Thanks for that, but of course you realize you're going to hell as well. Well, I suppose you already knew that.

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
*quality

mumble, mumble, mumble...

The Aristocrats!

[edit: I can't believe someone voted for this]

^ No denying leftists can be violent. We're just denying that this violent dictator was leftist.

We also deny that there's any kind of predisposition in America's left to be violent. We're the ones who put flowers in gun barrels, wear tie-dye t-shirts with peace symbols, talk about peace love and understanding.

As far as your vehemence that Hitler was leftist is more based on your view of what "left" means. You use what I think of as the Ron Paul left-right axis. Left means government has power, right means it doesn't.

For me at my most partisan it's closer to the original left-right terms from the French parliament; the right wing are representatives of the aristocrats, royals, and clerics, and the left represents the commoners.

Neither of those scales is playing fair.

Probably the most accurate way to describe the Nazi economic policy is to call it corporatism. Business and government were in cahoots. Libertarians say that means it's definitely leftist, I say that's absolutely right-wing, since real US lefties want an antagonistic relationship between government and business (i.e. cops aren't supposed to take up the causes of criminals), while the American right (read Republicans, not Libertarians) think government should serve the interests of business first and foremost.

All this conversation about Hitler being left or right is totally beside the point.

People who say universal healthcare = Nazis are morons, and deserve to be told so loudly and often.

>> ^EndAll:
ehh.. shoulda waited 'till the end to decide whether to upvote. I like the style of animation, at least.. but this did not provoke any laughter from me. jokes are funny! this isn't.

hahaha silly pipe-smoking puppy...why would you vote for a joke before the punchline??????????

By my standards this really is the most offensive aristocrat joke out there... No joke.

>> ^westy:
can we ban rottenseed I find his post offensive, this is not funny.

Nobody is stopping you from trying.

>> ^westy:
can we ban rottenseed I find his post offensive, this is not funny.


Is that sarcasm? If not, I think it is absolutely hilarious that you would find this version of the Aristocrats joke offensive. This is BY FAR the least offensive version I have heard. The entire point of the joke is to offend the listener as much has humanly possible.

http://www.videosift.com/search?q=aristocrats

I like how this video is basically the equivalent of the Aristocrats for quantum physics...

>> ^Doc_M:
Be mature about religious debate people. You think it is bunk? Describe why you think so. Start a discussion. Don't just tag this the way you feel. That's just aristocratic douchbaggery. Don't be a douche.

Um, first off...the chicken or the egg debate starts with you. You changed the tags first...and you changed the channel assignments. If you want to open up a discussion about what they should be, then go right ahead. Or, you can just change them. But, what you can't do is change them and then justify calling those out who didn't put them in as you'd like to have seen them...

If somebody wants to put their own beliefs in their tags, then fine. Go ahead and find some atheist videos to submit and add the tag "bullshit" in there. It only goes to say how you feel about something. Mostly, we respect what each other puts in our own tags, unless it is absolute misinformation (ie. putting the wrong actor, or show name) or adding something to it that wasn't there before.

Nothing is keeping you from a debate. We all love to debate, but don't go effin' with the tags just because you don't agree.

Be mature about religious debate people. You think it is bunk? Describe why you think so. Start a discussion. Don't just tag this the way you feel. That's just aristocratic douchbaggery. Don't be a douche.

>> ^Crake:
I had a similar experience in Malaysia where I and everyone else got kicked out of a gym because one of the Sultan's sons needed a massage. I'd think America would have more of a resilience against aristocratic tendencies sprouting, and quickly prune them.


Seriously tough - America loves its aristocratic families... if not in politics, then there's the celebrities, and sporting dynasties...

I had a similar experience in Malaysia where I and everyone else got kicked out of a gym because one of the Sultan's sons needed a massage. I'd think America would have more of a resilience against aristocratic tendencies sprouting, and quickly prune them.

"He made one of the most disgusting comments anybody could ever make."

I don't think Rick Sanchez has ever heard an Aristocrats joke.

Aristocrats!

The Aristocrats!