search results matching tag: opinions

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.004 seconds

    Videos (592)     Sift Talk (169)     Blogs (55)     Comments (1000)   

bobknight33 (Member Profile)

newtboy says...

Why did Elon block “whitedudesforHarris” from Twitter?
He won’t say, but I bet it has something to do with fundraising $4 million in one day through his platform for Harris.

So…lemme guess…you don’t have an issue with this election interference, but you thought blocking covid disinformation or Hunter’s dick pics was treason.

😂Laura Loomer, the felon’s surrogate, bull dog, and spokesperson said “[The felon] has a Fulton County mug shot, his own sneaker line, and 3 baby mamas. [The Felon] is blacker than Kamala Harris will ever be!"😂
Can even you think this horrifically racist statement will gain him minority votes? Do you even see the overt racism in such a degrading blanket statement that publicly displays his campaign’s and his unbelievably low opinion of minorities?

Analysis of Judge Canon's dismissal of classified docs case

newtboy says...

Uh oh…Cannon is now being investigated for judicial malpractice, and 100% of non MAGA lawyers (not just liberals) agree that’s what she did, and should be removed from the bench immediately. That may be the outcome soon…she was counting on a Trump election win and simple pardon end to the case (she knows full well the appeal will win, her decision like every other was a delay tactic and nothing but).

Federal laws legitimize the appointment, you read 4 of them that do. The only Supreme Court writing is a singular dissenting opinion by comprised bought and paid for criminal Justice Thomas…who doesn’t have long on the bench.
Thomas is now terrified because he will be removed for malpractice in January when the complicit criminal MAGA loses its obstruction powers and he is impeached. He also counts on a Trump win to protect his job and power.

bobknight33 said:

@newtboy.

Smith got kicked to the curb because he was not ligit. As stated by the Federal laws and Supreme court writings.

Improperly appointed Smith got the case dismissed.

The case can be re tried with a proper appointed counsel.

Analysis of Judge Canon's dismissal of classified docs case

newtboy says...

You watched it? I doubt it. Presented such? What did you present? A statement based on no facts and one “judge” whose every actual decision has been overturned? (That’s why all the “paperless orders”…they aren’t decisions that could be appealed)

He points to 4 paragraphs of laws that each present legal basis for special prosecutors assigned by the AG (and other department heads, and congress). That’s 4 times he proved her wrong when she said there’s no basis to legally appoint them. He also pointed to multiple cases where those statutes were SUCCESSFULLY used to defend special prosecutors appointments, some that went to the Supreme Court, including Nixon’s. There are no cases where a court has found their appointment to be illegal…except this one by Cannon. That’s why I don’t think you watched.

You provided no such decision. You posted a moron in his mommy’s basement giving his opinion as he skips through the pages and reads tweets from the likes of parking lot lawyer Alina Habba.
It’s 90 pages long. Show me where you did in readable form without some morons head over half the page, I’ll gladly read it in its entirety knowing ahead of time exactly what it’s lacking, citation or precedent, and what it is omitting, a sane reading of at least 4 laws covering the appointment of special counsel by the AG and acceptance of over 50 years of precedent including the Nixon case where he also challenged the appointment but lost.
I know for certain with your English skills you wouldn’t understand half of the first paragraph without someone explaining slowly.

You have never applauded truth, you cannot ever recognize it and shun it with eyes and ears closed when it’s forced on you….you have still never once retracted a single one of the thousands of lies you’ve spread…like the disgusting lie you gleefully told as often as possible when an elderly man survived an assasination attempt and you said “No politics involved, no MAGA, Pelosi was attacked by his own boyfriend”. You meant it. It was a politically motivated assassination attempt by a Trumpist Qanon believer, now convicted. You still stick with the lie.
You never will retract any of your lies because you and your ilk HATE truth and only deal in lies, because you sir are a liar, plain and simple…a simpleton and a liar.

bobknight33 said:

@newtboy
You so full of shit newt. I did watch. I presented such.



This clown video points to 4 paragraphs to "prove" and opine his BS and leads fools like you to buy it

I provide the actual Judges decision use to show Jacks Smith improper appointment.

This allows each of us to decide for our self -- from source material not some ass clown opinion.




I applaud truth - where ever it stands.

Analysis of Judge Canon's dismissal of classified docs case

bobknight33 says...

@newtboy
You so full of shit newt. I did watch. I presented such.



This clown video points to 4 paragraphs to "prove" and opine his BS and leads fools like you to buy it

I provide the actual Judges decision use to show Jacks Smith improper appointment.

