You has broken links?? Oh noes!!

Anyway, I double checked my code, it seems solid, and I can see the images... hmmm....

@Capt Willard: raven was never gone, she is just hella busy with classes and work where changes have occurred and she now has 2x the responsibility

@gunrock, don't love me, I only found the damn thing, love the maroons who spent god knows how many hours LOLizing the ENTIRE episode! They deserve all yer love/maybe pity

If he does not answer yer call to scholarship, can I give it a go????

Here's a sample.
Chemical Engineering News -1988
"Each year in the United States 80,000 tons of hydrofluosilicic acid, 60,000 tons of sodium silicofluoride and 3,000 tons of sodium fluorides are put into public water supplies". In view of research extant, would it be safe to rephrase the previous sentence and say that each year the United States Government allows 143,000 tons of fluoride products to be added to public water supplies to be able to dispose of a great deal of it and at the same time expose an entire country to the adverse effects of long-term, steady exposure?. Probably at 200 tonnes annually as of 1995, this amount has increased. Now, why on Earth would any oligarchic group (a small group) want to do this to tens of millions of people, deliberately and knowingly?

Fuck man, fluoride is toxic, many many countries have outlawed or disallowed ever, having it put in water supplies...the only reason Americans let the shit continue, is because, most of them think flouride helps yer teeth stay big and stwong, and the rest could give a fiddler's fuck.

Flouride poison is a goddamn no-brainer for a layman..."10 greatest acheivements of the 20th century, MY ASS!! I'll take dentures, and a healthy liver and onions thank you!!!

More to come, if qruel backs away, Capt. Peer-review...

Thanks Capt!
*requeue

>> MarineGunrock:
>> CaptWillard: So what you're saying is that you're the final judge of quality, right? How else am I to interpret that? I basically said that quality is subjective, thereby at least giving us some wiggle room to respect our differences in opinion, Give me a break. Capt. Willy, methinks you need to not get so offended because Lucky's opinion is different than yours. Isn't that what you were preaching about up there? Respecting difference of opinion? He said his, you said yours. There really isn't much else to be said, and especially done. So just give it up and drop it. There is no need for sarcastic remarks and snide comments about "SiftGods" and "Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Quality."

Methinks you have a piss-poor understanding of what I just said, MGR. I originally took the stance about quality being in the eye of the beholder, i.e., it's all a matter of opinion, while Lucky's declaration that gorgonheap's post is (italics his) no more than a rant is a solid declaration that there is no gray area. In other words, he is treating it as a fact. Not me. Pay attention.

Don't try to give me any lessons in manners either, as I've been the recipient of your oh-so courteous treatment, as well as others. Is it time now for you tell me to "stay the fuck out" of Sift Talk? As YOU would say, "Give me a fucking break".

Lucky's ass has been duly kissed now, so run along, brown-nosing hypocrite.

>> CaptWillard:
So what you're saying is that you're the final judge of quality, right? How else am I to interpret that? I basically said that quality is subjective, thereby at least giving us some wiggle room to respect our differences in opinion, Give me a break.

Capt. Willy, methinks you need to not get so offended because Lucky's opinion is different than yours. Isn't that what you were preaching about up there? Respecting difference of opinion?

He said his, you said yours. There really isn't much else to be said, and especially done. So just give it up and drop it. There is no need for sarcastic remarks and snide comments about "SiftGods" and "Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Quality."

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Nice Post Capt. The music goes really well with this.

It does make you wonder if there is some "upper limit" on scandalous images that will be reached. I remember that here in Australia there was a French film causing some uproar for showing a close-up of an ejaculating penis. Is there much beyond that kind of thing?

damn - still waiting for that *merge command.

sorry capt - *discard

grats capt! now help me find some fucking mangos.

Yay! Congrats to the Capt!!!

Thanks for the save, Capt Williard!

Capt Willard, don't pull that tl;dr bullshit. There are over 100 comments on that thread dealing with that entire situation. It has been dealt with and closed for over 7 months. You've been here two months. You don't need to reopen anything, your right. The site administrators have said their final word, and that is that. * discard this post, so we can avoid another HUGE and unnecessary Siftqusition.

That was a very special case in which he originally had permission to do what he did, but it got out of hand.

Go to school dammit

I heartz

In reply to this comment by raven:
Oh Capt. Winters... you've fallen so far, no longer can you be a sexy Steve McQueen substitute... we mourn your loss.

Oh Capt. Winters... you've fallen so far, no longer can you be a sexy Steve McQueen substitute... we mourn your loss.

this crazy negro has a gadjillon youtube clips, he's always doing insane schtuff.....he looks like yer average, sit around the house, getting stoned and actin' crazy (normal) kinna freakazoid......he's Capt. Anal Expulsive, and looks like he has quite the following....been banned from youtube once too...

Calm down now, Capt. Willard. Maybe I should have ended that post with a " " so you didn't get offended? That's actually what I came back here to do, and then I saw your last post. I didn't mean for you to get your panties in a bunch.