Howard Stern had a (nsfw, natch) bit on this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qty2-KnC8W0&feature=related

*length=2:15

Original title:
Jewess Chelsea Handler Does Howard Stern Type Libertine National TV Sex Skit With Her Staff see text

The fix is the same embed, they've just updated their codes.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'star trek, oh my, takei, howard stern, internment camps' to 'star trek, oh my, takei, howard stern, internment camps, thrash lab' - edited by messenger

I love the shoutout to Howard Stern.

I love the shoutout to Howard Stern.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Unknown, howard stern, never heard of this guy, not bad' to 'Unknown, howard stern, never heard of this guy, not bad, so mister mister please' - edited by calvados

I listened to Howard Stern on my way to... elementary.

>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^bareboards2:
Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?
I think what doogle was trying to say is this website is not audiosift. It used to be the general consensus, I think, that things which were not videos (eg: audio only or slideshows) do not belong on videosift.


Generally people say " WHAT IS THIS AUDIOSIFT ? " But I think you are spot on. This definitely belongs in Soundsift.

Well, then, he doesn't have to click on it.

The channel is clearly noted. Some of us like these audio dealies, some don't.

Ain't nobody here King of Nuthin'. We all have our own ideas, right?

Operative words in your kind explanation are "it used to be." Right?

Thanks for the explanation. I was befuzzled.


>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^bareboards2:
Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?
I think what doogle was trying to say is this website is not audiosift. It used to be the general consensus, I think, that things which were not videos (eg: audio only or slideshows) do not belong on videosift.

>> ^bareboards2:

Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?

I think what doogle was trying to say is this website is not audiosift. It used to be the general consensus, I think, that things which were not videos (eg: audio only or slideshows) do not belong on videosift.

"A place for all the Audio only embeds placed on Videosift.

If there is no video but audio, chances are it belongs here. Suggested uses :

-Music
-speeches
-Comedy/Stand up routines


This is not a place for sound bites such as Homer Simpsons "Whoo hoo " or Barney's Burping. The Audio must have substance."

Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?


>> ^doogle:

Not AudioSift.

>> ^Hanover_Phist:

When did Stern stop being an asshole? Hmmm.


I know, right...

Not that I disagree with a word he said there but srsly, he's really breaking the shock jock image.

Thanks.

This whole topic saddens me. There is so much crap in the world. And so much of it is avoidable. Life is hard, we don't need to make it harder.

I posted this on Facebook where my Mormon relatives could see it. I doubt they will read it. THEY don't bully, THEY don't "hate." It's just what God wants.

Fucking bullshit fuckhead stupidity.

In reply to this comment by longde:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/one-towns-war-on-gay-te
ens-20120202

Thanks clownboy!


In reply to this comment by Fletch:
*promote

quantummushroom: the only way I can make sense of your definition of freedom is that either you are in the top 1% capitalist class or are completely ignorant of the history of labor and rise of the middle class in America.

This may come as a shock, but you don't have to be in the 1% to be happy or free. Very few of those 1% are inheritors of wealth, they earned it, and the wealth was a byproduct of providing some useful goods or service people wanted. If you're getting your history of these United States from Howard Zinn or lamestream media, yeah, ignorance could be your secret admirer as well.


A third possibility is that you are just duped by Fox News I suppose.

I never watch it. I suspect more liberals watch it than conservatives, for the same reason people who hate Howard Stern listen to him: to see what he says next.

What exactly is a 'liberal scheme" anyway? Can you point to some concrete examples? The labor movement? Affirmative Action? Social Security? Medicare? Do these qualify as schemes?

The labor movement served a valid purpose until it didn't. And no government employee should be in a union. Ever. A scheme is a questionable idea which has revealed itself as existing mostly its own sake, usually by fraud and incompetence. Affirmative action is an insult to minorities. Medicare might have some merit, but the 60 billion dollars it loses to fraud EVERY year makes one question whether it really exists mainly to help people or aw away for government to take over the medical field.

King Obama has ALREADY spent over a trillion in "stimulus". Result: jack squat. Government spending has never been, nor will ever be, the solution.
















>> ^petpeeved:

quantummushroom: the only way I can make sense of your definition of freedom is that either you are in the top 1% capitalist class or are completely ignorant of the history of labor and rise of the middle class in America.
A third possibility is that you are just duped by Fox News I suppose.
What exactly is a 'liberal scheme" anyway? Can you point to some concrete examples? The labor movement? Affirmative Action? Social Security? Medicare? Do these qualify as schemes?