This allows each of us to decide for our self -- from source material not some ass clown opinion.




I applaud truth - where ever it stands.

newtboy said:

It’s ok @bobknight33…we know that 1) you would never watch this and 2) the precise language, specific terms, and legal citation would go so far over your head that you couldn’t see them
The defense judge subverted the law and Justice to protect one man for purely political reasons. Nothing could be more obvious. You applaud this politically motivated degradation of the law and long standing checks and balances our government is founded on…nothing could be less surprising.

bobknight33 (Member Profile)

newtboy says...

Melania - “I’m just here so I don’t get fined.”
Her distain for Trump and MAGA was on FULL display, from the late arrival to the dodged kiss to the look of disgust at Hogan and Kid Rock now being the Lowest Common Denominator representatives for the L.C.D. party and candidate. Not so great when the soft core porn star trophy wife of great leader is looking at you all in disgust. Melania Marcos is not pleased.
I guess it’s better than plagiarizing Michelle Obama’s speech in it’s entirety again.

Oh no….JD Vance - It’s a mistake to let women in violent abusive marriages escape them through divorce. (Because ending divorce, abortion, birth control, recreational sex, porn, and spousal rape as a crime are all part of project 2025, your party platform).
Also recently blamed all of America’s problems on “childless cat women” in positions of power and said women with no children shouldn’t get a say in American politics (and insinuated women with children should be too busy raising them to have an opinion). How long before women lose their vote in Project MAGA 2025? Not long….but men will be close behind.

bobknight33 (Member Profile)

newtboy says...

Holy sheep shit! The CIA has released information about a plot by Trump/Kushner in Oct 2020 to set up a secret communication channel with Russia using Russian diplomatic facilities in order to avoid any American monitoring of the pre-inauguration discussions (but clearly Russia would know all). Just one more instance of maga selling America to our long term enemies, in your eyes another “nothingburger” like every crime Trump commits, but if Biden did anything close it would be treason that requires a civil war.

Meanwhile maga representatives are saying on camera that everything they do in the House of Representatives should be about electing Trump…not protecting America, not improving the economy, not addressing immigration, not working to solve America’s issues, not anything positive, just help Donny….but nooooo…it’s not a cult. 😂

The judge actually corrected VonShitsinpants’s lies from the bench, namely the idiotic lie that the gag order means he cannot testify, a pure total lie he’s telling his moronic followers to excuse his not testifying…because there’s no way in hell he’s testifying without convicting himself of multiple crimes, he’s absolutely incapable, everybody knows it. It seems he was trying to set up an ineffectual council defense pretending his lawyer told him the gag order stops him from testifying or is even in effect inside court…the judge destroyed that weak attempt by correcting the lie on the record, Trump CAN testify, he chooses not to, just like every other case he’s been convicted of, he never testifies, it’s the smartest move he’s ever made.
His second chair lawyer ruined her legal reputation today arguing with Merchan over getting pre approval to violate the gag order again by retweeting posts that violate the orders, which is not a thing. The judge obviously turned them down, saying the order is crystal clear on its face, judges don’t give advisory opinions to defendants, and if they’re unsure if they’re about to violate the order AGAIN maybe just don’t post it, duh.

Came out today from people in the room that when sanctions were being set he tried to remove China from the countries being sanctioned because Xi was nice to him on the phone and so he promised he would.
Also in court today, Trump and Cohen on tape discussing setting up payments to his mistresses, how to hide the payments and not pay in cash, etc. 😂

PS- STILL WAITING!

How to make a Paperclip Cube

noims says...

OR...

Given that the verb 'to cube' could mean to make something into a cube, maybe that's actually Clippy and he was was forced to make this video.

My opinion is as valid as yours. At very least we should teach the controversy.

bremnet said:

Um. Not an engineer or anything, but those aren't paperclips. Retitle?

President Biden Delivers Remarks

newtboy says...

Oh fuck. Talk about made up opinions! 😂

Trump’s actual stated defense before Judge Cannon in the stolen documents case is that now all those stolen top level highly classified “DO NOT REMOVE FROM SCIF OR TAKE NOTES” state secrets he secretly stole from a SCIF without declassifying any of it and took home to store in his open to the public hallways and ballrooms are old, so aren’t really secrets anymore, so he can’t be charged with stealing state secrets.

Of course, that’s complete and utter nonsense because 1) they were fresh actionable intelligence documents when he stole them and 2) they were and still are still classified top secrets it’s illegal to remove from a SCIF, yes even for the president, and 3) this defense 100% lets Biden off the hook, his documents were older and less sensitive. 😂 Thanks Don.

bobknight33 said:

So your made up opinion is better than the DOJ report.

