Looks like something I'd really enjoy, but goodness gracious the title perturbs the heck out of me.

He's INSIDE the source code? SERIOUSLY?

Source code is just plain old text compiled into a executable program (or executed by an interpreter), not something that someone can be inside. Every time they say "You're IN the source code," I'm just picturing him in a pile of paper with programming language all over it or maybe like they shrunk him down and digitized him so he can walk around on a computer screen inside an editor like Notepad++ or an IDE like Eclipse.

Oh well. They title movies for the masses. This was my same issue with the new Karate Kid movie (which is about a boy learning Kung Fu). Crikey. That's Hollywood for you.

Thanks

I'd have no chance there.

In reply to this comment by heathen:
Crikey! Aint got much time, but had to point out the mistake in your description - it's "the bastard's gone dodgy" not "best it's" - you gotta know how to understand a deliberately mangled Aussie/Brit accent if you want to survive out here, mate.

Crikey! Aint got much time, but had to point out the mistake in your description - it's "the bastard's gone dodgy" not "best it's" - you gotta know how to understand a deliberately mangled Aussie/Brit accent if you want to survive out here, mate.

Crikey!²

Quite a bit of *eia going on there, too!

I spread the love.. hard and fast.

In reply to this comment by Hybrid:
Crikey, a quality and a doublepromote... you have far too many powerpoints to burn

Cheers!

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Nic Cage is great in this too. Everything in this movie makes me wanna *quality *doublepromote.

*nochannel *actionpack *cinema *dark *comedy

Crikey, a quality and a doublepromote... you have far too many powerpoints to burn

Cheers!

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Nic Cage is great in this too. Everything in this movie makes me wanna *quality *doublepromote.

*nochannel *actionpack *cinema *dark *comedy

CRIKEY, I've stuck my paw in his butthole and now he's REALLY PISSED AT ME!!!

Crikey, why is this video not up there? Amazing realtime effects. Caused Nvidia officials to cream themselves. The world is going to dung.

Crikey. I hope that building had been evacuated prior to the blast.

GeeSuss, did you just say Cricky?!?! Effin Cricky?? Seriously? Crick as in cricket?!? I only know of one definition for cricky.

Try Crikey.

Oh, and Kevlar, I choose all of the above except (C). I know if I'm downtown anywhere and there's a meter deep river goin down mainstreet I'm thinking (F)(T)(W).

>> ^spoco2:
ARGH!
Again with this bullshit..

NO, THEY ARE NOT BANNING SMALL BREASTS. Does no one actually go and check things anymore?
sigh .
Yes, Australia has some ridiculous censorship laws. YES, the attempt to install a mandatory internet filter is utter bullshit. YES we are denied R rated games.
BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE.
It hurts the real cases when this is spread around as if it's fact, because it isn't.
The ejaculation thing is true, which absolutely friggen baffles me... WHY?


It's not bullshit. The ban applies to any porn that subjectively appears to include people under 18, by the arbitrary opinion of the censor, rather than to subjects who are actually under age. So a small-breasted and young-looking 25-year old could be banned.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I have read it. I support the Anonymous action. The "banning small breasts" thing is actually, mostly true.

From the site that's linked from that Crikey link you posted Spoco:.

UPDATE 29/01/10 12:19PM: Fiona Patten has provided additional comment:

“I would like to clarify a few points. In the last 18 months the Classification Board has revoked over 30 serial classifications for a range of reasons, one major one being that the models appear to be under 18. These revoked classifications do not appear on the classification database.”
“Late last year I attended a classification publications training session with three adult magazine distributors and one publisher. We were shown a range of images and the notes made by the board were read out. The underdeveloped nature of the model’s breasts was cited as a reason for the image to be refused classification numerous times.“

“All the publications that have been refused classification adhere to the very strict US laws that enforce model age verification in adult publications and films. These laws are upheld by the FBI. There is no chance that any of the models were under 18.”

>> ^spoco2:
ARGH!
Again with this bullshit..

NO, THEY ARE NOT BANNING SMALL BREASTS. Does no one actually go and check things anymore?
sigh .
Yes, Australia has some ridiculous censorship laws. YES, the attempt to install a mandatory internet filter is utter bullshit. YES we are denied R rated games.
BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE.
It hurts the real cases when this is spread around as if it's fact, because it isn't.
The ejaculation thing is true, which absolutely friggen baffles me... WHY?

ARGH!

Again with this bullshit..


NO, THEY ARE NOT BANNING SMALL BREASTS. Does no one actually go and check things anymore?

*sigh*.

Yes, Australia has some ridiculous censorship laws. YES, the attempt to install a mandatory internet filter is utter bullshit. YES we are denied R rated games.

BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE.

It hurts the real cases when this is spread around as if it's fact, because it isn't.

The ejaculation thing is true, which absolutely friggen baffles me... WHY?

Just so it's listed here... it's false, it's not true

I wish I had watched this earlier, as people are not going to pay attention to this but... it's not really true (And crikey is a respected news source...)

So everyone calm down, it's crap.