@Yogi - interesting (and disturbing) observation. In the 5 years I've been living in Thailand, most of the people I've talked US politics with (be they Westerners like Brits, Aussies, etc. or Asians / SE Asians) have exactly the kind of read on US foreign policy that Ron Paul is suggesting we have earned here. Ie., they see beyond the faces of the different presidents calling the shots and notice the long-term track record of going out and meddling, whether that meddling is beneficial or not.

For a long time, I bought into what we hear in the US and was hopeful that, say, the Iraqi people would be appreciative and thankful that we came and "took care of the Saddam Hussein problem". Remember when the troops got to Baghdad and we saw the Iraqis jubilantly tearing down his statue, later discovered to be largely or entirely prompted by US psyops? Then I moderated my position and thought, OK, we got into this, now we've got to see it through to the end for the sake of those people whose lives we have disrupted. That pans out real well when they overwhelmingly just want us to get the hell out...

Anyway, it sort of boggles my mind that Ron Paul would get booed over suggesting a "Golden Rule" approach. Maybe more of our fellow Americans need to get a little more world-wise and see for themselves that we've already got a big backlog of ill-will to overcome from our legacy of unrequested "intervention"...

>> ^cosmovitelli:
The bottom line is rogue elements inside the US Government are commanding private companies to interfere with the expression of constitutionally protected rights in order to destroy an organization that is proving politically awkward for them. What you think of Assange or WL is not the issue: unilateral extrajudicial besieging of lawful political groups is, well, roughly Germany at the start of the 30's.


I completely agree with your assessment here, but the condemning is being directed at VISA,MC,etc and not these neolibs and neocons inside the government. While I no doubt hold VISA,MC,etc in contempt, giving the government a pass is ridiculous.

And if you do your homework, wikileaks and Assange stink of a CIA psyop. Further reason to question the motives of these recent announcements and actions.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I still think it might be financed by Domino's. It's deep, deep, viral PSYOPS shit, that rebrands the company as food for rebels. Of course Corporate would never own up to it - but hey, it gets people on places like VideoSift, (where the cool kids hang out) to talk about Domino's. Mission accomplished.

You know, I could really go for a shitty pizza about now.

>> ^marbles:

Classic Psyops. They put the information there to bait Manning into releasing it. Lamo is an FBI informant. Wikileaks is a CIA/Mossad mouthpiece. Assange is MK Ultra.


And you must have lost your Username... *ba dum tsh*

Classic Psyops. They put the information there to bait Manning into releasing it. Lamo is an FBI informant. Wikileaks is a CIA/Mossad mouthpiece. Assange is MK Ultra.

downvote for the psyops.

Who is this pathetic whiny gym attendant bitching about people wearing jeans??? And that justifies a cop decking a peaceful bike rider for no reason other than they think critical mass is a nuisance.

I almost think this is some bizarre psyops experiment for the upcoming pandemic and financial crash.. and this is an effort to convince even 10 people just to lie down and take it. Pretend it is prison, don't question the stupid attendant, their arbitrary rules and power trip clearly make a vital difference in the world. Who cares if it is made up and capricious. Obey the power-tripping alpha dog at all costs. Take it up the ass in prison, never put up a fight.

Screw that, since when should we be using YT videos from the IDF psyops division???!!!??!

WHat kind of military has a YT page, let alone rabid followers trying to disseminate it far and wide. Go back to their twitter feed.

This is disgusting.

If you think the military "protects free-speech" then you are extremely naive. I'm no damn hippie although I do live in the Bay Area and many of us in California have seen riot police and the military suppress free-speech through violence and police state on many occasions. America never wages war to protect free speech - they use the police and military to censor it in the homeland... I mean come on this is just common knowledge at this point in time. Did you guys not see the recent expose on the military psyops campaign that took place and was supported by all of the mainstream news media outlets? They aren't here to protect your free speech you so adamantly speak of.

Code Pink sucks and are usually really annoying (they did pie a KRON 4 newscaster once and thought that was hilarious) but so does the military industrial complex and I think that is essentially what they are protesting. The only reason I would support the military is that for many of the less fortunate it is their only way to better skills and education. Obviously, this needs to STOP. This country doesn't need to be spending most of the tax money on military to wage war so defense contractors can run away with fortunes ; we need that money going into education fucking NOW.

Fingers are good for typing to.

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

In reply to this comment by Fade:
Okay moron there's no need to be a dick head. I'm not arguing for or against this. I just thought it was curious. If you want to be an asshole and call me names then go fuck your self you faggot!

