Yes, but as I said, the majority of ACTIVE, self labeled "feminists" are the man hating brand today, and it's causing many to no longer self label themselves 'feminist' lest they be confused with this vocal majority.

You ignore the pervasive and destructive culture of rape of women by women in prison as well, or the pervasive and destructive culture of rape of men by women outside of prison. Yes, it happens, and is prosecuted far more rarely for various reasons, marginalizing those real victims....just like these "feminists" do, pretending all men are rapists, and all women are victims. It's simply not true, and it muddies and sullies any real point they might have about equality.
I think you know I was using hyperbole to make a point. I don't advocate anyone being raped in real life...not even mass rapists, but I do see that it might be the only way to show SOME people who have a total lack of empathy for people that don't hold their mindset.

"Master"? I thought they said "dean". Is that the same thing? EDIT: If so, the dean is not a guidance counselor/therapist any more than a judge is outside college. They have guidance counselors and therapists for those jobs.

The point being, you said white men don't need protection because they can just shrug it off or, to quote..."We can pretty much take it; we as a group already have most of the money, most of the privilege, and most of the presidents. We don't need a safe space." ...do you still say that seeing how he's NOT capable of just 'shrugging it off' and ignoring them, knowing that many have lost their careers for simply not agreeing with this brand of PC-Nazi?
EDIT: Would you say that to a man who's been raped by a woman? How about a white man raped by a woman of color? Not about the rape itself, but that they still have all the power and can 'pretty much take it/they don't need a 'safe space'', while implying these kids can't take it and do need a safe space?

@ReverendTed @vaire2ube Akin was suggesting that we can somehow tell if a rape is real based on whether the victim get's pregnant or not. It's not about determining the facts of a case based on evidence, criminal investigation, or whatever, it's because he's using some Victorian superstitious bullshit idea about what constitutes a "legitimate rape".

So no, in that regard we shouldn't be trying to parse rape into "real rape", "fake rape", "date rape", "man rape", "butt rape", "legitimate rape", "illegitimate rape", or any other kind of rape.

Care of The Onion: Pregnant Woman Relieved To Learn Her Rape Was Illegitimate

3 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Hybrid.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Dave-Chappelle-on-Man-Rape

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Deano. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
^Joe, your reply missed the point. The system looks after itself. Of course the courts are going to rule with local law enforcement authorities, that has a long tradition. The courts also approved separate but equal facilities, then reversed their decision years later. Their decisions aren't always entirely based in legal precedent, but in the predominate social norms of the time. I was talking about the plain and simple fact that the intractable difference in the phrasing of the constitution and the foundation of these types of laws. Of course these laws exist, I already said that. What concerns me is the erosion of our base of freedom.
A man with a sign does nothing to impede movement on the sidewalks away way. This is a technicality, but a valid one. An ordinance that doesn't take that into consideration first thing sounds like a thing made to stop protests first, and keep the sidewalks clear second.



No, you are missing the point and in this rare circumstance, I agree with someone 100%. I know the example I am about to give will be extreme, however, even if extreme, by your reasoning, congress could make NO LAW every prohibiting it...

A man rapes a random woman/passerby because he wants to protest women's rights. Per the NO LAW, ever, clause you mention, this would be a lawful act. Even the laws on the books about rape could not prohibit this man from his wrong doing because, since he is protesting and using free speach, he is immune from prosecution.

Like I said, that example is extreme. However, the law, strictly read, is extreme as well. So there SHOULD be SOME leeway in there. You need a permit? The state cannot discriminate so apply for one and it will be granted. This does not, in anyway, stop a protest by a concerned, non-lazy citizen...

Also, who are these tards to ask for ID, say it is required, and not give their own info? Is it required? Because I don't think it is required of rent-a-cops or other private sectors... I know Florida's courtroom security is run by a private corporation...

>> ^brycewi19:

The man is a stand-up comedic genius.
And I don't throw that term around loosely.
Off the top of my head --> Bill Hicks, Andy Kaufman, Mitch Hedberg, Stephen Wright, Emo Phillips, and Dave Chappelle.


I don't know if I would throw Hedberg in with those guys. He was bombed out of his mind 99.999% of the time. I was at the State Theatre and watched that dude perform. A cup of vodka in one hand, a cup of orange juice in the other, his parents were in the audience and he kept forgetting his lines Couldn't come back on stage after someone heckled him. Funny guy but not a genius.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'dave, chappelle, man rape, houston, serial' to 'dave, chappelle, man rape, houston, serial, walk it off' - edited by calvados

Your video, Dave Chappelle on Man Rape., has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I mentioned it because he said he couldn't understand why the Japanese didn't want them there. I was there at the time, so I understood the local feeling, that's all. No other agenda behind my comment.

In reply to this comment by choggie:
The Japs using an isolated incident, to justify selfish desire....I'm sure no Japanese soldier ever raped anyone.... Chinese???


Poo poo on anyone bringing up similar incidents, on this post-a diversion at best, and a low-blow, out of context jab, ad nauseum. How did we get from the "everyday as a gunrock," to ISOLATED SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS B/T CIVS AND U.S. SOLDIERS??? Answer: Some folks who live in denial of the paradigm they find themselves in, use a universally acceptable example of man's inhumanity to man, (rape, in this case), in order to justify their idyllic, fantasies.

No different than Code Pink, and their tunnel-reality, bitter, spoiled-brat tactics.

Gunrock, yer head still shaped like a jar?? Don't ever soften up mate, get harder!!!

The Japs using an isolated incident, to justify selfish desire....I'm sure no Japanese soldier ever raped anyone.... Chinese???


Poo poo on anyone bringing up similar incidents, on this post-a diversion at best, and a low-blow, out of context jab, ad nauseum. How did we get from the "everyday as a gunrock," to ISOLATED SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS B/T CIVS AND U.S. SOLDIERS??? Answer: Some folks who live in denial of the paradigm they find themselves in, use a universally acceptable example of man's inhumanity to man, (rape, in this case), in order to justify their idyllic, fantasies.

No different than Code Pink, and their tunnel-reality, bitter, spoiled-brat tactics.

Gunrock, yer head still shaped like a jar?? Don't ever soften up mate, get harder!!!

Lots of man-rape on the sift lately.