You're not speaking for somebody else so much as your hubby is. Don't get sassy now...there are dipshits out there that don't like when you use the term "dipshit" in a derogatory manner. Also people that speak gibberish don't like when you talk about people not making sense as if it were a bad thing. Shame shame>> ^Issykitty:

I was speaking for myself out of anger,@rottenseed you dipshit. Who else am I speaking for??? You don't even make any fucking sense.
"So we've got false cause, and good ol' fashioned "eye-for-an-eye". A human can't even take his own life without people flinging shit in his name before he's 6 feet under. I have a suggestion: stop talking for others. Especially for groups you're not a part of. You're not even fucking gay...oops, I mean homosexual...oh wait, I wasn't using it in a derogatory manner...but I did say "fucking" before "gay"...oh wait WHAT I HAVE TO SAY HAS NO BEARING OVER A SOMEBODY FILLED WITH HATE AND IGNORANCE! Because to somebody like that, I "ain't nothin but no queer lover" anyway."

Tags for this video have been changed from 'futurama, professor farnsworth' to 'futurama, professor farnsworth, crazy gibberish' - edited by calvados

It's not hard. Just speak gibberish, and end yelling, "BORK BORK BORK!" and throw some cooking utensils in random directions.

>> ^TheGenk:

>> ^Yogi:
>> ^DerHasisttot:
>> ^Yogi:
Germany seems like a nice place to live.

It's no Sweden, but it's okay.

Eh Sweden is full of beautiful blonde women...who'd wanna go there?

Me, as soon as I get around to freshing up my swedish again

Dude, I'm not the victim, I couldn't care less if you call me a communist. From you, it doesn't mean anything since 99% of everyone is left of you. Therefore, you think everyone is a communist. That explains most of your gibberish posts.

Pretty much how Lewis Black describes Glenn Beck playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, except there's only one degree, and Kevin Bacon is a COMMIE!

I guess I need something that doesn't make any sense to end this post now, but it needs to be in all caps, because that makes it more emphatic...

MY ANACONDA DON'T WANT NONE UNLESS YOU GOT BUNS, HON!

*shrug*

>> ^quantumushroom:

Quit acting like a victim, it's unbecoming, especially since you're casting stones.
YOU DON'T START NONE THERE WON'T BE NONE.
>> ^heropsycho:
I knew it was only a matter of time before you'd call me a socialist. That of course makes me a communist, since socialism and communism according to you are the same thing. ROFL...
So in short, everyone even remotely to the left of qm is a communist apparently.
>>

I knew it was only a matter of time before you'd call me a socialist. That of course makes me a communist, since socialism and communism according to you are the same thing. ROFL...

So in short, everyone even remotely to the left of qm is a communist apparently.

>> ^quantumushroom:

I like how herobozo can praise a billionaire like Warren Buffoon. What a refreshing change!
Had Buffoon said any other thing than his current socialist gibberish, hero and friends would demand Buffoon be hung from a lamppost just like all the other evil billionaires. (Yeah, I can link too)

>> ^heropsycho:
I like how qm called Buffet a baffoon. Spot on. It would be different if Buffet were like some economic, investing super-genius. Like he's the most successful investor in the US, psssshhh...
http://verydemotivational.files.wordpres
s.com/2011/03/demotivational-posters-cant-tell-if-trolling.jpg

I like how herobozo can praise a billionaire like Warren Buffoon. What a refreshing change!

Had Buffoon said any other thing than his current socialist gibberish, hero and friends would demand Buffoon be hung from a lamppost just like all the other evil billionaires. (Yeah, I can link too)


>> ^heropsycho:

I like how qm called Buffet a baffoon. Spot on. It would be different if Buffet were like some economic, investing super-genius. Like he's the most successful investor in the US, psssshhh...
http://verydemotivational.files.wordpres
s.com/2011/03/demotivational-posters-cant-tell-if-trolling.jpg

I was catching on what he said at first, but then it all became gibberish...

>> ^shinyblurry:

It has every bearing on his life, because that is his lot. His only purpose, and his only hope, is to do a good job and earn his reward. He was not born into authority himself, nor does he know anything about running a Kingdom. He will never be able to earn anything greater for himself, and he is only well suited for the task at hand.
>> ^jonny:
It is not at all "plain there is a King." A simple person may assume that he exists by faulty inference. A more thoughtful person, though, will realize that the actual existence of the king is irrelevant to his or her own life. What is directly observable in this situation is that there is a social and cultural power structure in place which forces conformity upon the peasants through "displays of authority", presumably enforced by the soldiers. The peasant may choose to believe in the existence of the king or not, but it will have no bearing upon the peasant's life.
>> ^shinyblurry:
Lets say there was a certain King, whom you had never seen..and you are one of his peasants. You're under his authority and expected to work for him in the fields for a wage, and that when you are of the age of retirement, he will give you a home on his land and thank you personally. You see soldiers of his, marching through the town. You hear people talking about his attributes, his justness and intelligence. You witness his authority displayed all around you. It is plain there is a King though you had never seen him.

You have only asserted that it has bearing on his life (through mostly rhetorical gibberish). Your initial description of the peasant's life stated that the peasant will receive a reward upon retirement if the peasant accepts the king's authority and works in the fields. A peasant may do both of those and never consider the actual existence of the king, or if he does consider it, may reject it but still obey the directly observable authority of the society in which he lives. Is the peasant still entitled to his reward? If the reward is, in fact, contingent upon the peasant truly believing in the existence of the king, how will the king go about verifying that? Does this king have magical powers of ESP? And even if he does, how could the peasant possibly know that unless the king himself demonstrated it to him in person? Should he rely on the testimony of other peasants who are no better equipped to verify the existence of the king? Why not rely on his own abilities of observation and reason?

That takes me back 30 years to 1981 and my Math 103 class at the community college. I understood it then, it's just gibberish to me now.

>> ^AdrianBlack:

I was the "noob" that isduped a second time, and started this.

In truth, you tried but didn't end up having anything to do with the dupe processing of bareboards2's video. @therealblankman was the one who ultimately *isduped it.

Also, bareboards2's sift didn't start this discussion. In fact, this post had nothing to do with ambiguity or disagreement in the definition of a dupe until boneremake's comment about "criteria".

I'm sure he will take offense at this comment and leave me another pseudo-insulting gibberish PM.

[redacted]

lol, gibberish can be in any language

In Farsi and Arabic writing, using the proper letter case is the rule. So if they wanted to use those letters it should be:
قدنف

It is like writing english in script font, but in all caps. Since the HOTEL was in all caps, the artist used all caps for Arabic sign, thinking that it should make sense, but it doesn't.

But who cares, the game looks awesome ...

>> ^Mcboinkens:

>> ^theali:
@ 0:23 the hotel name is complete gibberish, couldn't they get someone to proof read this!

Uh...what? You realize the text above "HOTEL" is not in English right?

[redacted]

@ 0:23 the hotel name is complete gibberish, couldn't they get someone to proof read this!

Hang on. Did the host say that the correct answer (question?) was, "What is he's missing a leg?"

Surely that's just as much gibberish as the answer Watson gave.