You are dripping with arrogance.

Democrats only care about Illegals, not Americans

kir_mokum says...

i don't watch your stuff because you're a racist piece of shit who's opinion and world view is of no value even as an intellectual curio nor are you worth engaging with in any way other than downvoting and moving on. this very comment is a waste of time.

bobknight33 said:

Sifters wont watch this becaues they can handle this.

President Biden Delivers Remarks

newtboy says...

No idiot, what I said is what’s in the reports, not my opinion.
You are dripping with ignorance…arrogant ignorance.

Still waiting.

bobknight33 said:

So your made up opinion is better than the DOJ report.

You are dripping with arrogance.

President Biden Delivers Remarks

bobknight33 says...

So your made up opinion is better than the DOJ report.

You are dripping with arrogance.

newtboy said:

Yes, that kind of clearance, Mr Know Nothing. He had clearance to have every document in his personal possession when he received them, unlike Trump who illegally and secretly stole them from secured facilities. His mistake was trusting his staff to properly forward them to the archives when they packed his senate, and later VP offices.

No, ex senators and ex presidents both don’t have clearance to KEEP classified documents, correct. Trump did not ever have clearance to remove nuclear secrets and other highly classified material from a SCIF, not as president and not after, and it endangers the nation that he did so. It requires written declassification by the DOE, the president cannot declassify nuclear secrets under any circumstances.

The DOJ report indicated Biden did not know his staff had stored a few (6) unlabeled low level classified documents at his secure locked think tank office and personal handwritten notes at his guarded and locked home library (namely a few daily briefs on Afghanistan and some handwritten notes he had made, nothing at all designated top secret), indicated he himself (or attorneys at his instruction) looked for them and immediately reported finding them to the FBI, and allowed them to search that and other properties without requiring a warrant.
The DOJ report also indicated Trump DID know he was illegally taking and retaining highest sensitivity most stringently classified top secret documents by the truckload, not just a small part of one box, refused to return them when asked by the archives, lied about having any, required a warrant for a search, actively hid them when searched, lied again about having MORE, lied about showing them to multiple other parties including foreign agents but was caught red handed on tape, claimed personal ownership (of nuclear secrets), kept them unsecured in public areas, tried to destroy video evidence, claimed they were planted, obstructed Justice multiple times…
…must I go on for you to see the difference, or comprehend why one faces no charge and the other treason?
I’m certain the answer is yes, you haven’t heard enough to admit the situations are completely different despite the fact that one is staff improperly packing up his office when he left it, the other one individual intentionally stealing hundreds of state secrets for personal gain at the nation’s expense…you can never hear enough evidence to admit that.

Is Maddow still on? Sorry Charlie, like I’ve told you a hundred times but you can never recall, I’ve never watched CNN beyond short YouTube clips, not before they went right wing certainly not since. In fact, I think it’s likely that you watch more CNN than I do, you sure like to post and quote them now. If she’s still on and is saying the same things I’m not surprised, she was a smart wonky cookie last I saw.
It’s hilarious when you don’t know my sources, because when you can’t try to impugn the source over nonsense you have no argument at all, just rambling nonsensical insanity spewed from your mouth like explosive diarrhea.

Me thinks you have too little brain in the brain.

😂 Talk about projection! What a confession. 😂

Everything Trump said in that idiotic speech was a lie about Biden and an admission of what he himself did.
I won’t insult your minimal intelligence by pretending you actually believe the delusional ramblings you just posted, they would make a good case for insanity if he believed it, but we all know he doesn’t.
Every word of that insanity was a total fabrication of a delusional mind.

The presidential records act absolutely doesn’t give him the right to take top secret classified documents home when he leaves office, or retain them, or lie under oath about having them, or defy warrants for them, or show them to otherS, NONE OF THAT IS LEGAL UNDER THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT.
Trump obstructed Justice at every possible turn, destroying evidence hiding documents, he still has an unsearched secret room in his bedroom not disclosed when the FBI searched, so likely has MORE stolen documents still. Biden cooperated more than fully with the investigation, which even the political hack Trump appointed special prosecutor admitted.
…and Biden had a grand total of 20 documents or notes designated “classified”, none top secret…Trump had over 325 well marked classified FILES containing multiple classified documents each including I think a dozen or more of the highest most secret files the government has, files never supposed to leave a SCIF and not declassifiable by the president under any circumstances.
Not one word he said was true, and you know it, fool.
That speech if not intentional lies is proof Trumpist Alzheimer’s has progressed to the point of total delusion.

