You know, from the thumbnail I thought this might be arousing.

It was not.

Nicely made video, but also off the track.

Equating not using swear words all the time with not telling your kids where babies come from is not right. I prefer my kids to not use swear words because there's a time and a place for them, and an age. A kid saying 'fuck you man' is not funny, not cute, just seems wrong. A kid finding out that babies come from vaginas is cool, is right, is the way to go. A kid being shown graphic sex on the other hand 'Look son, this is how you get a woman pregnant' is not right.

Censorship (in theory) is there to protect those who aren't mature enough to handle the content, to contextualise it, to know real from make believe.

Censorship of violence and swearing vs sex is pretty fucked up these days. A youtube video can have the most violent of death scenes and someone swearing black and blue, but show a bit of sex and 'WOAH THERE TIGER, WHAT ARE YOU DOING?'

So yeah, I agree with him on that point.

But then he misses the point as to why breasts are covered up while man boobs are allowed... people aren't aroused by man boobs (ok, maybe some are), but breasts arouse a pretty damn large proportion of the male (and some female) population.

Not well thought out, not looking at it at all deeply at all.

If swear words weren't considered rude, and were just used all the time, then they'd lose their impact... so then people would just come up with other words to take their place that DO have impact.

The fight over swearing vs violence vs nudity is a valid discussion (can you believe that Chuck dickwad Norris made them keep the swearing down in The Expendables 2 so it could get a lower rating... you know, so the kids could still see all the mindless killing... awesome idea). Violence is allowed too much over nudity/sex. They come from a good place, violence does not.

Eh, I've rambled too much again. But basically. He got it wrong.

>> ^jimnms:

I never understood why a man would want to have anal sex with a woman. We (men) sometimes use the phrase "tap that ass" or "get a piece of that ass" when we're with other guys and see a hot chick, but (at least I don't) don't mean it literally.


Well, that's good for you I guess, but for a lot of us it's got a certain taboo quality to it which makes it very hot. For me it's about the woman being so turned on she wants to do it, to totally give in to something like that. That's what's hot about it to me.

As for the actual feeling of it. For me, not really a great deal different to vaginal sex, so that's not the attraction. There are guys who say that it's awesome because of how tight it is in comparison, but eh, no big difference in that regards to me.

I'd never want to force a woman into it at all, because that would entirely remove the turn on. The turn on is that they are so aroused, they want to do something 'dirty', that it's a different feeling. So if they're only doing it because you are badgering them into it, the enjoyment is gone.

Lil' kitteh plum tuckered itself out trying to arouse slumbering beauty [that must have been some nip, I mean nap!] =o)

I'm going to *promote this, as it really is as important that men do this as women do breast exams.

That, and I like how they did not show that guy's penis after she handled him, I suspect he was not flaccid... I know I'd find it damn hard (tee hee) to stay un-aroused with her doing that, especially dressed like that.

>> ^Trancecoach:

heart rate does not necessarily mean attraction/arousal. It could mean, these stimulants are kicking in, or this dance club is really bumping, or that was a long flight of stairs


Wrong. Only arousal. That's how gyms work. Gay men gather and stare at other gay men in tight, sweaty spandex. Then they lose weight.

heart rate does not necessarily mean attraction/arousal. It could mean, these stimulants are kicking in, or this dance club is really bumping, or that was a long flight of stairs

I become aroused when the dress is transparent.

Your video, Dress Becomes Transparent When Aroused, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

http://i.imgur.com/Cmq0x.gif
>> ^Stingray:

"...but become see-through as the heart rate of the person wearing the dress increases."
Wow... imagine if they made yoga pants out of this.

Yes.. imagine.
>> ^Hybrid:

Imagine walking into a bar and all the girl's dresses go completely opaque.
Forever alone.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 9 Badge!

They are much more likely to be pissed off than aroused, but both states cause an increased heart rate -- it's a win either way.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Thanks for reaching out like this - I have to say I'm kind of intrigued. One way to prove identity would be to have these people make a short video wherein they address us directly. Although, it could be BlankFist in Mrs. Doubtfire makeup.>> ^Boise_Lib:

My correspondence with @silverpoint16 via Youtube.
Posted with permission.

I am not a sockpuppet
I think I begin to understand why you where checking up on me yesterday. I am communicating with you via YT to ask your advice on how to proceed because you contacted me yesterday.
The accounts in question are not sock puppet accounts. We are innocent of the charges and we are five real people.
Here's the backstory. It is not coincide that all accounts were opened within a short period of time. The 5 of us became friends on YouTube because we admired the videos each other has created. Most of them are cat channels. When one of us discovered Videosift and liked what we saw, we shared it with the others and all of us decided to set up accounts.
We are an enthusiasic, friendly and supportive group of people on YouTube and we have taken that behaviour to Videosift where we have apparently aroused some suspicions.
This group is active commenters and participants in the communities they join. And yes we have been upvoting and commenting on each other's submissions but it's because we truly like what each other has posted. Is this wrong?
I can't speak for the others but I love the Videosift site and I would hate to be banned because I have been over enthusiastic and mistaken for the sockpuppet of a guy I've never heard of before.
So what is the best way to clear up this misunderstanding? I assure you we have not been trying to deliberately harass anyone. We're just trying to make friends.
Silver

My response to silverpoint16 on Youtube.

