Gay people are not asking to push their way of thinking on the American culture. They just want equal rights and freedom from oppression, just like everyone else does. Besides, they are a part of American culture (and part of all other cultures, too).

They most certainly are pushing their way of thinking on America, and that in every aspect of life. In California young children must now learn about gay history:

http://www.npr.org/2011/07/22/138504488/california-brings-gay-history-into-the-classroom

The normalization of homosexuality is also leading to the normalization of transgenders. There is now a law in California which states that transgenders have a protected right of gender expression which means they have to be allowed to cross dress at work:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/10/california-transgender-laws_n_1004109.html

Which leads to this:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=348033

Before you say it has nothing to do with gay rights, these were the sponsors:

The bill was authored by Assemblymember Toni Atkins (D-San Diego) and sponsored by Equality California, Transgender Law Center and Gay-Straight Alliance Network.

Here is the bill California vetoed but it shows the agenda:

Brown vetoed the Survey Data Inclusion Act, which required the state to include questions about LGBT identities, including sexual orientation and domestic partnership status among others, on state surveys.

The truth is, gays are pushing their lifestyle on this culture, and trying to gain a protected minority status. They won't stop until they are fully integrated into every aspect of our culture, including indoctrinating our children.

Your slippery-slope argument about homosexuality leading to "other kinds of deviant sexuality" is entirely unfounded and logically fallacious. If by "deviant sexuality" you mean things like fetishes and BDSM, then that's patently false, as plenty of kinky sex goes on in heterosexual relationships too, and if it were true, it would mean that all or most gays and lesbians would be into whips and chains, which they aren't. If by "deviant sexuality" you mean "child abuse", then you are conflating homosexuality with paedophilia, and you need to stop doing that now, because you know there is no causal relationship there.

I just demonstrated the causal relationship by my example. There are also many studies which state there is a connection:

From the Archives of Sexual Behavior:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archives_of_Sexual_Behavior

A study of 229 convicted child molesters published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that 'eighty-six percent of [sexual] offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.'

The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2.4% of men attracted to adults prefer men. In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles

"Pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association with two other statistically infrequent phenomena. The first of these is homosexuality ... Recent surveys estimate the prevalence of homosexuality, among men attracted to adults, in the neighborhood of 2%. In contrast, the prevalence of homosexuality among pedophiles may be as high as 30-40%."

A study in the Journal of Sex Research noted that '... the proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger than the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men ... the development of pedophilia is more closely linked with homosexuality than with heterosexuality

You claim you care about homosexuals. Well, I don't see it. Condemnation masquerading as love isn't caring, it's just the usual passive-aggressive Christian bullshit. Someone who cares about homosexuals would want to allow them to marry, to adopt children, and to live their lives without being bullied and persecuted.

To advocate for that would be to encourage homosexuals to continue breaking Gods law and end up in hell. I don't want homosexuals to go to hell, therefore I will continue to tell them it is immoral and that they need to repent.

Christians do not have a monopoly on morality; in fact, the Christian adherence to the bronze-age concept of sin and their preoccupation with what other people do in bed is positively immoral.

God decides what is moral, and it is the preoccuption of Christians to obey God and warn those who are perishing.

Who cares if something is against the "law" of some god or other? I don't believe in your god, and it probably doesn't even exist, so why should I care what people say it likes and dislikes? And why should religious people get special dispensation for their acts of hatred and bullying because you claim it is mandated by a magic invisible man who lives in the sky?

Regardless of whether you believe in God or not, you are still accountable to Him. And even if I wasn't Christian, I still have a right to say homosexuality is immoral. That is my right and is guaranteed by the constitution, just as it is your right to say what you like about my religion. You would like to have it one way and stifle my right to free speech, which is ironic considering the position you're taking about equal rights.

>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
Gay people are not asking to push their way of thinking on the American culture. They just want equal rights and freedom from oppression, just like everyone else does. Besides, they are a part of American culture (and part of all other cultures, too).
Your slippery-slope argument about homosexuality leading to "other kinds of deviant sexuality" is entirely unfounded and logically fallacious. If by "deviant sexuality" you mean things like fetishes and BDSM, then that's patently false, as plenty of kinky sex goes on in heterosexual relationships too, and if it were true, it would mean that all or most gays and lesbians would be into whips and chains, which they aren't. If by "deviant sexuality" you mean "child abuse", then you are conflating homosexuality with paedophilia, and you need to stop doing that now, because you know there is no causal relationship there.
You claim you care about homosexuals. Well, I don't see it. Condemnation masquerading as love isn't caring, it's just the usual passive-aggressive Christian bullshit. Someone who cares about homosexuals would want to allow them to marry, to adopt children, and to live their lives without being bullied and persecuted. Christians do not have a monopoly on morality; in fact, the Christian adherence to the bronze-age concept of sin and their preoccupation with what other people do in bed is positively immoral. Who cares if something is against the "law" of some god or other? I don't believe in your god, and it probably doesn't even exist, so why should I care what people say it likes and dislikes? And why should religious people get special dispensation for their acts of hatred and bullying because you claim it is mandated by a magic invisible man who lives in the sky?
>> ^shinyblurry:
I'm not saying that homosexuals are the same as paedophiles. I am saying that the normalization of homosexuality into a culture is a logical pathway to the normalization of pederasty in a culture, which we have a historical example of in the greeks. I am also saying that it is deviant sexual behavior which opens the door to other kinds of deviant sexual behavior, and that in itself is eroding the moral fabric of this country.
It is exactly because I care about homosexuals that I will openly say it is immoral, and against Gods law. It would in fact be a sin if I didn't say it. Any law which restricts my, or anyone elses ability to say it is unconstitutional. The absurdity is inherent in the ultra politically correct environments this kind of thing always leads to, as marbles posted about.
There is nothing hateful in stating the truth. If homosexuals have the right to trumpet their way of thinking and push it on the American culture, I have the equal right to say it is wrong and something that should be avoided at all costs. It's always interesting that a moral relativist always allows for every kind of moral position except for the kind that takes an absolute position.
>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
How hypocritical of @shinyblurry to accuse someone else of having a "heart filled with poison". The ridiculous, hateful and archaic dogma of sin and judgement that you subscribe to is an immoral poison to the modern world, giving rise to absurd and damaging situations like the religious exception to this law.
Equating homosexuals with paedophiles is a cowardly trick of misdirection and a false analogy. They are not the same, and you know it - a consenting homosexual couple harms no-one at all, whereas a paedophile who molests a child causing emotional damage that ripples out into the child's later life and relationships. Your argument is empty.

