I liked this except I would have liked it more if they would have left out the turntable scratch/dub effects. For fun I decided made a list of all the songs I could identify. Not sure if this means I'm just a Bond fan or have crossed over to Bond nerd.

0:05 On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
0:14 James Bond Theme
0:32 Goldfinger
0:55 Moonraker
1:12 You Only Live Twice
1:40 Mr. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (Thunderball)
1:50 On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (Propellerheads Version)
2:16 James Bond Theme
2:31 On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
2:39 Man With the Golden Gun
2:45 View to a Kill
2:51 Die Another Day
3:05 Diamonds Are Forever
3:24 From Russia with Love
3:34 License to Kill
3:55 Goldeneye
4:07 Live and Let Die
4:41 James Bond Theme
4:53 Nobody Does It Better

>> ^lurgee:

>> ^deathcow:
WHAT an album !!! 42 yrs old now

I can recall cruising on big wheel while the hearing them being blasted from 8-track players in my old hood.


My older brother had this 6? foot long by 3 foot high cabinet stereo where the top slid open and it had a turntable and the controls. It had like wood lattice speakers and really coarse cloth over them under the lattice. He would play it on there.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Hideaki Ishi, dj krush, trip hop, turntablism' to 'Hideaki Ishi, dj krush, trip hop, turntablism, Deborah Anderson' - edited by Barseps

I understand when converting from digital to analog that quality is lost. But I never said anything about converting digital to analog...just analog vs digital.

I was mainly adressing the comment you made that "they were talking about transferring the recording from PC onto the disc" which is not what they said. It's what you assumed...and you could be right and you could be wrong. You also said "would it be stored somewhere first....say....in a digital format?" that is also an assumption...it could be coming from a digital format, it could be coming from an analog format...we don't know...they didn't say.

Believe it or not but it's not unheard of for an artist to provide master analog tapes when they know they will be putting their music to vinyl. It's also very common for reissues of of older recordings to be done using the orginal master analog tapes.>> ^charliem:

Oh dear...
How do you think the artists voice is transferred to the LP in the first place? Do you believe they do it straight from an analogue circuit through the mic to the LP, or would it be stored somewhere first....say....in a digital format?
If the conversion from analogue to digital is what 'ruins' the quality....then how can the quality be possibly restored by putting the digital signal onto an analogue format? Surely the missing information doesn't just appear out of quantum strangeness.....
Think about it for a minute.....and if your argument doesn't change, then perhaps you need to redress the way in which you consider yourself to think critically.
>> ^Grimm:
I missed that bit...the only thing I heard about a computer was when he said "a computer monitors the cuting and adjusts the spacings between the grooves".
Also don't confuse digital audio as being superior sounding to analog audio. It has taken many years for digital audio to compete the the sound quality of analog audio. Some audiophiles argue that it still isn't as good. But just because it's "digital" doesn't automatically make it sound better then analog. The real advantage that digital has over analog is that it does not degrade over time or from copy to copy.
Personally I think if you have a really good system I don't think you can tell the difference between a really good analog recording and a digital one except that over time the analog recording will degrade. I think the reason vinyl is making a comeback is that people who grew up with it miss the ritual, the touch, the smell, of taking a record out and putting it on the turntable and placing the needle on the record.
>> ^charliem:
>> ^schlub:
People "refuse to buy into the digital revolution" by purchasing an analogue medium produced from a digital source. Yeah, good work.

No kidding!!
I got to the bit where they were talking about transferring the recording from PC onto the disc and was thinking....hang on.......your reducing the information by quite a huge amount of the original recording, by going from digital to analogue....what?
WHAT? I dont get it.

Oh dear...

How do you think the artists voice is transferred to the LP in the first place? Do you believe they do it straight from an analogue circuit through the mic to the LP, or would it be stored somewhere first....say....in a digital format?

If the conversion from analogue to digital is what 'ruins' the quality....then how can the quality be possibly restored by putting the digital signal onto an analogue format? Surely the missing information doesn't just appear out of quantum strangeness.....

Think about it for a minute.....and if your argument doesn't change, then perhaps you need to redress the way in which you consider yourself to think critically.

>> ^Grimm:

I missed that bit...the only thing I heard about a computer was when he said "a computer monitors the cuting and adjusts the spacings between the grooves".
Also don't confuse digital audio as being superior sounding to analog audio. It has taken many years for digital audio to compete the the sound quality of analog audio. Some audiophiles argue that it still isn't as good. But just because it's "digital" doesn't automatically make it sound better then analog. The real advantage that digital has over analog is that it does not degrade over time or from copy to copy.
Personally I think if you have a really good system I don't think you can tell the difference between a really good analog recording and a digital one except that over time the analog recording will degrade. I think the reason vinyl is making a comeback is that people who grew up with it miss the ritual, the touch, the smell, of taking a record out and putting it on the turntable and placing the needle on the record.
>> ^charliem:
>> ^schlub:
People "refuse to buy into the digital revolution" by purchasing an analogue medium produced from a digital source. Yeah, good work.

No kidding!!
I got to the bit where they were talking about transferring the recording from PC onto the disc and was thinking....hang on.......your reducing the information by quite a huge amount of the original recording, by going from digital to analogue....what?
WHAT? I dont get it.

I missed that bit...the only thing I heard about a computer was when he said "a computer monitors the cuting and adjusts the spacings between the grooves".

Also don't confuse digital audio as being superior sounding to analog audio. It has taken many years for digital audio to compete the the sound quality of analog audio. Some audiophiles argue that it still isn't as good. But just because it's "digital" doesn't automatically make it sound better then analog. The real advantage that digital has over analog is that it does not degrade over time or from copy to copy.

Personally I think if you have a really good system I don't think you can tell the difference between a really good analog recording and a digital one except that over time the analog recording will degrade. I think the reason vinyl is making a comeback is that people who grew up with it miss the ritual, the touch, the smell, of taking a record out and putting it on the turntable and placing the needle on the record.
>> ^charliem:

>> ^schlub:
People "refuse to buy into the digital revolution" by purchasing an analogue medium produced from a digital source. Yeah, good work.

No kidding!!
I got to the bit where they were talking about transferring the recording from PC onto the disc and was thinking....hang on.......your reducing the information by quite a huge amount of the original recording, by going from digital to analogue....what?
WHAT? I dont get it.

Because there are so many videos of Prince Charles playing the turntables. I'm really confounded as to how you came to the conclusion the tags have nothing to do with the video. Sometimes I wonder if you just speak and let the thinking come after.

>> ^BoneRemake:

Although those tags have nothing to do with the video and help absolutely no one in finding dupes

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by BoneRemake.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Playing-tree-rings-on-a-turntable

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by jonny. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

in any case, this is a *dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Playing-tree-rings-on-a-turntable

I see that this is an old post, but here is where I get a lot of my music (besides the aforementioned sites):

turntable.fm (USA or proxy only, sorry!)
hypem.com
various music blogs (playthissongloud.com, thissongissick.com <- these are better for more mainstream electronic artists) many subreddits:
http://www.reddit.com/r/futurebeats/
http://www.reddit.com/r/ambientmusic/
http://www.reddit.com/r/glitch
http://www.reddit.com/r/idm/

>> ^westy:

I don't think the scratching added anything to the track.


I'm with Westy.

Love scratch, love dubstep. Not so certain they do much for me combined like this.

Upvoted. Very catchy indeed & I just LOVE the way he lets the turntable wind down at the very end to give it a nice finish.

3 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.