Increase breast size! Zoom away from the unsightly wrinkles! Enchance!

It hasn't been much of a show since Jim Bakker. Whenever they left using one's imagination for computer enchanced effects, the whole idea of Dr. Who was violated and demeaned. The whole point of using a barrel with a plumber's helper, and all that, was to engage the viewer's imagination; not the pablum and puerility of today's so-called "Dr. Who".

...A modification of the Y chromosome, you say?


Whoa, i wonder how many sharks that genetic enchancement lets you jump over.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'fog, enchanced, music, san francisco, twin peaks' to 'fog, enchanced, music, san francisco, twin peaks, time lapse, timelapse, HDR' - edited by cybrbeast

>> ^dag:
Wow. Vajazzled. Probably a word that I didn't need to know.
In the "rise and fall of western civilization" - we're on the fall side.


Clearly you don't understand what civilization is for. Back in the day, beautiful women that wanted to enchance their looks had to slave for hours to heat buckets of water on wooden stoves just to wash their hair.

Now they can bejewel their vaginas. It's a golden age, I'm telling you.

My only question is why the paparazzi have failed to bring us photographic evidence to support her story.

ENCHANCE? part?

I had to wait two whole weeks to see this as well, but I finally got to see it on Sunday in IMAX 3D.

I hate to say it, I actually laughed out loud at the "ENCHANCE!" part because I thought it (in the movie) was so out of place making myself seem completely stupid out of a packed theater. Well maybe I can give it a break since the movie does take place in 2154 after all.

Either way, it kicked ass. No need for details, it had me within the first 30 seconds and the awesome opening shot that reminded me of what real sci-fi was about.

>> ^Farhad2000:
They will extract that and create the newest world food taste enchancer! Weeks old fruit tastes sweet again!
/Cynic


Read the article, they tried!

They will extract that and create the newest world food taste enchancer! Weeks old fruit tastes sweet again!

/Cynic

we've already been over why your post got discarded so I am going to spend very little time on it as I tire of going round and round with you about it....

So all I have to say further on the matter is that I think it would not have mattered if there was more discussion on the matter... an admin chose to enforce the rules, the vid was a blatant duplicate and that is that, end of story. Besides, I think there was plenty of material there already for lucky to make an informed decision, I really think you need to accept it and move on.

More important to our conversation, and this is the part I hope you LISTEN to and take to heart: Your arguments over the post and your newfound obession with *quality do not hold much weight with other sifters because of both your attitude and you modus operandi. For instance, when you say things like the following:

"sometimes i give very little weight to what somebody says, but i do that only when i have a reason to think their opinions are worthless"

"if sifters want a worst sift, i'm not the one martyr trying to keep them from harming themselves"

and there are many more I'm too busy at the moment to hunt down... but the point is, when you enter into an argument here you more often than not sound like a GIANT DOUCHE and you shouldn't be surprised when people respond to you in kind... probably more than a few sifters here would like to reach through the series of tubes seperating you from them and throttle you, I have certainly felt that urge on more than one occasion.

You need to accept that you are not "all that we ask of a God and more" (I think that was how your profile used to go), and therefore, nobody here is going to feel inclined to treat you with any measure of respect until you earn it.

Also, and I find this perhaps the most disturbing part of how you handled the soccer-post debacle... you were basically blackmailing ockhamist to change the embed code on his post. By saying, do this and I will do this, and pretty much holding that over his head, is, by definition, blackmail, and I have to say right now, if I ever catch you trying to do this again, I will take it up with the admins... you have to learn to play nice looris.

In addition to this, I've noticed that you've changed your profile to reflect some newfound values:

No TITLES missing VITAL info (same for the tags)
No screwed ASPECT RATIO
No SLOW MOTION where not needed
No lame INTROS or outros
No COMPILATIONS
No pointless SOUNDTRACKS

This is great, I'm all for sift quality, but let me just tell you now, that if you start going about downvoting everything that does not meet the looris stamp of approval you are only going to make more enemies, so therefore, I don't recommend it. Some people like slo-mo, and some people like compilations- especially when they enchance the content of a collective. I think you need to accept that stuff will always be posted to the sift that you personally do not like, that is how it is. If you are not cool with that then I suggest you just leave and start your own 'looris-approved' vid-blog.

Really, downvoting to bolster your own agenda does nothing to enhance the sift... just think about it, if everyone who hated family guy (and there are many of us) did this, just how many vids do you think you would have published? You've got a gold star now, play with your new powers and your collective and be happy. Enhance the sift by posting good quality vids and maintaining a successful collective, but don't do it by bumming things out for others... everybody wants a gold star, and more, don't piss on their dreams just because you happen to dislike slo-mo... Or rather, as a compromise, if you still feel you have to downvote if only to make the statement that "I looris, am not down with the slo-mo" make it after the vid is published, that way nobody gets upset... for the most part, this is what ant does, and we've all come to just accept him for it.