New "Smart Meters" for Energy Use Put Privacy at Risk
No More Privacy: Smart Meters Are Surveillance Devices That Monitor The Behavior In Your Home Every Single Minute Of Every Single Day
Smart Meters: We can monitor everything you do in your home
More info here: http://stopsmartmeters.org/

It's nothing new, Smart phones have been tracking us for nearly a decade.

don't you dare double ewe tee eff me, mister...

In reply to this comment by berticus:
-_- dude wtf

In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
>> ^berticus:

If it is just us... seems like an awful waste of space.


or it wasn't "made" for anybody, we're just here for the ride

>> ^hpqp:

ItchyKitty has some quality me time

How the eff did you make that smiley?

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by eric3579.

>> ^DerHasisttot:

Eff you Hollywood. This is just idiotic. The only thing this has in common with Peter Pan are the names.
Edit: Why I'm angry: There was no need for a prequel by anyone. All this does is destroy the imagination of little children who read Peter Pan and imagine what came before for themselves. Imho, this prequel destroys a major goal of the original, rousing the imagination of children.


because this ones target audience is obviously children

i for one thinks this looks badass

Eff you Hollywood. This is just idiotic. The only thing this has in common with Peter Pan are the names.

Edit: Why I'm angry: There was no need for a prequel by anyone. All this does is destroy the imagination of little children who read Peter Pan and imagine what came before for themselves. Imho, this prequel destroys a major goal of the original, rousing the imagination of children.

5 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

*isdupe>> ^burdturgler:

dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Keep-Your-Eyes-on-the-Bat

>> ^marinara:

>> ^marbles:
https://www.eff.org/issues/net-neutrality
If you don't want certain companies making decisions about the content of your internet, then your argument should be for a free market rather than accepting a government sanctioned one.

bah. How about this from the EFF:

San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) today to close loopholes in its proposed regulations for network neutrality -- loopholes that could let the entertainment industry and law enforcement hinder free speech and innovation.

>> ^marbles:

https://www.eff.org/issues/net-neutrality
If you don't want certain companies making decisions about the content of your internet, then your argument should be for a free market rather than accepting a government sanctioned one.


bah. How about this from the EFF:

San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) today to close loopholes in its proposed regulations for network neutrality -- loopholes that could let the entertainment industry and law enforcement hinder free speech and innovation.

>> ^marinara:

reason.tv are hypocrites who want to wreck free speech by killing net neutrality.


Net Neutrality will kill internet free speech. https://www.eff.org/issues/net-neutrality

If you don't want certain companies making decisions about the content of your internet, then your argument should be for a free market rather than accepting a government sanctioned one.

eff that, man. My droid rocks!

>> ^Djevel:

I hate my Droid. And consequently...myself.

“Romneycare in Massachuse­tts is a dismal failure. The plan that Axelrod said is most closely related to the Obamacare law. If not for the federal infusions of funds to prop up this colossal failure in Massachuse­tts the state would be broke. Cahill the state treasurer confirmed this in 2010. Now the question is who will bail out America when Obamacare is fully implemente­d?"


It would be a damned good idea not to let taxocrats choose the Republican candidate again next year. Eff McLame. Eff Romney.

Also I found that if you want to use a VS embed of a video you have to go to that videos own page to get a working embed, if you just use say, the front page and single that video out, it will give you a garbaldy gook of an embed that will not work.


eff why I.

Done and done. I think that was like the 10th video I queued, way back when. My titles and tags have improved slightly since then.
In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
Eff yeah, it did. It should have been another Star Wars kid. Maybe the title and tags could use some work...

In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Right on, man! That viddy need some lovin'! Thanks

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
*promote