Ricky Gervais is so great. Good intro and outro by him.

Here's the choggie PSA
send donations to his paypall account, and help us stop the madness....
(*cue grave-sounding muzak)
"Every minute, of everyday....for hundreds of thousands of years, the planet has made it clear; humans are part of the solution to a critical problem: Organic Compost. In unquenchable furnaces like Etna, Stromboli, and Yasur, along with allll her numerous and hidden, underwater fissures, pumping out what it takes to balance the odds in her favor, she remains dedicated....and with overdue kegs of life-stealing sulfuric acid like Yellowstone, Fuji, Etna, ready to pop, along with Mr. Shinyhot(the yellow round thing), she insures that long after this current iteration of human planetary activity, that there will be a layer of shit like plastic and tin cans, for the next monkeys to enjoy.
Global Climate Change. Aren't ya glad you can say you were there when self-absorbed putties had reason to suspect they made more than a scratch, in the planet's surface???
Give, to the United Negro College Fund, a mind is a terr....oh wait, wrong outro-

Wu-tang sampled the outro..Video was solid!! *High 5 my brother*

Fixed, but the only version I could find has a really annoying intro and outro, please ignore.

Aha- YouTube comments to the rescue, the music is:

its the outro to the most recent Last Days of Humanity album. it's also the longest song (3:19) by about 2 minutes on the whole album.

You can see her seethe at the end as Khatshits does his outro-A good strategy to discredit this tool organization, would be for all the folks who grudgingly take a stab at a Fox interview, to unite on the model, for an outro by the guest, when one got to this level of asscissitude....like a book slap. (scream would be good for a female....men could perhaps jump up on the desk and do a butt-spin....)

don't take this personally, I just hate videos with the slow motion outro after such a short clip.

HEY, i even adhered to your top 7

IMPROVE SIFT QUALITY!!

No TITLES missing VITAL info (same for the tags)
No screwed ASPECT RATIO
No SLOW MOTION where not needed
No lame INTROS or outros
No FLASH animations converted to a video
No COMPILATIONS
No pointless SOUNDTRACKS

replacement: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQi2tHlecoA

it has a stupid outro, though

not only this is fixed now, but also is a better embed than the previous one, that was plagued by a DUMB intro and outro

i'd like to upvote but that intro and outro kill me

we've already been over why your post got discarded so I am going to spend very little time on it as I tire of going round and round with you about it....

So all I have to say further on the matter is that I think it would not have mattered if there was more discussion on the matter... an admin chose to enforce the rules, the vid was a blatant duplicate and that is that, end of story. Besides, I think there was plenty of material there already for lucky to make an informed decision, I really think you need to accept it and move on.

More important to our conversation, and this is the part I hope you LISTEN to and take to heart: Your arguments over the post and your newfound obession with *quality do not hold much weight with other sifters because of both your attitude and you modus operandi. For instance, when you say things like the following:

"sometimes i give very little weight to what somebody says, but i do that only when i have a reason to think their opinions are worthless"

"if sifters want a worst sift, i'm not the one martyr trying to keep them from harming themselves"

and there are many more I'm too busy at the moment to hunt down... but the point is, when you enter into an argument here you more often than not sound like a GIANT DOUCHE and you shouldn't be surprised when people respond to you in kind... probably more than a few sifters here would like to reach through the series of tubes seperating you from them and throttle you, I have certainly felt that urge on more than one occasion.

You need to accept that you are not "all that we ask of a God and more" (I think that was how your profile used to go), and therefore, nobody here is going to feel inclined to treat you with any measure of respect until you earn it.

Also, and I find this perhaps the most disturbing part of how you handled the soccer-post debacle... you were basically blackmailing ockhamist to change the embed code on his post. By saying, do this and I will do this, and pretty much holding that over his head, is, by definition, blackmail, and I have to say right now, if I ever catch you trying to do this again, I will take it up with the admins... you have to learn to play nice looris.

In addition to this, I've noticed that you've changed your profile to reflect some newfound values:

No TITLES missing VITAL info (same for the tags)
No screwed ASPECT RATIO
No SLOW MOTION where not needed
No lame INTROS or outros
No COMPILATIONS
No pointless SOUNDTRACKS

This is great, I'm all for sift quality, but let me just tell you now, that if you start going about downvoting everything that does not meet the looris stamp of approval you are only going to make more enemies, so therefore, I don't recommend it. Some people like slo-mo, and some people like compilations- especially when they enchance the content of a collective. I think you need to accept that stuff will always be posted to the sift that you personally do not like, that is how it is. If you are not cool with that then I suggest you just leave and start your own 'looris-approved' vid-blog.

Really, downvoting to bolster your own agenda does nothing to enhance the sift... just think about it, if everyone who hated family guy (and there are many of us) did this, just how many vids do you think you would have published? You've got a gold star now, play with your new powers and your collective and be happy. Enhance the sift by posting good quality vids and maintaining a successful collective, but don't do it by bumming things out for others... everybody wants a gold star, and more, don't piss on their dreams just because you happen to dislike slo-mo... Or rather, as a compromise, if you still feel you have to downvote if only to make the statement that "I looris, am not down with the slo-mo" make it after the vid is published, that way nobody gets upset... for the most part, this is what ant does, and we've all come to just accept him for it.

It is well done, although if I could I'd downvote for it being a 11 second clip with 18 seconds of intro and outro graphics.

He started off well enough, making pretty challenging music that commented on pop culture and on rock music as live theater. But this song just sounds like $dollar signs$ to me... a repetitive, standard (inst-intro, verse1, chorus1, bridge into chorus2, verse2, chorus2, bridge back to chorus1, alternate-chorus, chorus1, outro) progression track with distortion on the vocals and guitar, and lyrics about being a rock star and how old people are tools (and he is not).

I guess I'm still upset that The Fragile never ushered in a golden age of heady, anti-pop rock like it was supposed to. Does this not sound like a distorted Blur track from, like, 1994?

dumb intro and outro, my god, what was that guy thinking???