>> ^chicchorea:

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/NASA-Finds-DNA-Components-in-Meteorites

This video has been declared a duplicate by the original submitter; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by lucky760.

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by chicchorea. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/NASA-Finds-DNA-Components-in-Meteorites

Oh god! In pizza parlors as a boy I was taught to shoot meteorites... D:

Fun to see.

Like watching a meteorite pause to sing us a song.

In reply to this comment by Payback:
>> ^PalmliX:

I love how these spacecraft's are still doing science work and prompting new discoveries. Truly a spectacular feat of engineering!


Either that or it's electronics have been so degraded by ionizing radiation and it's sensors pocked by micro-meteorites that it's just shittin' with us.

jeez I hope not! Although you'd think the scientists collecting the data would know the difference between actual measurements and corrupted data?

>> ^PalmliX:

I love how these spacecraft's are still doing science work and prompting new discoveries. Truly a spectacular feat of engineering!


Either that or it's electronics have been so degraded by ionizing radiation and it's sensors pocked by micro-meteorites that it's just shittin' with us.

>> ^KnivesOut:

Pfft, god scoffs at peer review.
Also, fossil hat lol.>> ^westy:
The age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Can you show me scientific , peer reviewed paper or study that invalidates all the methods used that currently point to the age of the earth being well over 6k years old ?
Also there is no way to know that the bible is the word of god or not just something made up by man.



"This quick-forming 'stone' hat adds weight to the claims that creation scientists are correct when they say that thousands or millions of years are not needed to form rocks and fossilize animals and plants."

LOL thats so mental I like how it omits the fact that you can tell by the location of items if it was formed in this specific process , and that calcification is decernably different from focalization.

I don't get how stupid can survive for so long and keeps going on you would hope that stupid ideas / stupid things would die out over time.

Pfft, god scoffs at peer review.

Also, fossil hat lol.>> ^westy:
The age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Can you show me scientific , peer reviewed paper or study that invalidates all the methods used that currently point to the age of the earth being well over 6k years old ?
Also there is no way to know that the bible is the word of god or not just something made up by man.

>> ^shinyblurry:

Yes, 6000 years. Don't take my word for it..look up the artifacts he mentions. The bible says that before the flood humans were quite advanced..and this is evidence for it. Can our understanding of history account for ancient batteries that generate electricity? How about a computer that can do addition subtraction multiplication and division? Models of modern airplanes? Heiroglyphics of helicopters? Obviously we have it wrong if any of those things existed. Wake up, you're being lied to.
>> ^kulpims:
shiny, you christians are total idiots. you advocate that the Earth, universe, everything is like, what - 6000 years old? and now you come up with this bullshit ...



The age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Can you show me scientific , peer reviewed paper or study that invalidates all the methods used that currently point to the age of the earth being well over 6k years old ?

Don't u think that the whole universe is under 6 k years old as well ?

Also there is no way to know that the bible is the word of god or not just something made up by man. So you are basing your whole motivation and argument of a book that contains fictional stories , incosistancies , has been edited over the years , no real direction as to what is Allegory or what is meant to be read as factual / literal.

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html

Just in case you don't know , you realize there is nothing stopping creationists gathering actual evidence and putting together scientific theories that are better than the current ones and as a result proving that the earth is 6k years old if it in fact was ?

Since I had no "home base" video to work with or enough information, I posted a video that includes ALL clips I could find of the Edmonton,Canada meteor/meteorite. Hope that is what you were posting.

I know we'd really like to believe this but I can't find anything about this on any serious website, and I think if it was real, there would be more news on it.
Upon looking, while I did find many sites picking up the story using the exact same article as every other one, I did come across this one site and article. It's the only one I could find that clearly states this truly is a hoax and I couldn't find any information backing up a hoax confession by David Salmanin so I guess it's still open to personal interpretation:

"On April 1st a story broke that a botanist had discovered an incredible species that appeared to have come from an extraterrestrial source. The new species not only had the characteristics of a more traditional form of cactus, but also a few others that led one botanist to believe it was from outer space. Of course when he said he first discovered the plant in Roswell, New Mexico from a meteorite the paranormal community was already beginning to get skeptical. But all lingering doubts were removed with the prankster came clean shortly afterward and said his cactus story had been a big prank to raise awareness of cacti.

David Salman, of High County Gardens first developed the prank to air footage of a known terrestrial species of alien cactus as a more deliberate and unusual brand of alien invader which he named Ariocarpus extraterrestrialensis. Ariocarpus was chosen as the creatures did resemble a terrestrial form of cactus species going by that name, and extraterrestrialensisafter his belief that the strange plants had actually originated among the stars. But thins have been quickly developed into a far more elaborate prank than Salman likely had hoped for as a good natured bit of fun. And when your life's work includes studying cacti in the desert, you're familiar with your work resulting in a few jabs. Luckily, however, Salman was able to come clean long before the story got too out of control." - http://www.unexplainable.net/UFO-Alien/Alien-Cactus-Story-an-April-Spoof.shtml

I guess I should have said "meteorite had hit her", got to be careful with phrasing.

technically, that's a meteorite and not a meteor.