Videos (1000) | Sift Talk (1000) | Blogs (746) | Comments (1000) |
Videos (1000) | Sift Talk (1000) | Blogs (746) | Comments (1000) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
bobknight33 (Member Profile)
Since you haven’t figured it out yet, when you spam my profile page with your idiotic propaganda videos of brain numbingly stupid idiots lying from mommy’s basement instead of being capable of thinking for yourself I just erase them.
I don’t bother watching them.
Years of curiosity has proven there’s absolutely zero redeeming qualities or factual information in them….I don’t even believe you watch them either, I think you just troll by spam these days, because you are intellectually lazy and weak and don’t know the facts on any topic, including your claimed profession. It’s why you can never answer a question yourself and have to go silent so often if you aren’t provided with one by these morons.
You absolutely can’t think for yourself enough to have a basic discussion, and I’m not having one with Q or all of MAGA’s propaganda machine…even combined your collective IQ is still well below 100.
If you want to MAGA tag a profile page, better keep it on your own. On mine it will just be erased with out being viewed.
PS- AJ Delgado is suing the Trump campaign alleging that she was both taken advantage of and raped by Trump staffer or advisor, Jason Miller. She released text messages proving she’s not alone and that the Trump campaign had already settled multiple harassment and discrimination lawsuits on behalf of campaign staffers…because rape and debauchery and criminality and secret payoffs are what MAGA is about.
Lorne girls at the 2020 Torquay Surfboat Carnival
LETS GO!!
Trump Is Immune - LegalEagle analysis
WRONG.
The invalid and corrupt SCOTUS changed the law to make “official acts” by one person, the president, above the law, can’t even be scrutinized…which has NEVER been the case, indeed our government was designed to avoid exactly that. NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW has been the American motto since its inception. That creed has now been invalidated by this unfathomable decision which adds the asterisk “*except the president when acting officially” while intentionally leaving open the question of what is an official act and what isn’t, allowing for uneven, unequal, inconsistent application based on politics or payoffs, not law or facts.
They did say acts by the POTUS in or outside their authority can be prostituted…legalizing bribery so long as the policy change comes before the final check. A Freudian slip you got correct. That was another change this extremist court just made.
Once again since you cannot read or comprehend what you’ve been told repeatedly, the position was not fear mongering about hypotheticals, it was pointing out the specific anti democratic crimes already committed and those promised by one candidate in their campaign of retribution against the non cultists…the exact examples brought up during arguement that were just determined to be legal, like the assassination of a political rival by the military. That is not hypothetical now, they ruled on it precisely.
LIAR.
No President has ever needed immunity for official acts before Trump because none ever tried to commit felonies then hide behind their authority as president (Nixon tried, but like Trump his crimes were definitely unofficial acts not official no matter how he tried to make them official, not presidential orders but campaign activities just like the coup, but he had the moral fortitude to step down and go away, Trump would rather burn it all down.)
Explain why Trump needs immunity if he didn’t commit crimes.
SCOTUS upheld what always been. Acts done with in POTUS authority are immune from prosecution. Acts done outside of POTUS authority can be criminal and prostituted. Nothing changed nothing added nothing removed.
From the SCOTUS ruling " the dissents position in the end boil down ignoring the Constitution's separation of powers and the Courts precedent and instead fear mongering of extreme hypotheticals.
Trump Is Immune - LegalEagle analysis
So then have JOE Kill Orange man.
HE can't because this guy is bull shit and Joe would go to jail.
Great Moments in Star Trek History - Hello, Computer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_oxynitride
First patent in 1980, 6 years before the 1986 movie where they traveled back to 1986 to invent it! Apparently time line distortions go both ways on the time line!
Stormy Daniels Identifies Trump
HILARIOUS YOU WOULD BRING MORE ATTENTION TO THIS HUMILIATING VIDEO DESCRIPTION OF THE RAPIST’S DEFORMED PENIS!
😂 THANKS 😂
He was indicted by a STATE grand jury, PROSECUTED in STATE courts, and CONVICTED on STATE charges.
😂 Nice try, at a completely unrelated red herring. Chutkan isn’t going to find that he’s now magically immune from state crimes he committed during his campaign before being elected, and signing the final illicit payoff check while in office doesn’t make it all retroactively official government business or duties. Chutkan is considering the motion to avoid any possible appeal, not because there’s merit….but you go ahead and pin your hat on that and I’ll hide and watch. 😂
Again, I understand your desire to defend a man whose morals and actions mirror yours, but I think you do yourself a disservice and instead of constantly supporting the absolute lowest common denominator and the basest of your uncivil instincts you should improve yourself and your standards….but you’re gonna do you.
You might notice your defense has gone from “he didn’t do it” to “you can’t prove he did it” to “it’s not even a crime” to “everybody does it” to “ok, he did it, it is a crime, nobody before has done it and it’s disqualifying for a public official, but when he does it it’s retroactively technically not a crime and is therefore 100% fine…
….FUGHETTABOUTIT”.
Derp
bobknight33 (Member Profile)
@newtboy said: Lied to? How so….be specific.
As expected, you cannot answer because you just spew nonsense like a brain damaged infant….as usual.
Bonus- American Muck Rakers about two years ago launched a website with information suggesting that Lauren Bobert had been an escort on a sugar daddy website, that she had had multiple abortions, and that she engaged in illegal drug usage at the time.
