Putting, subject matter of this video aside, I had a HUGE problem with the lack of respect both hosts Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez was showing their guests, Young and his wife by not addressing them after they spoke and cutting them off.
Gonzalez, I believe rudely, would simply address Donahue after Young would speak, without even a recognition of the words he just spoke, let alone a follow-up question.
And Goodman straight up cut off Young's wife during the interview.
Even as a liberal myself, I can start to understand the conservative's argument that liberals are agenda driven.
Compassion for Mr. Young was not very present with these two hosts, just the agenda to stop the war. That bothered me, because both could have been accomplished.

Holy crap, was that Saul Goodman..??

No shit!-There's gotta be at least 10 examples of Dawkins arguing the case for his camp with non-non-believers here on the sift-Goddamn, Amy Goodman!!...Please do something with that mop of starving peasant hairdo you rock like you never cared...Jeeeez!..and maybe a sprinkle of cosmetics and better posture?? She has that, "Slept in My Clothes" look goin' alla time too, innit??!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'I Did not Fuck It UpKatie Goodman, Broad Comedy, live' to 'I Did not Fuck It Up, Katie Goodman, Broad Comedy, live, acoustic, music, fuck it up' - edited by lucky760

Nandos muthafuckas!

Those people fucking pwn chickens.

On the other hand, I will go to KFC just because I'm afraid of John Goodman. Seriously, I don't even know why I'm scared, but damnit, I am.

>> ^brunopuntzjones:

>> ^Darkhand:
1:55 Jesus Fucking Christ John Goodman can be fucking terrifying.
Has he ever played a Villain before? If not he NEEDS to.

In Barton Fink and The Big Easy


I WILL SHOW YOU THE LIFE OF THE MIND!

If the bigwigs ever decided to make another Dukes of Hazzard movie, they need Goodman to play the Boss.

>> ^Darkhand:

1:55 Jesus Fucking Christ John Goodman can be fucking terrifying.
Has he ever played a Villain before? If not he NEEDS to.


In Barton Fink and The Big Easy

>> ^Darkhand:

1:55 Jesus Fucking Christ John Goodman can be fucking terrifying.
Has he ever played a Villain before? If not he NEEDS to.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDd_ryixqyA

1:55 Jesus Fucking Christ John Goodman can be fucking terrifying.

Has he ever played a Villain before? If not he NEEDS to.

For actual informative coverage of the pepper spray debacle check out the interview Amy Goodman does with Kamran Loghman, the person who actually invented pepper spray and created the guidelines for its use.

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/11/29/pepper_spray_creator_decries_use_of

sorry ghark,
but it is a dupe:
http://videosift.com/video/Amy-Goodman-Chris-Hedges-Occupy-Movements

>> ^geo321:

Thanks ghark!
I think you might like this...
Chris Hedges & Amy Goodman on Charlie Rose on OWS (October 24, 2011)
http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/11961#http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hulu.com%2Ffeed%2Fsearch%3Fquery%3Damy%2Bgoodman%26sort_by%3Drelevance%26st%3D0

If you sift it I'll promote it...
yt part one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACVHfGdR1c8
yt part two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXvijFSI_a0
or
yt part one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJHuZNi7oyQ
yt part two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJSQ2baIGRE
In reply to this comment by ghark:
great find Geo321!



Oooh I watched those the other day, really good talk, I assumed it would already be sifted - I just sifted them now, very generous of you!

@A10anis

Agnosticism is an epistemological position of the uncertainty of knowledge of things. In other words, the nature of knowledge about God, or knowledge in general really, as many above have pointed out (I'm taking it you did read the nice chart above!). Theism or Atheism is a position, either knowingly or unknowing rejecting or accepting the idea of God; one can be explicitly or implicitly atheist (like all children not exposed to the idea are implicitly atheist). Agnostic Atheist is the most common position, but few people have complete understanding of all the concepts involved, or have their own private understandings of what they mean; making any unilateral criticism troublesome. As to the foundations of science and Mathematics, Kurt Gödel had had a great role to play in the destruction of what most peoples concept of certain systems are. And the o so smart Karl Popper ideas on falsifiability has thrown the antique notion of certain truth from science against the wall, in which modern Philosophers of Science, like Hilary Putnam have found intractable to solve, except to say that very little separates, currently, the foundations of science form the foundations of any other dabble of the imagination. Einstein talked about this as well, that wonderment is really the pursuit of all great scientists...not certainty.

As to my original claim, that science has truths it can not rectify, I leave it to better minds to explain the problems of induction. David Hume, Nelson Goodman, and Kurt Gödel drastically changed any view of certain knowledge from science and maths that I had. The untenable nature of the empirical evaluation of reality is just as uncertain as Abrahamic codifications being real.

I close with this, some of the greatest minds in the history of science and philosophy had no problem, nay, drew power from the deep richness they gathered from their faith. It drove them to the limits of the thoughts of their day, René Descartes, Gottfried Leibniz, Blaise Pascal, Alan Turing (who kept some vestibules of faith even after what happened to him), Georg Cantor, and countless others all had some "irrational" faith was more than just a ideal system of commands by some dead people, it drove them to greatness, and in many cases to rejection and madness of their "rational" peers. Georg Cantor, the father of the REAL infinite, died in a mental institution only to have his ideas lite a fire in the minds of the next generation of mathematicians.

It is my believe that we all want to have issue with x number of people, and make peace with y number. We elevate the slightest difference, or conversely, ignore a great flaw to peg this mark just right for us. Perhaps my y is just bigger than your x, or most peoples x as I find this debate I have is a common one; for tolerance, peace, and consideration. If you still think what I am saying is non-sense, then I guess we have nothing more to say to one another. I hope I cleared up my thoughts a bit more, I am not very good at communicating things that are more than just the average amount of esoteric.