>> ^nomino:
I upvote anything Bobby McFerrin. He is amazing.
btw, this routine is not new. here's a video of the original
http://www.videosift.com/video/Bobby-McFerrin-improvises-with-audience

I upvote anything Bobby McFerrin. He is amazing.

btw, this routine is not new. here's a video of the original
http://www.videosift.com/video/Bobby-McFerrin-improvises-with-audience

Your video, Bobby McFerrin plays the audience as an instrument, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Thank you sir! This is my first *qualitied video.

In reply to this comment by maatc:
*quality clip! Thanks for that!

cheers ^____^

In reply to this comment by Haldaug:
*promote

Fixed! but with a slightly lower quality video... oh well

In reply to this comment by Haldaug:
*reclaimvote *dead

Here's a replacement, but it's audio only: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=by6PgJ8SqoE

Great! I like this version better than the one with Bobby McFerrin. It feels more pure, somehow.

In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Hey Ornthoron,

Finally found the right vid!

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

In reply to this comment by Ornthoron:
Hmmm, you seem to have posted the same video twice... That must surely be a mistake. But it's a great video!

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Bobby-McFerrin-and-Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

Hey Ornthoron,

Finally found the right vid!

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

In reply to this comment by Ornthoron:
Hmmm, you seem to have posted the same video twice... That must surely be a mistake. But it's a great video!

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Bobby-McFerrin-and-Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

Hey Ornthoron,

Thanks for the heads up! One of those videos is supposed to be JUST Richard Bona playing and singing but it looks like it was fixed with a different video than the original. It also happens to be the same video I posted earlier. I can see how that would happen when someone else fixed it since Richard Bona is in the other one too... Damn. Now I need to find a good video for that one, and if I recall it's going to be hard.

In reply to this comment by Ornthoron:
Hmmm, you seem to have posted the same video twice... That must surely be a mistake. But it's a great video!

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Bobby-McFerrin-and-Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

Hmmm, you seem to have posted the same video twice... That must surely be a mistake. But it's a great video!

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

http://jazz.videosift.com/video/Bobby-McFerrin-and-Richard-Bona-Dina-Lam

^exactly.
arrrgrggrhhgsghshgshgsghsfhgsdfhgsdkjfdshjlgdlkjfgdlzsjnfgsljihf

fucking retarded description.

about 5,000,000 kids can beatbox better than that anyway. heck, i can beatbox better than that myself.

and michael jackson is about 5% as talented as Bobby McFerrin.

and michael stole his shit from the street without giving credit for it.

but yes he has my sympathy because of the child abuse.

but... part of the child abuse was forcing him to practice being a performer 28 hours a day, and beating him if he fucked up, so it's not so surprising that he is "talented". You could use the word "trained" instead.

Nothing political. I just wanted to throw in a book review. I was only fooling. I think it's funny how crazy people are about that book (on both sides).


In reply to this comment by HaricotVert:
[EDIT] Oh, I get it now. The first video is some retarded internet user's redubbing of the original SIGGRAPH short (which did have the sound effects and McFerrin music, identical to the audio in the one you posted), and thus is still an incorrect titling and labeling, while the one you posted is the theatrical short that all the movie-going audiences saw.

By the way, you can keep your political commentary out of our conversation, since it is entirely unrelated to the reason I claimed dupe and downvoted. Thanks.

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
Whoopsie. Look before you leap.
That video has some lame dubbed music. This is the remastered copy with the original Bobby McFerrin.

Thanks anyway (for the downvote).


That other video that you linked to is kinda like Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States. Looks fine on the surface, but once you really dig in you find it's nothing more than a crock.

In reply to this comment by HaricotVert:
dupe: http://www.videosift.com/video/Pixar-Classic-Short

[EDIT] Oh, I get it now. The first video is some retarded internet user's redubbing of the original SIGGRAPH short (which did have the sound effects and McFerrin music, identical to the audio in the one you posted), and thus is still an incorrect titling and labeling, while the one you posted is the theatrical short that all the movie-going audiences saw.

By the way, you can keep your political commentary out of our conversation, since it is entirely unrelated to the reason I claimed dupe and downvoted. Thanks.

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
Whoopsie. Look before you leap.
That video has some lame dubbed music. This is the remastered copy with the original Bobby McFerrin.

Thanks anyway (for the downvote).


That other video that you linked to is kinda like Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States. Looks fine on the surface, but once you really dig in you find it's nothing more than a crock.

In reply to this comment by HaricotVert:
dupe: http://www.videosift.com/video/Pixar-Classic-Short

Not dupe. It's not just Bobby McFerrin; this one has sound effects as well, which contribute greatly to the video. I think it's valuable to have both versions on here, since it shows the process such a *shortfilm can go before coming to the big screen. If you want good sound you can watch this one, and if you want animated boobs you can see the other one. Everybody wins.

*return

*discuss because I've been wrong about dupes before.

"Minor changes in content, like a few additional insignificant seconds of video or alternate background music, will still be considered dupes. The only exception to this is if the change in audio makes a significant difference to the video content."

I think the audio changes the video significantly. I mean, c'mon! It's Bobby McFerrin.