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
No, but we do live in a real world where morons who put four time-lapsed pictures together can fool other idiots such as yourself. Don't be thick.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
If what you are saying is true then you should be able to see the structure in the fourth picture too. We don't live in a cartoon world where objects leave shadows of themselves in dust.

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
I see four pictures from a piece of a structure collapsing. In the second picture, it has begun to fall down, and there is absolutely not steel missing from it. The third picture obviously has a greater time lapse than the break between the first two, but is still continuing the progression downwards and slightly outwards. Now, I'm no physicist, but it seems pretty obvious to me that just as when you drop something into water, it causes a splash, when a huge object drops at a decent speed through a huge cloud of dust and debris, some of it will get pushed upwards along it.

You should also note that in the third picture, there is still no disintegration of the steel. That tall projecting piece is the same size and thickness it was in the first picture. What the hell are YOU talking about? I'm tired of absolutely RETARDED 9/11 theories. Call me when something with actual scientific evidence pops up. Oh wait. It won't. Because people have gone over all sorts of bullshit for it and tried every scientifically possible concept they could think up to try to make some government conspiracy theory, and they were easily shot down by real scientists. I guess it's about time they start turning to fairy tales.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
What the hell are you talking about? I see steel turning into dust. What does falling though the dust have to do with it?

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
>> Fade:
I'm particularly fascinated by this one http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

OH GOD WHEN A HUGE HEAVY OBJECT IS FALLING THROUGH A DUSTCLOUD IT FALLS FASTER THAN DUST OH HEAVEN DEAR GOD HALP PSYOPS

BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

In reply to this comment by Fade:
Okay moron there's no need to be a dick head. I'm not arguing for or against this. I just thought it was curious. If you want to be an asshole and call me names then go fuck your self you faggot!

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
No, but we do live in a real world where morons who put four time-lapsed pictures together can fool other idiots such as yourself. Don't be thick.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
If what you are saying is true then you should be able to see the structure in the fourth picture too. We don't live in a cartoon world where objects leave shadows of themselves in dust.

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
I see four pictures from a piece of a structure collapsing. In the second picture, it has begun to fall down, and there is absolutely not steel missing from it. The third picture obviously has a greater time lapse than the break between the first two, but is still continuing the progression downwards and slightly outwards. Now, I'm no physicist, but it seems pretty obvious to me that just as when you drop something into water, it causes a splash, when a huge object drops at a decent speed through a huge cloud of dust and debris, some of it will get pushed upwards along it.

You should also note that in the third picture, there is still no disintegration of the steel. That tall projecting piece is the same size and thickness it was in the first picture. What the hell are YOU talking about? I'm tired of absolutely RETARDED 9/11 theories. Call me when something with actual scientific evidence pops up. Oh wait. It won't. Because people have gone over all sorts of bullshit for it and tried every scientifically possible concept they could think up to try to make some government conspiracy theory, and they were easily shot down by real scientists. I guess it's about time they start turning to fairy tales.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
What the hell are you talking about? I see steel turning into dust. What does falling though the dust have to do with it?

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
>> Fade:
I'm particularly fascinated by this one http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

OH GOD WHEN A HUGE HEAVY OBJECT IS FALLING THROUGH A DUSTCLOUD IT FALLS FASTER THAN DUST OH HEAVEN DEAR GOD HALP PSYOPS

Okay moron there's no need to be a dick head. I'm not arguing for or against this. I just thought it was curious. If you want to be an asshole and call me names then go fuck your self you faggot!

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
No, but we do live in a real world where morons who put four time-lapsed pictures together can fool other idiots such as yourself. Don't be thick.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
If what you are saying is true then you should be able to see the structure in the fourth picture too. We don't live in a cartoon world where objects leave shadows of themselves in dust.

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
I see four pictures from a piece of a structure collapsing. In the second picture, it has begun to fall down, and there is absolutely not steel missing from it. The third picture obviously has a greater time lapse than the break between the first two, but is still continuing the progression downwards and slightly outwards. Now, I'm no physicist, but it seems pretty obvious to me that just as when you drop something into water, it causes a splash, when a huge object drops at a decent speed through a huge cloud of dust and debris, some of it will get pushed upwards along it.

You should also note that in the third picture, there is still no disintegration of the steel. That tall projecting piece is the same size and thickness it was in the first picture. What the hell are YOU talking about? I'm tired of absolutely RETARDED 9/11 theories. Call me when something with actual scientific evidence pops up. Oh wait. It won't. Because people have gone over all sorts of bullshit for it and tried every scientifically possible concept they could think up to try to make some government conspiracy theory, and they were easily shot down by real scientists. I guess it's about time they start turning to fairy tales.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
What the hell are you talking about? I see steel turning into dust. What does falling though the dust have to do with it?

