Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Must I point out the irony of someone with the handle "Truth is the Nemesis" downvoting this sift?

BTW, whether you agree with him or not, in this one there's an Obama for everyone!

@blankfist I think you are playing a more serious game here than I am. I'm not trying to intimidate you. Just making a point and having a hearty discussion with my arch nemesis. It is kind of awesome to have an arch nemesis, just like the movies. Good clean fun.

Might as well have this conversation here too in case others want to partake....

@progressivevideo A free market is impossible, which is why one has never existed, and why you were unable to come up with any working examples. I understand the distinction, my point is that markets don't want to be truly free. Whenever there is a power vacuum, someone will fill it, which is why democracy came into being.

Let's do a little thought experiment. You support property rights, no? Do you think there should be any limits on how much property a person can own?

Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

>> ^CheshireSmile:

>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:
no more bullying, yet you still label them 'queers'. (sure that won't anger any more gay people.


as i understand it, "queer" is a generally non-offensive label, much like if he just called him "a gay."


Not when it comes from homophobic pieces of shit like this asshole.

>> ^lampishthing:

Nah, it's cool. My gay friend tells me they're trying to take the word back. More importantly, the guy is clearly endowing the word with respect. See "Queer Theory" and "Queer Studies".
>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:
no more bullying, yet you still label them 'queers'. (sure that won't anger any more gay people.



totally what i was thinking of. also "we're here, we're queer, get used to it."

Nah, it's cool. My gay friend tells me they're trying to take the word back. More importantly, the guy is clearly endowing the word with respect. See "Queer Theory" and "Queer Studies".

>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:

no more bullying, yet you still label them 'queers'. (sure that won't anger any more gay people.

>> ^CheshireSmile:

>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:
no more bullying, yet you still label them 'queers'. (sure that won't anger any more gay people.


as i understand it, "queer" is a generally non-offensive label, much like if he just called him "a gay."


It has been reclaimed to some extent, but "queer" is definitely still offensive IMHO.

It's kind of ironic, this guy's homophobia was "cured" in the same way sexual reorientation camps "cure" gay people - by having their natural manner forcibly put into the closet.

>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:

no more bullying, yet you still label them 'queers'. (sure that won't anger any more gay people.



as i understand it, "queer" is a generally non-offensive label, much like if he just called him "a gay."

Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Moving this video to truth-is-the-nemesis's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:

gandalf is right! - ron burgundy Paul is a Anti-war candidate, unless of course all members of congress agree by a large percentage to invade Iran or Syria, then it's just fine & dandy. & what are the chances of THAT happening?...



Actually, he is still against war and is for dialog... I think he has stated that in EVERY speech and debate he has ever made... Face it, that argument of yours is superficial at best and beneath you Mr. Truth...

In fact, Paul goes on to include sanctions in the category of war--something "anti-war" hypocritical advocate as an alternative to war. (Like tazing someone in the head 20 times instead of shooting him...)

@marinara

I will only support DTF if he gives out free promotes to me!

@dystopianfuturetoday

You know I am racist right? I don't like it--but that is how life has formed me... A group treats me with hate, I treat them back in kind motherfucker... The same reason I hate redneck country bumpkins... much like the hate spewed against Cops, Conservatives and the religious on this site, now that I think of it. (Oh, and it's also the reason I am fine with African Americans. For the most part I have had great experiences with most.)

Now, there are limits. I don't allow it to affect the way I treat people--all are equal. I don't teach it to my children. And I don't preach it.

But to blame Paul for writing (Perhaps he did or did not, I don't care) a paper years ago is utterly ridiculous. People change, who knows. You certainly don't. All I know is he hasn't wrote new hate since then, or at least it isn't widely known.

And, I might add, politicians have done far worse to obtain office than pander to the racist elements. (I still don't condone it.)