>> ^shuac:

Hey, why doesn't the moon look any bigger?


Because it takes time for the cheese to expand after a lunar eclipse.

^ he's right on the money

it's the auspiciousness of the first fish of the lunar new year

at this time, most businesses in asian culture give out yearly bonuses* and as such people are generally flush with cash -- there's also a huge aspect of traditions which supposedly bring good fortune in the coming year, and likewise taboos to avoid

virtually everything costs more during this season: airline tickets almost double (if you can even get a seat); taxis add surcharges; most all hotels and restaurants are booked to capacity, etc

*to their asian employees (one of the few times it sucks to be a western 'barbarian' out here - typically no bonus, but you're stuck with the extra costs of the holiday)

I tried to fix your dead vid here http://videosift.com/video/Moon-Machines-Lunar-Rover-1-5 but I must not have done it correctly as only the 1st of the 5 vids in the playlist is showing.

The playlist is here if you can fix it. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL733ABB3D0581A951

Sorry!

And that is when we found oil on the moon, and the first lunar base was founded. I never asked myself did I mind if I worked making people down on the blue ball rich beyond comparison while I hacked out my life on a rock with no atmosphere. For I lived in a world where gravity wasn't so much a law, but a suggestion, a world unfiltered through the soup of my former pearls ozone layer. I was closer to the truth of were we came from, which I knew was way out there in the black somewhere; and I was closer than ever to touching it.

Scenes include (in order of appearance):

Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest
Mono Lake
Joshua Tree National Park
Alabama Hills
Lunar Eclipse of December 2010
Monument Valley
Salton Sea
Tuscon, Arizona
Jeju Island, South Korea
Yosemite National Park
Petrified Forest National Park
Death Valley National Park
Horseshoe Bend

I just want to see the Apollo lunar lander and flag. Zoom in on that!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'lunar eclipse, june 15, 2012, 100 minutes, red moon' to 'lunar eclipse, june 15, 2011, 100 minutes, red moon' - edited by berticus

>> ^KnivesOut:

Pfft, god scoffs at peer review.
Also, fossil hat lol.>> ^westy:
The age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Can you show me scientific , peer reviewed paper or study that invalidates all the methods used that currently point to the age of the earth being well over 6k years old ?
Also there is no way to know that the bible is the word of god or not just something made up by man.



"This quick-forming 'stone' hat adds weight to the claims that creation scientists are correct when they say that thousands or millions of years are not needed to form rocks and fossilize animals and plants."

LOL thats so mental I like how it omits the fact that you can tell by the location of items if it was formed in this specific process , and that calcification is decernably different from focalization.

I don't get how stupid can survive for so long and keeps going on you would hope that stupid ideas / stupid things would die out over time.

Pfft, god scoffs at peer review.

Also, fossil hat lol.>> ^westy:
The age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Can you show me scientific , peer reviewed paper or study that invalidates all the methods used that currently point to the age of the earth being well over 6k years old ?
Also there is no way to know that the bible is the word of god or not just something made up by man.

>> ^shinyblurry:

Yes, 6000 years. Don't take my word for it..look up the artifacts he mentions. The bible says that before the flood humans were quite advanced..and this is evidence for it. Can our understanding of history account for ancient batteries that generate electricity? How about a computer that can do addition subtraction multiplication and division? Models of modern airplanes? Heiroglyphics of helicopters? Obviously we have it wrong if any of those things existed. Wake up, you're being lied to.
>> ^kulpims:
shiny, you christians are total idiots. you advocate that the Earth, universe, everything is like, what - 6000 years old? and now you come up with this bullshit ...



The age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Can you show me scientific , peer reviewed paper or study that invalidates all the methods used that currently point to the age of the earth being well over 6k years old ?

Don't u think that the whole universe is under 6 k years old as well ?

Also there is no way to know that the bible is the word of god or not just something made up by man. So you are basing your whole motivation and argument of a book that contains fictional stories , incosistancies , has been edited over the years , no real direction as to what is Allegory or what is meant to be read as factual / literal.

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html

Just in case you don't know , you realize there is nothing stopping creationists gathering actual evidence and putting together scientific theories that are better than the current ones and as a result proving that the earth is 6k years old if it in fact was ?

That looked like a Lunar Teabag to me.

@Sagemind Sorry, but you haven't given me anything to disprove there. The first site trots out the usual utter, complete bullshit
"Images show that Stars were missing from the black lunar sky " Really? People don't know about exposures? You try taking a photo of people at night and see how many stars you see in the sky... fricken NONE.
"American Flag was waving - how is this possible when there is no air on the moon" IT WAS NOT WAVING... it moves when the astronaut puts it in, it has a ROD along the top of it to hold it out because it otherwise wouldn't flap out...

Actually, no, I'm not going to bother, they're all debunked many times over... places like Clavius and even Wikipedia has plenty of great debunking pieces.

It's utter rubbish, really, spend your time focusing on things that matter. You're being duped by a form of persuasion which I see these conspiracy shows employ which is to just fire lots of 'facts' at you so even if you can, on your own, debunk some of them straight away in your head using sound reason, you can't do that for all of them so you start to believe them because you can't instantly discredit them.

Well, if you need convincing, go to those sites and look up the answers to any of the claims that you actually believe in. You'll find that they are patently stupid and simple minded in the end.

It shits me to tears that people waste vast amounts of energy making up this crap and not bothering to actually fact check at all. Because thing like 'not being able to see stars' is SO AMAZINGLY stupid that any list that has that should immediately be ignored in its entirety for not having an once of common sense in it.

"I've learned not to trust in belief based on something I've been told or what's in a book." So, really, what do you believe? You believe conspiracy nuts with no evidence to back up their case? Sorry, but you've fallen into this land where anyone of any import can't be trusted, and this somehow includes all scientists and anyone who does proper science, and yet somehow leaves armchair conspiracy theorists as being the arbiters of truth.

Such a wrong, wrong, wrong mindset to be in.

YES check the sources, YES ask what vested interest any source of information has on a slant, YES be critical. But don't fall into the black hole of trusting nothing except other conspiracy theorists. It makes no sense.

Your video, December 21, 2010 - Winter Solstice Lunar Eclipse, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

It's Claude Debussy's Nocturnes: Sirènes
*bravo

>> ^Bradaphraser:

I must know what this music is! It's dreamy!

Had a perfect view off my balcony. Was bad-ass. Doesn't witnessing a total lunar eclipse cure lycanthropy in some canons?