i like ron paul.
we dated for a bit because we had so much in common in regards to civil liberties and a non-intervention foreign policy.
i had to dump him due to his free-market corporation obsession.
it had just turned creepy...
he still calls on my birthday though,very sweet.

the american people are against any military action.up to 80% of the population kind of against,but what have we learned over the past 10 yrs?
the american government ignores the population and relies on bobbleheads like blitzer and this other cunt to promote the propaganda.

"so let me just say,that after being briefed the gas attacks took place"
ok..im listening,please continue.
"and that the assad administration is responsible"
the assad situation is responsible?
really? are you sure? because as far as i can tell there is not one shred of evidence.
well,thats not quite true.isreali intelligence says the assad regime is responsible.
and if the isreali intelligence says its assad then it MUST be true right? they wouldnt,,you know..lie.

whoa whoa whoa mr quigley.
am i correct in assuming that your entire argument is basically "trust us"?

you sir,are a whore who would sell his integrity to the highest bidder.you have lost any right to speak on this situation or for any of your constituents to show you any form of respect.
i revoke your right to participate in human affairs and i bid you good day.

i said good day!

and look at our little slut blitzer trying to snipe from the bleachers.
oh blitz...
you sold your soul a looong time ago.
nobody listens to you anymore.
they are just transfixed by the beard.

to imply that military force is a righteous and just course of action due to 100,000 people dying ignores the fact that america has used chemical weapons.

so when THEY use chemical weapons it is a crime against humanity but when WE use them it is justified?
nice logic captain propaganda.

and if we are to take your argument to have any validity.then i am forced to ask this question:
"if the united states has the right to invade another country for crimes against humanity.that the invasion is for humanitarian reasons (as if bombing and killing is humanitarian),then explain to me why so many countries were NEVER invaded by the united states,even when THEIR crimes against humanity were far more egregious?"
see:rwanda
see:east timor
the list is NOT short.

cant answer?
then i submit that your argument is no argument at all.
because if you were a true journalist you would have asked "where is the diplomatic solution?"
"why are we we going in to drop a limited sorte of bombs?"
"in what reality could that produce positive results for the region?"
"where is the international political pressure to bring these factions to the negotiation table?"
"where is the evidence that assad's regime is responsible?"
"why is the obama administration ignoring the military commanders advice of non-intervention?"

i could do this all day.

there is a bright spot in this otherwise dreary and dystopian picture.
the american people are not as politically gullible as they were 10 yrs ago.
we SEE whats going on.
the world SEES whats going on.

welcome citizen to the united states of empire.
please have a seat.
be quiet and obey.
your government is in control.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 3 Badge!

>> ^westy:

I would rather a kid get all these questions wrong but understand the basics of scientific methadoligy , you can learn facts and history over time as you get older but if you dont understand critical thinking and scentific method then you will litraly fill your brain with shit and evan worse not know the shit from the non shit.


I'd wager that most of those people don't know the scientific method either.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^jmzero:

English is a language that is abused and changes over time that's why it has stayed around and why it will keep changing I don't see why people get so offended.

I wasn't offended, I was making a little joke (only partly at your expense). In the future, I think it'd probably be safe for you to assume that people responding to your posts are probably making fun of you.
Anyways, I accept that "literally" is sometimes used as a generic intensifier (usually by idiots) and certainly I understand what you were trying to say, but it's still funny to imagine a brain literally full of shit.


Most people take the piss out of me because I write like a retarded gibbon having a sesure on a keyboard I don't mind.

>> ^quantumushroom:

My love for (legal) teenaged girls has not diminished. I must update my van for this next generation.


Genuine LOL!

>> ^jmzero:

then you will litraly fill your brain with shit and evan worse not know the shit from the non shit

Yeah, I don't think I'd grade those problems the same way. If your brain is "litraly" filled with shit, that is almost certainly going to be your #1 problem.


Evan though you might not like it "Literally" is a word that can and often is used figuratively , The world "Literally" is not damaged by this as it is only ever used in a figurative sense in the context when it would be imposable for it to be taken Literally.

English is a language that is abused and changes over time that's why it has stayed around and why it will keep changing I don't see why people get so offended.

>> ^bmacs27:

My boss has been teaching the same class the same way at the college undergrad level for 25 years. The failure rate has gone from 5% to 25%. They're getting dumber.


SAT scores had to be re-normed to a lower level in the 90s because a larger portion of society was going to college.

The smart fraction is just as smart as they've always been, but they're a much smaller proportion of society now for various reasons.

Yeah they should have asked them to name 30 large corporations that have power over congress. >> ^westy:

I would rather a kid get all these questions wrong but understand the basics of scientific methadoligy , you can learn facts and history over time as you get older but if you dont understand critical thinking and scentific method then you will litraly fill your brain with shit and evan worse not know the shit from the non shit.

Your video, Teenagers Can't Answer Basic Trivia Questions, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

FIX IT WITH http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FD7BDP3XMG0


links dead.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Bush-cant-answer-question

links dead.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Bush-cant-answer-question