There are two arguments Being made here.

1. The source of the video is from Asia.

:The video was made by a Japanese person with his/her own personal camera (according to the description of the original upload description), in their local habitat (possibly in Japan, judging from the Japanese TV show sounds at the end of the video).

vs

2. The content of the video has no relevance to Asian culture or environment.

:The image being shown on the video shows little to no representation of Asian culture. It may as well be a 40 year old cross-dressing clown's living room in middle of Indiana for all we know. There is barely any reference to Asian culture or of its characteristics except for the vague presence of Asian television in the background.

============================================================================

[The description of the *'Asia channel on VideoSift as of August/8/2011: "This channel is dedicated to the ancient cultures and traditions of Eastern Asia, particularly China and Japan, that began thousands of years ago and continue to this very day only slightly if at all affected by the modern world. It covers everything from period Shaolin martial arts videos in China to wacky reality Japanese shows of today."]


This is a video of a puppy being cute. I liked the video as a cute, catsanddogs video, that's why I upvoted it. There was some WTF-ness to the situation as well, but you're also stretching it a bit at this point. Putting this video in the Asia channel does not add anything to that channel's general content, because this video simply doesn't contain enough Asian characteristics.

In fact, this video is far more qualified to be in the 'music' channel than the Asia channel.

Few of my friends are in Burlesque. It's quite artistic, but I still can't help feeling uncomfortable watching my female friends get naked on a show stage. It's like watching your cross dressing brother all made up, and he actually LOOKS GOOD; a very awkward experience.

How is this anything like Sherlock Holmes?! What fucking detective work and observational analysis is being done amongst these explosions, gunshots, and cross dressing!??!

apparently he won every fight in that tournament in a KO, maybe there is a secret to that cross dressing that fuels his rage.

>> ^nach0s:
I have the first Vice Guide to Travel video, and while this clip seems to indicate higher quality, it still seems like some bored rich guys from the States going out thrill-seeking. There's some reportage going on for sure. They've gone to a pretty hellish place that most of the world has forgotten about. But a lot of this segment is the 'reporter' ineloquently commenting on how scared he is, or how fucked up this or that place is. Yea, it's fucked up, the images speak for themselves.


Bored rich guys going out thrill seeking generally make the best journalists. I don't really care how or why they got the footage, the fact is they got it and look to have reported it pretty much the way they saw it. When's the last time any major network covered something as important and ridiculously dangerous? Heck, honestly tell me you've heard from any other source that the UN intends to withdraw their force within a year and just hope the civil war doesn't start back up into another drug addicted cannibalistic child soldier hell on earth?

>> ^Matthu:
It truly makes you appreciate your, comparatively, extremely cushy lives.


Why, I don't know what you're talking about. I'm sitting here in my leather chair, eating pizza, watching the Olympics in HD on my 32 inch flatscreen, while cruising the internet on my $1500 dollar PC.

My life is FAR from cushy.

Your video, Warning: extremely graphic: "Vice Guide To Liberia", has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

You can see the full doc here
http://www.videosift.com/video/The-Cross-Dressing-Cannibals-of-Liberia

>> ^Kevlar:
Is it just me, or is the one on the left the spiritual successor to the Numa Numa guy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Brolsma


More like his cross-dressing older brother...

i saw something like this live. In my high school they had an odd form of cross-dressing day. I never understood it, but many of the students participated. One of the guys was wearing a dress and some of the other students were teasing him about it, so he attempted to kick them and the same thing happened to him. It was hilarious, but the guy was a psycho, so i did not laugh until i was well out of his sight.

The sole reason Chuck Norris quit cross dressing.

guyincognito,(obviously masturbating), try yahooanswers.com or askafucking inanemastubatoryquestion.com, to find yer answer (this is choggie trying to play cop and pretending to be a douche bag)....nah, man, does not ring any bells....post more videos maybe and get to know the regulars....like in any pub or brothel, keep yer jizz-space au privae.


Oh wait, It's that Estée Lauder commercial with the midgets and the cross-dressing Norsemen, ok.

sure takes all the work out of cross-dressing doesn't it? lazy Palestinian child.

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by Ornthoron.