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
>> Fade:
I'm particularly fascinated by this one http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

OH GOD WHEN A HUGE HEAVY OBJECT IS FALLING THROUGH A DUSTCLOUD IT FALLS FASTER THAN DUST OH HEAVEN DEAR GOD HALP PSYOPS

No, but we do live in a real world where morons who put four time-lapsed pictures together can fool other idiots such as yourself. Don't be thick.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
If what you are saying is true then you should be able to see the structure in the fourth picture too. We don't live in a cartoon world where objects leave shadows of themselves in dust.

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
I see four pictures from a piece of a structure collapsing. In the second picture, it has begun to fall down, and there is absolutely not steel missing from it. The third picture obviously has a greater time lapse than the break between the first two, but is still continuing the progression downwards and slightly outwards. Now, I'm no physicist, but it seems pretty obvious to me that just as when you drop something into water, it causes a splash, when a huge object drops at a decent speed through a huge cloud of dust and debris, some of it will get pushed upwards along it.

You should also note that in the third picture, there is still no disintegration of the steel. That tall projecting piece is the same size and thickness it was in the first picture. What the hell are YOU talking about? I'm tired of absolutely RETARDED 9/11 theories. Call me when something with actual scientific evidence pops up. Oh wait. It won't. Because people have gone over all sorts of bullshit for it and tried every scientifically possible concept they could think up to try to make some government conspiracy theory, and they were easily shot down by real scientists. I guess it's about time they start turning to fairy tales.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
What the hell are you talking about? I see steel turning into dust. What does falling though the dust have to do with it?

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
>> Fade:
I'm particularly fascinated by this one http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

OH GOD WHEN A HUGE HEAVY OBJECT IS FALLING THROUGH A DUSTCLOUD IT FALLS FASTER THAN DUST OH HEAVEN DEAR GOD HALP PSYOPS

If what you are saying is true then you should be able to see the structure in the fourth picture too. We don't live in a cartoon world where objects leave shadows of themselves in dust.

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
I see four pictures from a piece of a structure collapsing. In the second picture, it has begun to fall down, and there is absolutely not steel missing from it. The third picture obviously has a greater time lapse than the break between the first two, but is still continuing the progression downwards and slightly outwards. Now, I'm no physicist, but it seems pretty obvious to me that just as when you drop something into water, it causes a splash, when a huge object drops at a decent speed through a huge cloud of dust and debris, some of it will get pushed upwards along it.

You should also note that in the third picture, there is still no disintegration of the steel. That tall projecting piece is the same size and thickness it was in the first picture. What the hell are YOU talking about? I'm tired of absolutely RETARDED 9/11 theories. Call me when something with actual scientific evidence pops up. Oh wait. It won't. Because people have gone over all sorts of bullshit for it and tried every scientifically possible concept they could think up to try to make some government conspiracy theory, and they were easily shot down by real scientists. I guess it's about time they start turning to fairy tales.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
What the hell are you talking about? I see steel turning into dust. What does falling though the dust have to do with it?

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
>> Fade:
I'm particularly fascinated by this one http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

OH GOD WHEN A HUGE HEAVY OBJECT IS FALLING THROUGH A DUSTCLOUD IT FALLS FASTER THAN DUST OH HEAVEN DEAR GOD HALP PSYOPS

I see four pictures from a piece of a structure collapsing. In the second picture, it has begun to fall down, and there is absolutely not steel missing from it. The third picture obviously has a greater time lapse than the break between the first two, but is still continuing the progression downwards and slightly outwards. Now, I'm no physicist, but it seems pretty obvious to me that just as when you drop something into water, it causes a splash, when a huge object drops at a decent speed through a huge cloud of dust and debris, some of it will get pushed upwards along it.

You should also note that in the third picture, there is still no disintegration of the steel. That tall projecting piece is the same size and thickness it was in the first picture. What the hell are YOU talking about? I'm tired of absolutely RETARDED 9/11 theories. Call me when something with actual scientific evidence pops up. Oh wait. It won't. Because people have gone over all sorts of bullshit for it and tried every scientifically possible concept they could think up to try to make some government conspiracy theory, and they were easily shot down by real scientists. I guess it's about time they start turning to fairy tales.

In reply to this comment by Fade:
What the hell are you talking about? I see steel turning into dust. What does falling though the dust have to do with it?

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
>> Fade:
I'm particularly fascinated by this one http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

OH GOD WHEN A HUGE HEAVY OBJECT IS FALLING THROUGH A DUSTCLOUD IT FALLS FASTER THAN DUST OH HEAVEN DEAR GOD HALP PSYOPS