PS- Still waiting.

How Al Green Ruined The Impeachment Scam

newtboy says...

😂 Total 100% exoneration! 😂

The political hit piece fabricated by a Trumpist operative tried in every dishonest way to impugn his character, proving conclusively that it’s not an investigatory report it’s an editorial opinion article, but even he could not make even a minor case for criminality even to MAGgots willing to believe anything no matter how hard he twisted the evidence.
There’s no evidence of any crimes, that’s why there’s no recommendation for prosecution.

😂 100% exoneration, absolutely zero evidence of any possible criminality, unlike Trump who has provided 100% proof of treasonous criminality in dozens of ways. 😂

Edit: Meanwhile Trump doesn’t know who is president today, who he was in an election against in 2016, or who was president in 2020, does not recall that we already fought WW2, doesn’t know foreign leaders or countries, can’t distinguish Haley from Pelosi, and often doesn’t know where he is…all proven repeatedly in videos of him trying to speak at high school gymnasiums that can’t be filled, videos that include the crowds leaving as he speaks because they’re hearing the dementia unfiltered and it’s a turn off.
When you talk about Biden flubbing words 95% of the time you can’t provide video, just snide comments from biased third parties, and when you can provide video it’s highly edited to pretend a slight stutter is a mental disorder. Every time you actually see him speak unedited even you have admitted he was surprisingly lucid and intelligent. Trump’s gaffs need no such production, they’re unavoidable every time you watch him speak in a rambling stream of consciousness for even just 30 seconds.

bobknight33 said:

DOJ found Joe guilty as hell for holding classified documents but too feeble to prosecute . Yet Feeble Joe stays POTUS. This wont age well,

Palestinian UN Ambassador At UN

newtboy says...

“ It’s your insistence that Jewish people, and the existence of Israel, have always fundamentally been invaders that I was objecting to as it is so intensely at odds with factual history.”
No…it is at odds with your position and is not what I said.
It is factual history that fighting age European Jews came armed and forcibly displaced the natives after being offered sanctuary for their most needy. It is not factual that I claimed it was ever thus. That is clearly not what I said, I said for 10+- years they were getting along as refugees, then started coming in HUGE numbers illegally and taking over.

Those are facts.

I also mentioned a native Jewish population that were not refugees or invaders. Some of them supported the invading Zionists, some didn’t. I’ve never heard of one who opposed them.

“ You gave a brief nod on not being a scholar of Palestinian history, but then proceed to just count all Jewish refugees as good as Zionist aggressors from day 1(or close enough), and the local Arab population as nothing but pure, kind caring victims of these invaders.”

Not even close to true, I said many stood behind the Zionists when they started coming en masse, and didn’t say but seemingly few to none of the native Jews opposed them. I also was clear that at the beginning the refugees acted like refugees, not invaders….I mistakenly gave them more time being grateful than you say they were, according to you Palestinians position is they began the invasion in the 20’s….and theirs is the opinion I care about. I never claimed ALL Arabs were welcoming, but the “nation” as a whole (despite being not self ruling at the time) welcomed a huge number of refugees considering their own population. Way more than elsewhere.

Edit: Britain, who facilitated this invasion, only took in 80000 European Jews in the decade before and during the war, and they were only given transit visas to stay temporarily until they found other accommodations. All of England took in fewer Jewish refugees in all pre war history than Palestine did….England took in 80000, most on temporary visas, Palestine took in 60000 permanently in 1935 alone, and 130000 in 33-36.
Pre-immigration Palestine had about 700000 people. In 1944 European Jews ignored the 1500 visa limit per year and came by the hundred of thousands per year after already completely overwhelming the native population.
Palestine was forcibly invaded by a foreign population exponentially bigger than the native population while Britain kept them too weak to oppose it physically.
That’s an invasion…not on day 1. 🤦‍♂️

“ without being able to writeoff Israel as invaders from day 1, nuance enters the calculus and suddenly the conflict is flooded with shades of grey ”

Again, I said day 3, not day 1, and went on to say that meant 10 years later. Get off your high horse and READ buddy.

I guess I’ll stop here. If you aren’t going to read what I wrote and insist on arguing red herrings you made up yourself, you can do that alone.