Silver,
blankfist is an extremely intelligent and vindictive person who was rightly banned from videosift for being abusive of members here.
As far as clearing up any misunderstandings that's a hard one. Any protests you guys make could be seen (will been seen) as just another ploy by blanky. dag is a very careful person and will not take unwarranted action. If you just continue being yourselves--and avoid dystopianfuturetoday and Issykitty--you will probably be okay (as Issy has said someone posted personal information on reddit about them--if I knew who did that I would kick some ass).
I must admit that I still have doubts--but as I said if you are the person from Canada who puts video cameras on her cats I think you are neat.
Do I have your permission to post your message on the Sift Talk?
Boise_Lib

Received from silverpoint16

Yes you have my permission to post my previous message on the Sift Talk.
I understand that from your point of view it will be difficult to prove we are who we say we are. We will continue to be ourselves, those of us that choose to continue using your site. These accusations are very upsetting. I will tell the others to avoid dystopianfuturetoday and Issykitty. I am very sorry to hear that their docs have been dropped on reddit. That is very wrong and I agree that the culprit's ass should be soundly kicked.
I would like to say a word about Jazzy77. It seems a bit harsh to ban her for having the word puppet in her profile. I know she actually meant puppet as in marionette. I sincerely hope that you will reconsider that decision and ask her directly about any concerns you might have.
I am really the person from Canada who puts video cameras on her cats. I guess only time will convince you of that.
Silver

Is this proof that they are not sock puppets? No, but banning should only be used after actionable activity--not suspicious activity. We Do Not want to kick people out just because we think they might be up to something. @marinara please take the ban off of jazzy77 until we know more about this situation.
[Note to silverpoint16--I wasn't clear enough--I don't represent videosift, I'm just an interested person. dft and Issykitty are my friends and really great people who have reason to be leery--please don't think badly of them--or the sift.]

My correspondence with @silverpoint16 via Youtube.
Posted with permission.

I am not a sockpuppet

I think I begin to understand why you where checking up on me yesterday. I am communicating with you via YT to ask your advice on how to proceed because you contacted me yesterday.

The accounts in question are not sock puppet accounts. We are innocent of the charges and we are five real people.

Here's the backstory. It is not coincide that all accounts were opened within a short period of time. The 5 of us became friends on YouTube because we admired the videos each other has created. Most of them are cat channels. When one of us discovered Videosift and liked what we saw, we shared it with the others and all of us decided to set up accounts.

We are an enthusiasic, friendly and supportive group of people on YouTube and we have taken that behaviour to Videosift where we have apparently aroused some suspicions.

This group is active commenters and participants in the communities they join. And yes we have been upvoting and commenting on each other's submissions but it's because we truly like what each other has posted. Is this wrong?

I can't speak for the others but I love the Videosift site and I would hate to be banned because I have been over enthusiastic and mistaken for the sockpuppet of a guy I've never heard of before.

So what is the best way to clear up this misunderstanding? I assure you we have not been trying to deliberately harass anyone. We're just trying to make friends.

Silver

My response to silverpoint16 on Youtube.

Silver,

blankfist is an extremely intelligent and vindictive person who was rightly banned from videosift for being abusive of members here.

As far as clearing up any misunderstandings that's a hard one. Any protests you guys make could be seen (will been seen) as just another ploy by blanky. dag is a very careful person and will not take unwarranted action. If you just continue being yourselves--and avoid dystopianfuturetoday and Issykitty--you will probably be okay (as Issy has said someone posted personal information on reddit about them--if I knew who did that I would kick some ass).

I must admit that I still have doubts--but as I said if you are the person from Canada who puts video cameras on her cats I think you are neat.

Do I have your permission to post your message on the Sift Talk?

Boise_Lib

Received from silverpoint16

Yes you have my permission to post my previous message on the Sift Talk.

I understand that from your point of view it will be difficult to prove we are who we say we are. We will continue to be ourselves, those of us that choose to continue using your site. These accusations are very upsetting. I will tell the others to avoid dystopianfuturetoday and Issykitty. I am very sorry to hear that their docs have been dropped on reddit. That is very wrong and I agree that the culprit's ass should be soundly kicked.

I would like to say a word about Jazzy77. It seems a bit harsh to ban her for having the word puppet in her profile. I know she actually meant puppet as in marionette. I sincerely hope that you will reconsider that decision and ask her directly about any concerns you might have.

I am really the person from Canada who puts video cameras on her cats. I guess only time will convince you of that.

Silver

Is this proof that they are not sock puppets? No, but banning should only be used after actionable activity--not suspicious activity. We Do Not want to kick people out just because we think they might be up to something. @marinara please take the ban off of jazzy77 until we know more about this situation.

[Note to silverpoint16--I wasn't clear enough--I don't represent videosift, I'm just an interested person. dft and Issykitty are my friends and really great people who have reason to be leery--please don't think badly of them--or the sift.]