search results matching tag: Free climbing
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (13) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (81) |
Videos (13) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (81) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
The Most Terrifying Job in The World
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Fletch.
The Most Terrifying Job in The World
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Free-Climbing-the-Top-of-a-1786-Foot-Tower
The Most Terrifying Job in The World
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Skeeve. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
Sasha DiGiulian, first woman to climb "Pure Imagination"
In the USA for roped climbing most climbers rate the difficulty with the Yosemite Decimal System (YDS).
First to explain the five in a "5.14d" understand the below:
Class 1: Walking with a low chance of injury.
Class 2: Simple scrambling, with the possibility of occasional use of the hands. Little potential danger is encountered.
Class 3: Scrambling with increased exposure. A rope can be carried but is usually not required. Falls are not always fatal.
Class 4: Simple climbing, with exposure. A rope is often used. Natural protection can be easily found. Falls may well be fatal.
Class 5: Technical free climbing involving rope, belaying, and other protection hardware for safety. Un-roped falls can result in severe injury or death.
So that explains the "5" in a 5.14d
Now 5.1-5.9 with each .1 you have another level of difficulty. From 5.10-5.15 you have 5.10a,5.10b,5.10c,5.10d and so on. Each letter change represents a full level or degree of difficulty.
Thus the difference between a 5.14a and a 5.14d is the same difference between a 5.6 and a 5.10a - or four levels of difficulty. While this may seem subjective climbers usually come to a consensus regarding the grade of a route over time.
Most people I would consider in reasonable shape can climb 5.6-5.8 in the first few times they climb. In contrast I have been climbing for about sixteen years and I climb about 5.13a (with many many attempts!).
Pure imagination may cater to Sasha's particular climbing style - thin crimpy moves. She is amazingly strong.
That said I have been to the base of this route and am amazed ANYONE is able to climb it.
Most dangerous mountain climbing, ever.
Tags for this video have been changed from 'Free Climbing, Steph Davis, Free Solo, Base Jumping, Castleton Tower' to 'Free, Climbing, Solo, Steph Davis, BASE, Castleton Tower, Pervertical Sanctuary' - edited by SlipperyPete
Most dangerous mountain climbing, ever.
Tags for this video have been changed from 'Free Climbing' to 'Free Climbing, Steph Davis, Free Solo, Base Jumping, Castleton Tower' - edited by littledragon_79
Climbing a 1768 Feet (538m) transmission tower
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Duckman33.
Climbing a 1768 Feet (538m) transmission tower
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Free-Climbing-the-Top-of-a-1786-Foot-Tower
Climbing a 1768 Feet (538m) transmission tower
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Hybrid. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
Top of the World
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by RFlagg.
Top of the World
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Free-Climbing-the-Top-of-a-1786-Foot-Tower
Top of the World
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Skeeve. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
Guy climbs 1,400ft Stone Cliff - No Rope
I say "promote" it to high heaven. You *have* to allow people to make sensible assessments of risk. No one's going to rush into free-climbing after seeing this and no one is going to have the balls to replicate these feats.
This film seems more effective in making us aware of a remarkably talented and unique individual. I'm not seeing anything in there that says this is the next level to aspire to. It's all about admiring the talent to do something that very, very few individuals would even attempt. Checking out the comments on YouTube I don't even see a single person stating they would copy this or aspire to do so. There's a general appreciation and awe of an exceptional talent.
My "specious" argument is intended to put into perspective the risks that are more likely to affect greater numbers of people. The kind of risks we need to care about. A few free climbers dying every year? Something they chose to do? That doesn't worry me at all. No more than the guys who die on Everest. I respect their choice and desire to experience something new and to take a risk.
Guy climbs 1,400ft Stone Cliff - No Rope
http://videosift.com/video/Free-climbing-400-feet-in-just-over-4-minutes
A Climb Up The Tallest Tower
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Free-Climbing-the-Top-of-a-1786-Foot-Tower