>> ^alien_concept:

Do you call them white labradors? Here that's a golden labrador


I've always known them as yellow Labs.

Do you call them white labradors? Here that's a golden labrador

Idaho currently has open primaries (they're trying to change that now). I voted in the R's primary in 2010. I did this to vote against the insane candidate--so I had to vote for the totally corrupt candidate.

I'm registered as an Independent. You've given me something to think about.

http://videosift.com/video/Cute-Chocolate-Lab-With-Kitten

Labs are great! Nose rub.

>> ^luxury_pie:

>> ^Lawdeedaw:
This is cute, but I don't think I would ever let my children around a pit, nor another dog of mine. A cat though? Sure

Depends on the dog. I agree on every real guarding-dog, which has to rely on its defensive- and pack-instincts. But there are family-dogs which go very well with kids.
A year ago we had a family reunion and my cousines and my brother brought their toddlers and our dog, a labrador-retriever, was the ultimate trampoline for them. She endured around 10 very loud children - unattended - without any problems. They were grabbing her nose, her teeth, played with her ears and all she did, was lie there and sigh a bit. After two hours or so she got tired of that, dropped a growl and escaped the madness.
I would even entrust my hamburgerz to this dog!

>> ^Lawdeedaw:

This is cute, but I don't think I would ever let my children around a pit, nor another dog of mine. A cat though? Sure


Depends on the dog. I agree on every real guarding-dog, which has to rely on its defensive- and pack-instincts. But there are family-dogs which go very well with kids.
A year ago we had a family reunion and my cousines and my brother brought their toddlers and our dog, a labrador-retriever, was the ultimate trampoline for them. She endured around 10 very loud children - unattended - without any problems. They were grabbing her nose, her teeth, played with her ears and all she did, was lie there and sigh a bit. After two hours or so she got tired of that, dropped a growl and escaped the madness.
I would even entrust my hamburgerz to this dog!

There does not exist a better breed of animal than the Labrador.

It's science, don't argue.

Dogs and dolphins are definitely close - but the German shepherd looked like he knew better and was mournful of his lose of the sea. Get a Labrador near water and it wouldn't have taken over a minute for him to jump in.

Your video, A Labrador swims with a dolphin off the coast of Ireland!, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

@gorillaman

Anyone who thinks white privilege isn't real obviously isn't brown.

You're saying that every brown person that isn't treated statistically as equal as the average whitie is purely a result of chance?

Which is obviously bullshit because individuals are responsible for all their actions.

[Even if our Ego & conscience trying to steer our dumb animalistic brains is akin to a flea controlling a bear.]

So while chance may have bestowed great riches onto all white folk and Aids, sickle cell, and markedly lower generational wealth onto all brown folk..

They really doesn't make up the whole ..lynchin'-motherfuckers-and-displaying-them-in-trees-because-they-tried-to-attend-school-where-there-were-white-girls.. gap.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Also, HATE the "human race is all one race. See, racism never existed" argument.

I mean.. you've seen dogs by your age, right?
Labradors - dalmatians - great danes - jack russells.

Those are all within the Canis Lupus species yet they all look completely different.

They have different outward and inward appearance and are prone to different genetic disorders and diseases and so on..

So if dogs can have different breeds. Humans can't have different breeds..?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And finally.. WTF?! The study of history can't be applied to anything meaningful?!?!

Now I'm absolutely convinced you're either trollin' or just stupid as all fuck.

What kind of person thinks that learning the collective knowledge of ALL OF THE HUMANS THAT HAVE EVER BEEN ALIVE BEFORE YOU [about 100 billion] is meaningless?

You don't think knowing what all the other dumb humans did to get themselves and their societies wiped off the planet is useful?

Yeah i'm probably done with this. Unless you make some other awful intellectually compartmentalized rebuttal.

We have a Labrador and you may know how they are with food -_-;;, yet my brother managed to teach him so well that if we forget to give him the command to eat, he will sit at his bowl drooling for hours. I found this out the hard way... when he eventually managed to drag himself away from staring at his food long enough to come get my attention, a good couple of hours later. Needless to say I felt very guilty.

>> ^mxxcon:
and then they showed the other part of that video with human head but dog's butt.


Where? [grin]

This video reminded me of a Whose Line It Is Anyway? skit.

Your video, Labrador: Dog eating at the table., has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

That's a Labrador retriever, which makes him a *Canadian, naturally.

I don't think there is much else to say but "amazing." It thinks it's a labrador.

Average pounds per year of Sugar Consumption
1700: 4 lbs
1800: 18 lbs
1900: 90 lbs
2000: 145 lbs
2009: 156 lbs

Cancer, Heart Disease, Diabetes, Dementia, etc. were all virtually nonexistent several hundred years ago. Life expectancy figures you've likely heard where people only lived to be 35, etc. are complete B.S. High infant mortality rates, accidents, and infectious disease dramatically skew the life expectancy downward. Those subsets of the population not affected by these outside factors lived to be in excess of 80-100 years old without any incidence of cancer, heart disease, diabetes - the so called "diseases of civilization." Here is a table of ages of deaths for a population of Inuit from the Moravian Church in Labrador
and the Russian Church in Alaska, 1822-1836:

Aleuts, Unalaska district
Died ages 1-4 -- 92
Died ages 4-7 -- 17
Died ages 7-15 -- 41
Died ages 15-25 -- 41
Died ages 25-45 -- 103
Died ages 45-55 -- 66
Died ages 55-60 -- 29
Died ages 60-65 -- 22
Died ages 65-70 -- 24
Died ages 70-75 -- 23
Died ages 75-80 -- 11
Died ages 80-90 -- 20
Died ages 90-100 -- 2

People who lived in the jesus damn Artic 200 years ago, had zero access to fruits or vegetables and subsisted on a diet of 100% meat (fish, seals, whales, etc.) for their entire lives. 25% of them lived to be over 60 years old, with some living past 90...in a freaking igloo!

In one study of terminally ill patients, patients who were so close to dying that any treatment (including no treatment) was deemed ethical, an intervention method consisting of the complete removal sugar from their diets (think about what most hospital diets consist of for a second) was introduced. Those patients living past the first week (most were so far gone, they died before the study could even start) had their tumors either regress enough to be surgically treated, or experienced full remission. Patients who were previously given less than a week to live were now cancer-free simply by removing sugar from their diets.

Cancer cells have been shown in many studies ( including this one http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=296896) to have a disproportionally higher number of insulin receptor cells. Cancerous cells are "successful" mutations from an evolutionary perspective in that they lead to massive cell propagation. However, most cancerous cells have no method of internal cell metabolism, and must subsist and grow almost exclusively on energy supplied by blood glucose (hence the elevated receptor count). Essentially, cancerous cells are "parasites." By removing all sources of glucose from the body, and entering a state of ketosis, where acetone bodys supply energy to the cells as opposed to glucose, the cancer cells starve; dying or slowing growth to the point where the body's immune system can sucessfully remove them.

Long story short, you wanna live to be 100, stop drinking so much f*ing soda.