Nothing you’ve said changes or excuses the fact that masses of armed violent invaders came to take the land from the natives by force and were successful. The exact date this happened is not only y highly subjective, it’s completely besides the point.
Nothing you’ve said changes or excuses the inhuman treatment they’ve subjected the innocent native civilian population to for 70 years…but you’ve tried.
Nothing you’ve said changes or excuses the intentional targeting of trapped civilians by the military….serious war crimes Israel commits daily.
Nothing you’ve said even hints that you consider Palestinians worthy of consideration themselves, possibly not even human status, definitely not peaceful existence.

Bye

Palestinian UN Ambassador At UN

newtboy says...

A reasoned and relatively factual position. Congratulations, but….
In my and many expert’s opinions the deadly indiscriminate pressure is exactly what pushes desperate and grieving innocent civilian Palestinians into Hamas’s arms. You would create two terrorists for every one caught with the inhumane treatment of the civilian population…and commit a serious war crime in the process.

Israel should abandon all expansionist settlements from the last 30 years and free the Palestinian citizens from the oppressive genocidal apartheid they’ve forced on the population for decades. That would end the conflict tomorrow, instead Israel has telegraphed its intent to take over Gaza militarily and occupy it again…and America stands by their side, but not all Americans.

If America had spent 10% of what we spend supplying Israel with weapons they use on civilians instead on building infrastructure, schools, hospitals, roads in Gaza, the Palestinians would not rightly see us as racist enemies, and might have the resources and inclination to oust Hamas. But we don’t.

Palestine gets no aid. You can’t withhold something that never existed. The reason Hamas gets any support is they do supply Gaza with food and medicine while Israel and America just embargo entire populations because a terrorist group lives in the country. Think if the world did the same, bombing cities flat and starving America because the Boogaloo Boys live in America.

Hamas is not Palestine, they’re the warlord gang that took over from the intentionally weakened Palestinian parliament and the only group supporting Palestinian civilians (while also using them as shields and cannon fodder).

Hamas fucked around, but Israel is making innocent Palestinian civilians “find out”. That’s a serious war crime that should put every Israeli soldier in prison, and get Netanyahu executed.

bobknight33 said:

Hamas took over the Gaza Strip after a brief civil war back in 2006 / 2007 . Before that Fatah was a major Palestinian political party that began in 1965 as the Palestinian National Liberation Movement. Fatah wanted to negotiate back to the 67 boundaries.

Hamas – Does not recognize Israel, but accepts a Palestinian state on 1967 borders
Fatah – Recognizes Israel, wants to build a state on 1967 borders






Israel should stop advancing and leave it to the Palestine to find and and capture Hamas.
To pressure this no aid to Palestine. Their desperation will weed out Hamas.

bobknight33 (Member Profile)

newtboy says...

😂 Way to drop your latest racist defense attempt for murderous cops like a molten steel potato after I poked it so full of holes there was nothing left. 😂

What are you talking about?
That’s the deal she offered under the first time offender program…cooperate, fulfill your lengthy probation and community service sentence and fines, and the charge is expunged. Until then it’s deferred. Fail to fulfill all the requirements or fail to fully cooperate with the prosecutors, you’re a felon and your probation gets revoked and trial starts, likely with you remanded. That’s how it works.
What do you think this means, bob?
Clearly you think it’s some loss somehow. Please explain yourself….by yourself, not with some internet troll video.
It’s a guilty plea that (legally, not in the court of public opinion or memory) goes away if conditions are met…like the others got. Did you not know or something? 😂
I would agree, they all should serve prison time so in that sense I feel it’s a small loss for justice, but also a bigger win.

They had been offered immunity deals with no fines, no probation, no community service, no guilty plea to felonies that stick if they don’t fulfill every requirement and no referral to the bar and instead went this route with all those repercussions and still are cooperating now. Sure sounds to me like they all lost big for no good reason.



The point is she now admits under oath that there was never any of the evidence she claimed, never a stolen election, and they knew it. She’s going to cooperate prosecuting the big fish, and will likely be disbarred for her lies.
How is that a loss, Bob? What?!? 🤦‍♂️

Not so hollow after all…in fact it’s atomic.

Edit: oh sweet zombie Jeebus…Trumps lawyers just filed in federal court in his Jan 6 trial claiming that he had not been charged with any crime in the case!

He’s charged with 4. 1 count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, 1 count of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, 1 count of obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and 1 count of conspiracy against rights.

This is his best defense…pretend he’s on trial for nothing because they have no defense to the charges. It’s not going to work.

How do you put on a defense against no charges? You don’t. 😂

bobknight33 said:

@newtboy
Fani LOSES Again! Jenna Ellis Charges DEFERRED with NO Judgment of GUILT
<iframe width="560" heig



A hollow wedgie at best



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon