Your video, Rachel Maddow Reports on Jon Stewart/Jim Cramer Interview, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

thank you. My first 15 and first number 1 .

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
*doublepromote

^Stewart doesn't have to.

In speaking, Tucker essentially goes after himself. The way that he minces words, fabricates perspectives and throws so many fish that there's a sea of red herring swimming circles around his own insipid wit, he begs to be called out but often isn't because he mostly only keeps like company. Even if he isn't aware of it, he plays up to a republican base that is still upset that a man of the same race that worked their great grandaddy's cotton fields had, not only the audacity to run for president, but the audacity to win. The sad thing is that there are still people out there who will make the same kind of mistake that Jim Cramer did, by accepting the word of CEO's without fact checking, and accept the words that roll off of Tucker's lying tongue without a grain of salt, or attached polygraph.

I'm glad the Zurawik puts Tucker straight at the end of the clip though.

Did ANYONE else hear Jim Cramer mention an intent to "win the war on unemployment and foreclosures"?

War on Unemployment?
War on Foreclosures?

I'm guessing that those wars will be just as successful as:

War on Drugs
War on Terror
War on Poverty

I think we should all get ready for a WHOLE LOT MORE Unemployment and Foreclosures for a REALLY LONG TIME. We've just declared war against them.

>> ^Tyrsis:
I guess it's interesting that he nailed some guy that is involved in the financial industry, but come on, nail someone who's worth nailing. I guess it's a start though -- I hope he continues pushing the financial industry. Perhaps they'll send someone in who can actually debate properly



I think Jon makes it clear that Cramer just happened to be the guy that the media chose as being the symbol of the big irresponsible media that the Daily Show highlights. It IS unfortunate that Cramer is the poster child, as his show's toots and whistles almost lend themselves to caricature, and it is the people behind this that should need to explain themselves. Cramer is the one who takes it personally until Jon Stewart puts him back on message.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^cdominus:
^ I'm surprised this would surprise you.


I was surprised because Olbermann at least had been openly mocking Santelli and Cramer for a while, and Rachel had been at least mentioning the growing ire Stewart was directing at Cramer on her show as well.

Usually those two have license to say things the network is otherwise uncomfortable with, and they'd already been openly piling on mockery directed at their CNBC fellows. I guess I just expected more independence from them.

I am a little curious if that's just going to be the NBC family's response to what happened, to just pretend it didn't happen.

If I had their ear, I'd tell them that this was an opportunity for them to do some public self-reflection, and win back some of the credibility they've lost by letting their commentators talk about it freely.

It's not like that'd hurt their ratings.

>> ^messenger:
No. You should be glad Stewart is in comedy. He only has license to do this kind of show because he's a comedian. It's not an unfortunate coincidence. Do you really think there's nobody ? Of course, there are plenty TV personalities who are as intelligent, knowledgeable, and skillful at journalism as him, but they work for news organizations, and they'd lose their careers for doing an interview like that.
I'd trust someone who bills themselves as a comedian before I trusted someone who billed themselves as a reporter. We all should.
>> ^NetRunner:
Personally, I think this is one more moment where Jon Stewart proves that he's a better journalist than the so-called pros.
....
It's a shame he's so locked into the mode of comedy, I'd love to give him his own 24 hour news network to run, I think he'd destroy the others.


In fairness, a reporter who comes close to that Jeremy Paxman, he earned his nickname for a reason.

No. You should be glad Stewart is in comedy. He only has license to do this kind of show because he's a comedian. It's not an unfortunate coincidence. Do you really think there's nobody ? Of course, there are plenty TV personalities who are as intelligent, knowledgeable, and skillful at journalism as him, but they work for news organizations, and they'd lose their careers for doing an interview like that.

I'd trust someone who bills themselves as a comedian before I trusted someone who billed themselves as a reporter. We all should.

>> ^NetRunner:
Personally, I think this is one more moment where Jon Stewart proves that he's a better journalist than the so-called pros.
....

It's a shame he's so locked into the mode of comedy, I'd love to give him his own 24 hour news network to run, I think he'd destroy the others.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^dag:
In related news MSNBC was reportedly banned from covering the Cramer vs Stewart drama by its parent company.

That explains why Rachel Maddow's reporting of the interview seemed so odd, and why Olbermann failed to mention it at all, even though he'd made sure to mention Stewart's roast of Cramer in absentia during the days leading up to the interview.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^burdturgler:
Why did people vote for this complete bullshit title?


Watch a video and upvote it on its' merits? That's so Videosift 2006/7.

Just fix your embed with this:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=221516&title=jim-cramer-interview-outtake
then discard your pokemon vid to make room for the other two parts ..
2 - http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=221517&title=jim-cramer-interview-outtake
3 - http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=221518&title=jim-cramer-interview-outtake
and make a link in the summary of the first vid to the other two ..
capiche?


In reply to this comment by Kerotan:
http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-and-jim-cramer-the-extended-daily-show-interview/

the part one embed from there.

In reply to this comment by burdturgler:
whats the link you're getting the embed from?

In reply to this comment by Kerotan:
>> ^burdturgler:
I'm not sure what you mean .. what's the problem?


well when I try to replace the embed (of this dead video) from comedy central, videosift has a hissy fit.

http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-and-jim-cramer-the-extended-daily-show-interview/

the part one embed from there.

In reply to this comment by burdturgler:
whats the link you're getting the embed from?

In reply to this comment by Kerotan:
>> ^burdturgler:
I'm not sure what you mean .. what's the problem?


well when I try to replace the embed (of this dead video) from comedy central, videosift has a hissy fit.