Beat me by 20 minutes. Very Simpson'esque of them.

Sorry...I can't maintain internet anger for more than a day. That's like 4 months in internet time>> ^ChaosEngine:

>> ^rottenseed:
Nobody is asking for anybody's opinion you dumb baby...that's what voting is for.
What I'm saying is he offered NOTHING. Not only that, but he/she is a probie so they have NEVER OFFERED ANYTHING to this site...get it now, dummy? Get why this fucking site is going to shit and you're all a bunch of horribly stupid people?
No problem, dumbass. You're absolutely right, the internet is full of annoying people who think they're entitled to "comment" on something. Especially those newb bastards who don't spend every waking minute on this site.... sheesh.

>> ^rottenseed:

Nobody is asking for anybody's opinion you dumb baby...that's what voting is for.
What I'm saying is he offered NOTHING. Not only that, but he/she is a probie so they have NEVER OFFERED ANYTHING to this site...get it now, dummy? Get why this fucking site is going to shit and you're all a bunch of horribly stupid people?

No problem, dumbass. You're absolutely right, the internet is full of annoying people who think they're entitled to "comment" on something. Especially those newb bastards who don't spend every waking minute on this site.... sheesh.

Nobody is asking for anybody's opinion you dumb baby...that's what voting is for.

What I'm saying is he offered NOTHING. Not only that, but he/she is a probie so they have NEVER OFFERED ANYTHING to this site...get it now, dummy? Get why this fucking site is going to shit and you're all a bunch of horribly stupid people?>> ^ChaosEngine:

>> ^rottenseed:
Whooooooooa somebody on the internet doesn't like something and voiced his or her opinion about it...call Guinness world records, we've got ourselves a "trailblazer".>> ^zaust:
Is this missing the punchline - as it stands it's not funny at all


The nerve of the guy. Coming onto a site specifically dedicated to sifting good videos from bad and actually posting an opinion on content...

>> ^rottenseed:

Whooooooooa somebody on the internet doesn't like something and voiced his or her opinion about it...call Guinness world records, we've got ourselves a "trailblazer".>> ^zaust:
Is this missing the punchline - as it stands it's not funny at all



The nerve of the guy. Coming onto a site specifically dedicated to sifting good videos from bad and actually posting an opinion on content...

Whooooooooa somebody on the internet doesn't like something and voiced his or her opinion about it...call Guinness world records, we've got ourselves a "trailblazer".>> ^zaust:

Is this missing the punchline - as it stands it's not funny at all

>> ^Krupo:

dead


I can't find its replacement.

>> ^Sarzy:

Why does this not seem familiar at all? Did I miss an episode, or is this from an upcoming one?


You too?!?!?!?! I don't remember this one as a hardcore Simpsons fan, but this is funny! I wonder what season and episode it was from. Obviously, a recently one since it is in HD. LOL @ lazy Bart and Homer like me. I want to know what happens after Chief Wiggum landed down!

Wait, this was posted two days ago. Maybe it is a clip from a future episode! Dang spoilers! http://www.youtube.com/user/ANIMATIONonFOX?feature=watch has other clips too that I have not seen before from the shows/series I watch.

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
Thanks PP!
In reply to this comment by PlayhousePals:
*quality


(_8(I) d'oh ... Thank YOU for such an entertaining submission =oD

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

no, you are sir.
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
Thanks man, youre the best :
In reply to this comment by lurgee:
*promote

Thanks man, youre the best
In reply to this comment by lurgee:
*promote

That's all well and good, but people don't hold religion in a historical context -- they subvert science beneath these mythical stories and cling to their interpretations of said stories as 'gospel truth' above anything else, empirical or otherwise.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

The Christians most likely lived in and around greek culture dominated by roman law. The Homeric tails and the iliad most likely dominated the prevailing mindset of their area, though, not as much as the hay day of greece. The punishment for not obeying the Gods was pretty drastic, you wouldn't want to be the one to do it unless you were super brave. The bible talks about entire towns of sinners being wiped out or an entire kingdom falling for the sins of a single king, pretty drastic. We must remember not to think in our own context, but of someone whom is bought in to the idea of communing with the creator(s) of existence. It is easy to scarecrow religion to death, but in a way, it was early science...trying to put the world in context the best way we knew how.
>> ^Trancecoach:
... therefore, let's kill each other over what's true or not true on the basis of these stories, shall we.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
>> ^TheJehosephat:
Did she say 4th century... and then say 150-200 years after Christ?
Which is it?

Things were seldom written down, the actual bible stories of mark, matthew, ect, were not written by them nor where they written in those times. So, what I think she meant is the story most likely started at around that time and was then transcribed much later. Studying biblical history from a historic perspective instead of a religious one is pretty fascinating and very hard. Jesus was a popular figure and had many different story lineages until codification much much later in christian history. Just because it it written down doesn't mean it is true or accurate, getting an entirely accurate view of what is happening is hard. Most notably because pretty much all the stories we have of Jesus were finally transcribed much after his death, and anyone who has played the telephone game knows how that goes.

The Christians most likely lived in and around greek culture dominated by roman law. The Homeric tails and the iliad most likely dominated the prevailing mindset of their area, though, not as much as the hay day of greece. The punishment for not obeying the Gods was pretty drastic, you wouldn't want to be the one to do it unless you were super brave. The bible talks about entire towns of sinners being wiped out or an entire kingdom falling for the sins of a single king, pretty drastic. We must remember not to think in our own context, but of someone whom is bought in to the idea of communing with the creator(s) of existence. It is easy to scarecrow religion to death, but in a way, it was early science...trying to put the world in context the best way we knew how.

>> ^Trancecoach:

... therefore, let's kill each other over what's true or not true on the basis of these stories, shall we.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
>> ^TheJehosephat:
Did she say 4th century... and then say 150-200 years after Christ?
Which is it?

Things were seldom written down, the actual bible stories of mark, matthew, ect, were not written by them nor where they written in those times. So, what I think she meant is the story most likely started at around that time and was then transcribed much later. Studying biblical history from a historic perspective instead of a religious one is pretty fascinating and very hard. Jesus was a popular figure and had many different story lineages until codification much much later in christian history. Just because it it written down doesn't mean it is true or accurate, getting an entirely accurate view of what is happening is hard. Most notably because pretty much all the stories we have of Jesus were finally transcribed much after his death, and anyone who has played the telephone game knows how that goes.

I've never wanted to have sex with Homer Simpson more so than I do now. Let the objectification begin!