, not 'average', but at least not silicon and botox plumped versions).

Then you might get to see some actual porn mags at your 'rough' friend's place...

These days: "Go on web, look up sex in google image search and get inundated with hard, filthy sex"

Yeah, quite concerned. Doing our best to shield our kids from it as much as possible. Plenty of talk about what sex is (we have 3 boys and a girl all under 9), and that side of things (my wife is a midwife, so it kind of comes up a lot), but shielding as much as possible from not just sex on the internet, but also what passes for mainstream music videos these days (I mean, fucking Katy Perry... FUCK).

I'm with you lucky. I have no problem with sex... no problem with masturbation, no problem with porn in and of itself (just what 90% of it has become)... but how engrained it's become and how central and how much it's pushing into the lives of younger and younger kids.

Yeah, it's not good

I got hooked on Vice ever since watching Shane Smith doing coverage on North Korean labor camps in Russia (http://www.vice.com/vice-news/north-korean-labor-camps-full-length). This guy always seemed to know what was going on and what kind of games the people were trying to play on him, despite him coming from a non-native culture. I've never seen a Westerner fully understand the intricate socio-political games the locals play except for Shane Smith (http://www.vice.com/the-vice-guide-to-travel/vice-guide-to-north-korea-1-of-3).

Not even Lisa Ling, who is of Asian descent, was able to fully grasp what the North Koreans were thinking or behaving a certain way when in front of a camera. The documentary she did on North Korea really lacked fundamental understanding of North Korean life and focused on sensationalist stuff. It was really disgusting (http://youtu.be/A_268_pBvPs). Shane on the other hand focuses more on how power and economy works in the given environment. He sees the situation from multiple angles, identifies where the motive is coming from, rather than just taking in everything as fact (which most of young Vice correspondents does), then starts playing the game with the locals. The man really is intelligent.


I've read a NYTimes article about Shane Smith some time ago wanting to be a playboy millionaire like Tom Freston lol (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/fashion/19upclose.html?pagewanted=all)

Also there's a whole Vice episode about the company and Shane Smith's background. I'm watching it right now (http://www.vice.com/spike-spends-saturday-with/shane-smith-part-1)

In reply to this comment by geo321:
They go out of their way to do edgy topics though. I think you're right a bunch of the docs I've watched from them have gone nowhere. Like they gave an ambitious person a camera and said "Go!" . But more than not they do good docs. My biggest problem with Vice is their site is shit and they haven't figured out how they want to distribute their content online. They DCMA other people posting their stuff pretty quickly but don't post their own stuff themselves in a good way if at all. I heard the owner himself say his website is shit. The new youtube channel isn't very good either. My impression is that he doesn't care, but maybe it's just him becoming a billionaire and the documentary side of his empire not being a priority.

She only needs the super power of incredible sexyness... and by the way she has that in all of her movies.

>> ^luxury_pie:

I'm not kidding.>> ^artician:
>> ^luxury_pie:
Scarlett is always a good cast.>> ^artician:
>> ^Shepppard:
Ohh, that awesome genius billionaire playboy philanthropist.

He's really the only guys I'd see this for. He fits that character so well, in the same way Wolverine was so aptly cast in the Xmen films. I really wish all of these films were handled with that level of perfection, though I know that's fantasy, it would be phenomenal for everyone to see their favorite superhero portrayed by someone who had that perfect "thing" for the role.


You are kidding, aren't you?