Boebert insisted she was going to sue them and their donors…but didn’t. They sued her for defamation…and she just settled with them and paid Muckrakers who had the story about her being a drug addled hooker who has had multiple abortions (and who has performed public sex acts in front of children REPEATEDLY…once on camera) correct in the first place. They claimed to have lost 90% of their donations due to the threat, so it’s likely a big settlement…and isn’t she already bankrupt, having closed her failed business, sold the house in the divorce, and can’t even afford a criminal attorney for her unemployed criminal son who is also a teenage father and neighborhood menace? Isn’t agreeing to pay them a settlement and never filing a suit herself an admission that their reporting was accurate, and she is a drug using hooker who has had multiple abortions…everything she rails against?
@newtboy
Again you have been lied to by the fake news and Democrat party.
Worst parts about the Apollo moon missions
I think they were likely more disappointed when we stopped going to the moon than by the 15% - 25% of people who are morons who believe every stupid conspiracy theory they hear.
Supreme Court ruling on Donald Trump immunity
@newtboy
Again you have been lied to by the fake news and Democrat party.
Sadly this had to go to the Supreme court just to reiterate the oblivious. When will you learn -- you are always being lied to about Trump.
SCOTUS upheld what always been. Acts done with in POTUS authority are immune from prosecution. Acts done outside of POTUS authority can be criminal and prostituted. Nothing changed nothing added nothing removed.
From the SCOTUS ruling " the dissents position in the end boil down ignoring the Constitution's separation of powers and the Courts precedent and instead fear mongering of extreme hypotheticals."
Biden Brings Felon On Stage
newtboy you know youre winning when the best this moron can do it go "nah ahh your guy does that."
lol bob you are such a LAH-WHO-SER. this election is gonna be fun watching you cry again.
Joe showered with his daughter. Pedophile Joe is your man.
Biden Brings Felon On Stage
To lose, your points must not be valid.
To win, your points must be valid.
Biden won.
Biden also showed his age and missed multiple opportunities to stick it to the felon.
Trump couldn’t get a single fact correct, that’s not good, it’s not even OK. In a debate, that’s a total fail.
Yes, I understand this was more campaign commercial than actual debate. In that, Biden lost.
If Michelle would accept the nomination it would be amazing, Trump would be done and America would be saved by a brilliant woman…but she won’t. I would still be excited for Buttigieg, my choice in 20, but I don’t think he’s going to try either. Anyone is better than the fascist felon. ANYONE. Biden is still a better choice if he’s in a coma.
I watched,
This was Biden's to lose, and he did.
Trump did ok, not great.
Biden looked like a deer in the headlights.
Time to put Michelle Obama in the warm up pen.
Biden Brings Felon On Stage
@bobknight33
Biden crushingly lost the debate....
But that doesn't make Trump's lies true. It doesn't make Trump the better candidate.
Trumps "Russia, Russia, Russia" lie like the entire investigation into him was a hoax is only one of many things that should disqualify him for office. Not just that he's lying about the investigation, but because of the revelations of the investigation itself. The reality of the investigation is SO bad for him that he has to just declare an alternate reality where it's all a lie.
The truth though is that 34 people were indicted as a result of the investigation into the Trump campaign embracing Russian support. 8 of those have plead guilty or been convicted.
The reality got much worse though, as many of those from Trump's campaign were convicted of obstruction of justice, perjury and witness tampering. In return for their committing crimes to cover other crimes, Trump went ahead and granted them pardons... It's beyond imagination.
That's not the bottom though, there is no bottom. Michael Flynn was one of Trump's loyalists that plead guilty to perjury to protect Trump and thus earned a pardon from Trump. After being pardoned Flynn came back to show his continued loyalty to Trump, and after Trump lost the election, promoted a plan for Trump to declare a national emergency, implement martial law, declare the results of the election irrecoverable and initiate a new election vote this time conducted by the military.
So on seeing that plan promoted, Trump invited Flynn to the Whitehouse to advising sessions on handling the election loss...
There is NO bottom to where Trump will go. He's already a convicted felon, and has yet to be convicted or tried for the most egregious of the things he's done.
AND it is also try that he annihilated Biden in this debate.
Doesn't make him a better president.
Stormy Daniels Identifies Trump
He lost.
He lost because he did the crimes.
He did the crimes to cover up moral failings and save his campaign.
All this was proven. Proven to 12 random men and women, not one judge.
Whine all you like, it doesn’t change a single proven fact about the disgraced convicted felon, rapist, and charity fraud.
I understand why you so idolize a man whose morals and actions mirror yours exactly. I also know the world seems scary to you and understand your desire to switch off your brain and go along with newsspeak and doublethink. I don’t think it serves you well, but I understand.
The NY trial was unfair! WAAAHHH!
bobknight33 (Member Profile)
Uh oh….leaked transcripts of the felon’s lawyer’s notes show he knew for certain having the stolen classified documents was a crime and repeatedly tried to get his layer to go along with lying to the DOJ and saying repeatedly “wouldn’t it be better if there are no documents” “shouldn’t we just say there are no documents” “wouldn’t turning over the documents open me up to prosecution or more searches”.
Blows up his “I didn’t know stealing classified state secrets and keeping them in rooms open to the public and lying to theDOJ and FBI about it was wrong” defense…not that that would be a defense in any unbiased court…but he’s got Cannon so it’s a tossup.
Hugh Grant isn't just a mushy RomCom stereotype anymore...
i'm not even going to watch this. A24 = autowatch.