search results matching tag: Fake voice
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (2) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (7) |
- 1
Videos (2) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (7) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Someone left the news directors mic on!!!
I was kind of thinking the same thing however I havent seen any evidence that leads me to whether it is or not either way its a pretty convincing fake if it indeed is.
>> ^joedirt:
This seems like a fake voice over to me.
Someone left the news directors mic on!!!
This seems like a fake voice over to me.
Jar Jar's New voice for Star wars blu Ray- Better or worse?
Nope, that's not better either... man, if someone is going to do a fake voice for him, why not try to show how they could have made him quite tolerable with a far less silly voice than in the movie. This is just another type of silly voice.
Do him with a voice that's not ridiculous and I think most of the hate for Jar Jar would fade.
Keanu Reeves talks about the "sad keanu" photo
[redacted]
Keanu Reeves talks about the "sad keanu" photo
ARRGGHH! Another person who cant finish a sentence. He at first sounded like he was working on his voice, trying to loose the valley speech. He slipped into an english accent ( Maddonna!) at times.
He was almost making some sense when he dropped the fake voice/tone, but then, he stopped and stuttered. His programming priorty is, voice first , then content and grammar.
He reminds me of Tom Cruise, another famous incoherent blowhard. Is Keanu a scientologist? He seems caught up on words.
Christopher Walken Reads Good Night Moon On The Simpsons
Um, whoever "fixed" the embed... It's the wrong video, fake voices... and horribly done, horribly. I think I'm gonna call *dead again. The poster can decide if I'm wrong and re-fix it if they want I guess... sorry if that's the case. If it is, here is the link for quick ref:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FANPLNki558
NOVA's "Pancake Theory" Simulation Debunked - 9/11
Um...I don't think this is Nova. Notice the difference in the speaking voices? Also, 90% of the what the announcer is saying seems to be written by an amateur and not a writer.
Notice the voice change around 20 seconds in to the actual Nova voice-over...then goes back to the "fake" voice around 30 seconds into the video.
So, I may be a little slow...but is this video re-done by a bunch of 911 conspiracy theorists trying to disprove Nova, or is it being pushed that Nova produced this whole segment with the changing voices?