Your video, Cute Kitten Begging for Food...No Really Wait For It, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I know there's no cute kittens in this documentary, but still...

*promote

And this promote, too! Aw, I feel special!

In reply to this comment by berticus:
*promote

I heard about this today. Cute kitten and bizarre drug story? This could be hitting the top 15 list...

Oh man. Glad the kitten's ok. Crazy freak... though... ugh.

If someone were to make a video containing endless sequences Border Collie puppies playing with cute kittens, then show it at the U.N., we'd have world peace by next Tuesday.

"Ahmadinajad, which would you rather have: a nuclear bomb, or CUTESY-WOOTSY PUPPY-WHUPPIES? C'mon, Somali Warlords, these kitten have snuggles and purrs for you and . . . KIM IL-JONG, YOU SPIT OUT MR. BARKY RIGHT THIS SECOND!!"

Why is that retarded cat wearing a pizza? is it so the cat can't remove the superglue holding it's fake ears back so the proud owner can kawaii over her fake cute kitten?

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by Stingray.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Cute-Kittens-Bop-Their-Head

*discarding the *dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Cute-Kittens-Bop-Their-Head

Other invocations (dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/cute-kittens-bop-their-head) cannot be called when discarding a post - ignoring nonsensical requests by Stingray.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Cute-Kittens-Bop-Their-Head

Invocations (dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/cute-kittens-bop-their-head) cannot be called by Napalm because Napalm is not privileged - sorry.

Ha ha ha - awesome.

Deux Ex vids are almost as successful as cute kitten vids on the Sift for some bizarre reason.

Dupe of http://www.videosift.com/video/Cute-Kittens-Bop-Their-Head *duscard

I personally like how things are but, if there is a problem, it's not the submissions, it's the votes. Changing the queue sizes won't affect that. Especially if they're decreased by the same ratio for everyone. Same goes for changing time that it's queued or votes that it needs to sift. If only one cute kitten video (or whatever it is you think is not SiftWorthy) can be published at a time, then it will, if people vote for it.

>> ^my15minutes:
ok. that was one of the things i was driving at, yes. channel creation.
and maybe it is more of a carrot, than i think, to some sifters, as you say...


If people have the channel carrot hanging in front of them and they're after it, I think that's a positive, and the way it was intended. It means they're interested in being a part of and having an impact on this site. You certainly can't get one overnight, it takes quite a few months at the very least, and anyone who hits 250 deserves one.

>> ^gorillaman:
Or ditch some of the stuff that gets the mediocre videos through in the first place. Beggar's Abyss has no value, and probies really shouldn't be voting.


Beggars canyon does have value. It's not just about getting mediocre videos through. It's another chance to get some attention for your submissions that others might have missed. I've had several videos sifted by using it and once they published they got decent votes. It's also the only thing, besides *.beg that you can spend a power point on until you are gold (unless you buy points or are charter). You may be right on probies voting, though I'm certain a lot of people do come here to just enjoy the videos and vote on the ones they like. I think VS would lose significant traffic if they couldn't.

Not everything on this site has to be the best of the best. Sometimes people just need to chill out and have a quick laugh. If they're enjoying whatever the latest idiotic video is, there's nothing wrong with that.

There's tons of filtering options and ways to view this site. I think the default listing for unsifted videos should be changed to newest queue date so that people who are interested in catching up or doing "quality control" can just scroll through the submissions as they were posted. I also think people need to get over down voting. If you really have a hard on for videos that aren't good enough to be here then vote them down. If the community agrees with you, then problem solved. But, I'm sure if I looked I'd find every one of us has voted for stupid shit.